DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Delk, 781 N.W.2d 426.

211 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota v. Regina Marie White Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Aaron Morris Swenson Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    “This court will not generally review a district court’s exercise of its discretion to sentence a defendant when the sentence imposed is within the presumptive guidelines range.” rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2010); (noting that only in a “rare case” will a reviewing court overturn a presumptive sentence); (noting that a presumptive sentence will generally not be m
  • State of Minnesota v. Lindsay Rae Shelltrack-Miller Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    State v. Van Ruler , rev. denied (Minn. Jul.
  • State of Minnesota v. Michael Paul Kuklok Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    -29 (Minn. App. 2010), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Nathan Edward Garrett Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    -29 (Minn. App. 2010), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. David NMN Alonzo Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    Generally, we will not disturb a district court’s imposition of a sentence that falls “within the presumptive guidelines range.” d 426, 428 (Minn. App. 2010), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Ajoko Gaye Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    State v. Delk , rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Braylen Justice Miller Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    Moreover, “[t]his court will not generally review a district court’s exercise of its discretion to sentence a defendant when the sentence imposed is within the presumptive guidelines range.” rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Shevirio Kavirion Childs -Young Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    We “will not generally review a district court’s exercise of its discretion to sentence a defendant when the sentence imposed is within the presumptive guidelines range.” rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Anthony Barrett Graham Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    Thus, “[t]his court will generally not exercise its authority to modify a sentence within the presumptive [ sentencing] range absent compelling circumstances.” (citation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Allison Wesley Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    -29 (Minn. App. 2010), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Suvwe Peter Ighovojah Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Brett Thomas Green Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    5 Green suggests that the district court abused its discretion in sentencing him because his criminal-history score was incorrectly calculated.
  • State of Minnesota v. Dorell Monte Young Minn. Ct. App. 2022
    d 426, 428 (Minn. App. 2010), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Mark Daniel Murrell, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
    rev. denied (Minn. 2 On appeal, Murrell does not argue that the district court’s reliance, in part, on an element of the offense for a longer—though still presumptive —sentence is improper.
  • State of Minnesota v. Braxton Monte Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2022
    d 426, 428-29 (Minn. App. 2010), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Ashley Monique Swart Minn. Ct. App. 2022
    “A sentence within the presumptive-sentence range is not a departure from the presumptive sentence but is a presumptive sentence and is generally not subject to appellate review of the district court’s exercise of its discretion.” rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Diedrich Allen Middleton Minn. Ct. App. 2022
    constitutes a presumptive sentence.” rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Norbert Pius D’Cruz Minn. Ct. App. 2022
    constitutes a presumptive sentence.” rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Sonya Faye Olson Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    “This court will not generally review a district court’s exercise of its discretion to sentence a defendant when the se ntence is imposed w ithin the presumptive guidelines range.” State v. Delk , 28 (Minn. App. 2010), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. William Deshawn Paige Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    “This court will not generally review a district court’s exercise of its discretion to sentence a defendant when the sentence im posed is within the presumptive guidelines range.” review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Jose Armando Padilla Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    “This court will not generally review a district court’s exercise of its discretion to sentence a defendant when the sentence imposed is within the presumptive guidelines range.” review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Clinton Angwenyi Omuya Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    constitutes a presumptive sentence.” State v. Delk , review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Bobbie Christine Bishop Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    Our court gives great deference to a district court’s sentence “when 6 the sentence imposed is within the presumptive guidelines range.” State v. Delk , review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Julie Lynn Bigelow Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    Guidelines 1.B.13 (2016); (noting that appellate courts w ill typically not review a district court’s discretionary imposition of a sentence w ithin the presumptive guidelines range), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Christian Hamzah Coleman Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    We “generally will not interfere with sentences that are within the presumptive [guidelines] range,” State v. Freyer , and reverse imposition of 4 presumptive sentences only in “rare” cases, State v. Delk , (quoting State v. Kindem , ), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Cory Anthony Klingelhoets Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    (noting this court seldom overturns presumptive sentences without compelling circumstances) , review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. John Oliver Dybedahl Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    As a general rule, this court will not review a district court’s sentencing discretion “when the sentence imposed is within the presumptive guidelines range.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
  • State of Minnesota v. Anthony Jefferson Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    “Only in a ‘rare’ case will a reviewing court reverse imposition of a presumptive sentence.” (), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Semaj Maurice Dow, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    “Only in a rare case will a reviewing court reverse imposition of a presumptive sentence.” State v. Delk , (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Terrell Reese Schaeffer Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    We generally do not review a district court’s decision to sentence a defendant “within the presumptive guidelines range.” review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Christopher Michael Guzik Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    “Only in a ‘rare’ case will a reviewing court reverse imposition of a presumptive sentence.” (), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Chad Michael Gibson Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    State v. Delk , review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Dayquan Jayru Rain Hodge Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    Guidelines 2.D.1 (2018); 28 (Minn. App. 2010), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010) (“This court will not generally review a district court’s 6 exercise of its discretion to sentence a defendant when the sentence imposed is within the presumptive guidelines range.”).
  • State of Minnesota v. Rashad Ramon Ivy Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    “This court will not generally review a district court’s exercise of its discretion to sentence a defendant when the sentence imposed is within the presumptive guidelines range.” State v. Delk , review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Christy Lynn Tjaden Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    “This court will not generally review a district court’s exercise of its discretion to sentence a defendant when the sentence im posed is within the presumptive guidelines range.” review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Christopher Dwayne Leckner Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Dean Robert Minnerath Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    “Only in a ‘rare’ case will a reviewing court reverse imposition of a presumptive sentence.” d 426, 428 (Minn. App. 2010) (quoting State v. Kindem , ), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Cameron Pierre Richmond, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    “Only in a ‘rare’ case will a reviewing court reverse imposition of a presumptive sentence.” (), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Christopher Michael Loving Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    constitutes a presumptive sentence.” review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Saudi Askari-Habib Miller Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    D E C I S I O N “This court will not generally review a district court’s exercise of its discretion to sentence a defendant when the sentence imposed is within the presumptive guidelines range.” State v. Delk , review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Aaron Duviaze Taylor Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    12 We “will not generally review a district court’s exercise of its discretion to sentence a defendant when the sentence imposed is within the presumptive guidelines range.” review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Varlyn Sharp Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    “We will not generally review a district court’s exercise of its discretion to sentence a defendant when the sentence imposed is within the presumptive guidelines range.” State v. Delk , review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Juan Manuel Ortega-Rodriguez Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Ali Joshua Jalil Robida Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    “This court will not generally review a district court’s exercise of its discretion to sentence a defendant when the sentence 6 imposed is within the presumptive guidelines range.” review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Stevevontae Dellshawn Champion Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    “Only in a ‘rare’ case will a reviewing court reverse imposition of a presumptive sentence.” (), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Monroe Leshawn Harrell Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • Elijah Ahmad Milsap v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    See State v. Delk , 428-29 (Minn. App. 2010), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010) (noting that any sentence within the presumptive range con stitutes a presumptive sentence ) .
  • Chad Domonique Johnson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
  • State of Minnesota v. Joseph Raymond Kost Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    “This court will not generally review a district court’s exercise of its discretion to sentence a defendant when the sentence imposed is within the presumptive guidelines range.” review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).