Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Delk, 781 N.W.2d 426.

209 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Moreover, “[t]his court will not generally review a district court’s exercise of its discretion to sentence a defendant when the sentence imposed is within the presumptive guidelines range.” 28 (Minn. App. 2010), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Minnesota law is clear that “a ny sentence within the presumptive range for the convicted offense constitutes a presumptive sentence.” review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010) ; d 353, 359 n.2 (Minn. 2008) (noting that each cell i n the sentencing grid contains three numbers and “[a]ll three numbers in any given cell constitute an a cceptable sentence”).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Delk , review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“This court will not generally review a district court’s exercise of its discretion to sentence a defendant when the sentence imposed is within the presumptive guidelines range.” review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
d 426, 428 (Minn. App. 2010), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Id.; review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010) (“This court will not generally review a district court’s exercise of its discretion to sentence a defendant when the sentence imposed is within the presumptive guidelines range.”).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
constitutes a presumptive sentence.” review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
constitutes a presumptive sentence.” review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Nor will this court generally “review a district court’s exercise of its discretion to sentence a defendant when the sentence imposed is within the presumptive guidelines range.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(quotations and citations omitted), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
d 426, 428 (Minn. App. 2010), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Delk , review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
While 161 months is one of the presumptive sentences for kidnapping, “any sentence within the presumptive range for the convicted offense constitutes a presumptive sentence.” review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
d 426, 428 (Minn. App. 2010), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See State v. Delk , (limiting reversal of sentencing court’ s imposition of presumptive sentence to rare cases), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
d 426, 428 (Minn. App. 2010) (“This court will generally not exercise its authority to modify a sentence within the presum ptive range absent compelli ng circumstances.” (quotation omitted)), review denied (Minn. July 10, 2010).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(“[A]ny sentence within the presumptive range for the convicted offense constitutes a presumptive sentence.”).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“This court will not generally review a district court’s exercise of its discretion to sentence a defendant when the sentence imposed is within the presumptive guidelines range.”
A16-0880 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
d 426, 428 (Minn. App. 2010), review denied (Minn. July 20, 201 0).
State of Minnesota v. Theodore Pierre Jerry Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Theodore Pierre Jerry Minn. Ct. App. 2016
303 Minn. 376, 380, review denied (July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota v. Ishamel Portwood Middlebrook Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Dionte Gosa Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Ishamel Portwood Middlebrook Minn. Ct. App. 2016
d 426, 428 (Minn. App. 2010), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota v. Dionte Gosa Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“This court will not generally review a district court’s exercise of its discretion to sentence a defendant when the sentence imposed is within the presumptive guidelines range.”
State of Minnesota v. Allen Maurice Moffett Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. David Muniz Bustos Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. David Muniz Bustos Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“[A]ny sentence within the presumptive range [specified in the sentencing guidelines] for the convicted offense constitutes a presumptive sentence.” review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota v. Allen Maurice Moffett Minn. Ct. App. 2016
But, “[t]his court will not generally review a district court’s exercise of its discretion to sentence a defendant when the sentence imposed is within the presumptive guidelines 3 range.” review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota v. Mark Anthony Sanders Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Mark Anthony Sanders Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“[A]ny sentence within the presumptive range for the convicted offense constitutes a presumptive sentence.” review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Alvin Hennen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Morris Gaye Kayee v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Charles ONeal Darby, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Charles ONeal Darby, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010); see Minn. Sent.
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Alvin Hennen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
sumptive sentence range.” d 10, 14 (Minn. 2015); (stating that appellate courts “will not ordinarily interfere with a sentence falling within the presumptive sentence range, either dispositionally or durationally, even if there are grounds that would justify departure” (quotation omitted)); (“Presumptive sentences are seldom overturned.” (quotation omitted)), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
Morris Gaye Kayee v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
But “[a]ll three numbers in any given cell [on the sentencing guidelines grid] constitute an acceptable sentence.” n.2 (Minn. 2008); review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010) (“[A]ny sentence within the presumptive range for the convicted offense constitutes a presumptive sentence.”).
State of Minnesota v. Charles Kenneth Redding Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Darren Clinton Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Darren Clinton Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota v. Charles Kenneth Redding Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- 29 (Minn. App. 2010), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota v. Lorenzo Leontay Washington Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Lorenzo Leontay Washington Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota v. Yatarrie Lee Brown Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Yatarrie Lee Brown Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota v. Yia Her Minn. Ct. App. 2016