Cited by

“Standing is a jurisdictional doctrine, and the lack of standing bars consideration of the claim by the court.”

requires that a party have standing before a court can exercise jurisdiction.”

–13 (Minn. 2011); see also Standing, Black’s Law Dictionary 1700 (12th ed. 2024) (“A party’s right to make a legal claim or seek judicial enforcement of a 2 Although the court of appeals dismissed the appeal because it concluded that the district court’s order striking D.A.A.’s motion was not appealable

–13 (Minn. 2011); see also Standing, Black’s Law Dictionary 1700 (12th ed. 2024) (“A party’s right to make a legal claim or seek judicial enforcement of a 2 Although the court of appeals dismissed the appeal because it concluded that the district court’s order striking D.A.A.’s motion was not appealable, the

A party is “aggrieved” by a ruling “[w]hen the adjudication of a court injuriously affects [that] party’s interests.” ().

“Standing to bring an action can be conferred in two ways: either the plaintiff has suffered some injury-in-fact or the plaintiff is the beneficiary of some legislative enactment granting standing.” (quotation omitted).

“Standing is a jurisdictional doctrine, and the lack of standing bars consideration of the claim by the court.”

The Minnesota Parentage Act (MPA), Minn. Stat. §§ 257.51- .75 (2022), provides a “statutory framework for determining parentage.”

Second, the supreme court has repeatedly held that 13 v. Reiter

d 373, 376 (Minn. App. 2011).

requires that a party have standing [to seek relief] before a court can exercise jurisdiction.”

(stating that “[a] party with no interest in the subject of the litigation cannot be aggrieved by the adjudi cation and consequently has no right to appeal”).

The absence of a party’s standing “bars consideration of the claim by the court.”

(stating a party has standing when “that person had a direct interest in the litigation and that person’s rights were injuriously affected by the adjudication” (emphasis added)).

(“Standing is a jurisdictional doctrine, and the lack of standing bars consideration of [a] claim by the court.”).

(“Standing is a jurisdictional doctrine, and the lack of s tanding bars consideration of the claim by the court.

(“The interpretation of .

D. Finally, we are aided by the Parentage Act, Minn. Stat. §§ 257.51–.74, which “provides a statutory framework for determining parentage.”

“Standing is a jurisdiction al doctrine, and the lack of standing bars consideration of [a] claim by the court.”

The necessary injury in fact must be “concrete” and “actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical.” d 509, 512 (Minn. 2011) (quoting Lujon v. Defenders of Wildlife , 504 U.S. 560 –61, 112 S. Ct. 2130, 2136 (1992)).

d 509, 512 (Minn. 2011).