Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Doe 175 ex rel. Doe 175 v. Columbia Heights School District, ISD No. 13, 842 N.W.2d 38.

64 citing documents.

Mai Lia Xiong, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Dist., ISD No. 13 , (noting that “[i]t is an elementary principle of appellate procedure that a party may not raise an issue or argument for the first time on appeal and thereby seek appellate relief on an issue that was not litigated in the district court”).
Classic Auto Storage, LLC v. Restoration Technologies, Inc Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Classic Auto Storage, LLC v. Restoration Technologies, Inc Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Aaron Olson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Dist., ISD No. 13, (stating “if an appellant fails to preserve an argument or issue in district court proceedings, the issue or argument is forfeited and may not be asserted in an appellate court”).
Daniella Marie Chavez, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Mark Lukens, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Robyn Johnson, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Jerome E. Johnson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. K. and A. S., Parents 9 N.W.3d 174 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. K. and A. S., Parents 9 N.W.3d 174 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Dist., ISD No. 13, -43 (Minn. App. 2014).
James M. Carlson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Dist., n.1 (Minn. App. 2014) (noting that “the preservation requirement prevents litigants from suffering unfair surprise at the appellate level if they had no opportunity to address the issue in the district court”).
Estate of: Donald J. Kellett, a/k/a Donald Jean Kellett, Decedent. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Dist., ISD No. 13, (“It is an elementary principle of appellate procedure that a party may not raise an issue or argument for the first time on appeal and thereby seek appellate relief on an issue that was not litigated in the district court.”).
Alejandro Cruz-Guzman, as guardian and next friend of his minor children, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Dist., ISD No. 13, (quotation omitted).
Candi Lemarr, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Free Minnesota Small Business Coalition, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
SW Partners, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Dist., -43 (Minn. App. 2014).
Town of West Lakeland, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Nancy Leppink, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Dist., ISD No. 13 , (citing Thiele v. Stich , ); see also Thayer v. Am.
Carol Eppolite, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Dist., -43 (Minn. App. 2014).
Charles Wahren, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Christopher Christopherson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Cambria Company LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Dist., d 38, 44 (Minn. App. 2014) ().
In re the Marriage of: Lauri Sue Browning, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Oliver Lenell Dority. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Dist., -45 (Minn. App. 2014).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: H. R. W. and M. D. L., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In the Matter of the Petition of U.S. Bank National Association for a New Certificate of Title after … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
David Berger, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Ricky Ray Evoniuk, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Dist., ISD No. 13, d 38, 43 n.1 (Minn. App. 2014).
In re: Sidney A. Goodman Revocable Trust, U/A/D December 16, 1985 as Amended Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Kirk Alan Fugelseth Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Dist., -43 (Minn. App. 2014).
Scott G. Erickson, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Dist., ISD No. 13, d 38, 43 (Minn. App. 2014).
John Frederick Stolte, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Doe 175 v. Columbia He ights School Dist., -43 (Minn. App. 2014).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. R. K. and O. A. K., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Thiele v. Stich , Doe 1 75 v. Columbia Heights School Dist.
In re the Civil Commitment of Kropp 895 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Civil Commitment of Kropp 895 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Joanna Brooks Benson, f/k/a Joanna Lee Brooks, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Dist., n.1 (Minn. App. 2014).
State of Minnesota v. John Joseph Plevell 889 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. John Joseph Plevell 889 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Dist., (explaining that an appellate court should consider the Gordon factors to the extent that they are appropriate when considering a petition for discretionary review outside of the class-certification context).
Gwender Lagrone Taylor v. Ian W. Taylor, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Gwender Lagrone Taylor v. Ian W. Taylor, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
As a general rule, “this court may consider ‘only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.’” Doe 175 v. Columbia Heights School Dist., (quoting Thayer v. Financial Advisers, Inc., ).
Amanda Jean Lunzer v. State of Minnesota 874 N.W.2d 819 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Amanda Jean Lunzer v. State of Minnesota 874 N.W.2d 819 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Dist., ISD No. 13, d 38, 47 (Minn. App. 2014).
Jane Doe 175, a minor, by her mother and natural guardian, Mother Doe 175 v. Columbia Heights School … 873 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jane Doe 175, a minor, by her mother and natural guardian, Mother Doe 175 v. Columbia Heights School … 873 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Dist., d 38, 40–41, 49 (Minn. App. 2014).
Jay Nygard v. Patrick Walsh Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jay Nygard v. Patrick Walsh Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Dist., & n.1 (Minn. App. 2014) (collecting cases).