Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. Partnership, 811 N.W.2d 596.

36 citing documents.

In Re: Guardianship of Haley L. Miller Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. P’ship, n.2 (Minn. 2012) (“Summary arguments made without citation to legal support are waived.”).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Stephen Lyle Love Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. P’ship, n.2 (Minn. 2012) (“Summary arguments made without citation to legal support are waived.”); Custom Farm Servs., (stating that appellate courts do not presume error).
In re the Marriage of: Abdihafid Hariri Hassan Yusuf v. Neama Omar Y Al Somali Minn. Ct. App. 2026
An assignment of error in a brief based on “mere assertion” and not supported by argument or authority is waived “unless prejudicial error is obvious on mere inspection.” Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., see also Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. P’ship, n.2 (Minn. 2012) (“Summary arguments made without citation to legal support are waived.”).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Thomas Hurl Bolter Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. P’ship, n.2 (Minn. 2012) (“Summary arguments made without citation to legal support are waived.”).
In re the Marriage of: Lori Ann Chang v. Peter Alan Chang Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Husband argues that the district court erred “as a matter of law by failing to apply the law correctly, and abuse[d] its discretion by failing to allow [him] to view his personal property.” But “[s]ummary arguments without citation to legal support are waived.” Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. P’ship , n.2 (Minn. 2012).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: David Wayne Hamilton Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. P’ship, n.2 (Minn. 2012) (“Summary arguments made without citation to legal support are waived.”).
In Re the Matter of: Reuben Lopez Avery v. Teri Joanne Avery Minn. Ct. App. 2026
And “[s]ummary arguments made without citation to legal support are waived.” Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. P’ship, n.2 (Minn. 2012).
In re the Marriage of: Diana Jakubauskiene v. Robertas Jakubauskas Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“Summary arguments made without citation to legal support are waived.” Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. P’ship, n.2 (Minn. 2012).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Craig Seitzer Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address inadequately briefed issue); Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. P’ship, n.2 3 Seitzer references a transcript that he says shows he “advocated against medications and no need for antipsychotics but a push for therapy” and that he and his doctor at one point agreed there was no need for medication; however, he does not identify the transcript to which he refers and no transcript
Jacob Robuck, et al v. Minnesota Department of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. P’ship, n. 2 (Minn. 2012) (“Summary arguments made without citation to legal support are waived.”).
Arch Insurance Company, as subrogee of Centre Rental, Inc. v. Michael Quistorff Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. P’ship, n.2 (Minn. 2012).
State of Minnesota, by its Attorney General Keith Ellison v. Howard W. Mostad Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. P’ship
Steve Simon, in his official capacity as Minnesota Secretary of State Minn. 2020
Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. P’ship , see Eakman v. Brutger , (“The sole issue on appeal [fr om an order denying a temporary injunction] is whether there was a clear abuse of .
Mark R. Krampf v. University of Minnesota, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“A district court abuses its discretion when it bases its conclu sions on an erroneous interpretation of the applicable law.” Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. P’ship
Joel S. Rabbe, et al v. Farmers State Bank of Trimont, et al., First Financial Bank in Winnebago, … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“A district court abuses its discretion when it bases its conclusions on an erroneous interpretation of the applicable law.” Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. P’ship
Town of West Lakeland v. Karl E. Auleciems, Susanne M. Auleciems, Ethan Auleciems, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Heather Apartments Ltd. P’ship, n.2 (Minn. 2012); see also Ganguli v. Univ.
In Re: The Matter of the Petition for Project No. 77, Clay County Ditch No. 51-Lateral No. 3, … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. P’ship, d 596, 600 n.2 (Minn. 2012) (“Summary arguments made without citation to legal support are waived.”).
Shari Monica Kristo v. David R. Johnson, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. P’ship
The Jonathan Association, and S3 Holdings, LLC, its assignee v. Chase Wirth, John Doe, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“A district court abuses its discretion when it bases its conclusions on an erroneous interpretation of the applicable law.” Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. P’ship
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Joseph Valentyn Minn. Ct. App. 2019
n.2 (Minn. 2012) (“[s]ummary arguments made without citation to legal support are waived”).
Michael John Smude v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Adam Howard Torke Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. P’ship , n.2 (Minn. 2012) (“Summary arguments made without citation to legal support are waived.”).
In re: the Trust Agreement of Eugene L. Johnson u/t/a dated December 22, 2008 In re: the Eugene … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. P’ship, n.2 (Minn. 2012).
Christie v. Estate 911 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 2018
Christie v. Estate 911 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 2018
Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. P'ship , , 600 n.2 (Minn. 2012) ("Summary arguments made without citation to legal support are waived.") (citing State v. Krosch , , 719 (Minn. 2002) ).
State v. Minnesota School of Business, Inc. 899 N.W.2d 467 Minn. 2017
State v. Minnesota School of Business, Inc. 899 N.W.2d 467 Minn. 2017
(applying a de novo standard of review to issues of law presented in an appeal from a summary judgment decision); Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. P’ship, (applying a de novo standard of review to issues of law presented in an appeal from an order for injunctive relief).
In Re the Matter of the Application of: John Doe for a Change of Birthdate to April 10, … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. P’ship , n.2 (Minn. 2012) (declining to consider arguments made without citation to legal support).
In re the Marriage of: Becki Anne Suleski, f/k/a Becki Anne Rupe v. Ryan Michael Rupe 855 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Becki Anne Suleski, f/k/a Becki Anne Rupe v. Ryan Michael Rupe 855 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. P’ship, n.2 (Minn. 2012) (“Summary arguments made without 15 citation to legal support are waived.”); – 34 n.3 (Minn. 2010) (same).
Ken B. Peterson, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry v. United Parcel Service, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Ken B. Peterson, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry v. United Parcel Service, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In other words, “[a] district 6 court abuses its discretion when it bases its conclusions on an erroneous interpretation of the applicable law.” Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. P’ship
Robert W. Weckman, et al v. County of Scott Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Robert W. Weckman, et al v. County of Scott Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. P’ship
Nichols v. State, Office of the Secretary 842 N.W.2d 20 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Nichols v. State, Office of the Secretary 842 N.W.2d 20 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In that event, we would “give words and phrases their plain and ordinary meaning.” Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. P’ship