Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Doe 175 ex rel. Doe 175 v. Columbia Heights School District, ISD No. 13, 842 N.W.2d 38.

66 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Quenton Tyrone Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Equity Residential Holdings, LLC v. City of Minneapolis Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Dist., ISD No. 13, (“We cannot answer a certified question which is not first decided and explained by the [district] court.” (quotation omitted)).
Mai Lia Xiong v. Derick James Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Marriage of: Todd Charles Sherette v. Melissa Ann Sherette Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Dist., ISD No. 13 , (noting that “[i]t is an elementary principle of appellate procedure that a party may not raise an issue or argument for the first time on appeal and thereby seek appellate relief on an issue that was not litigated in the district court”).
Classic Auto Storage, LLC v. Restoration Technologies, Inc, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Classic Auto Storage, LLC v. Restoration Technologies, Inc, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Aaron Olson v. Matthew Joseph Freeman, et al., Kappa Sigma 5th Street Brothers, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Marriage of: John A Laumann v. Kelly M Laumann Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Dist., ISD No. 13, (stating “if an appellant fails to preserve an argument or issue in district court proceedings, the issue or argument is forfeited and may not be asserted in an appellate court”).
Daniella Marie Chavez v. Fei Zhan Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Mark Lukens, et al v. Snowman Construction, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Robyn Johnson v. Elizabeth Wright, et al., Amit Sela, et al., LiveWell Senior Communities Management, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Jerome E. Johnson v. Stacy A. Bee, Cheryl Steele Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. K. and A. S., Parents 9 N.W.3d 174 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. K. and A. S., Parents 9 N.W.3d 174 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Dist., ISD No. 13, -43 (Minn. App. 2014).
James M. Carlson v. City of Brainerd Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Dist., n.1 (Minn. App. 2014) (noting that “the preservation requirement prevents litigants from suffering unfair surprise at the appellate level if they had no opportunity to address the issue in the district court”).
Estate of: Donald J. Kellett, a/k/a Donald Jean Kellett, Decedent Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Dist., ISD No. 13, (“It is an elementary principle of appellate procedure that a party may not raise an issue or argument for the first time on appeal and thereby seek appellate relief on an issue that was not litigated in the district court.”).
Alejandro Cruz-Guzman, as guardian and next friend of his minor children, et al v. State of Minnesota, et … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Dist., ISD No. 13, (quotation omitted).
Candi Lemarr v. Brown County Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. David William Reynolds Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Harold Specht Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Free Minnesota Small Business Coalition, et al v. Tim Walz Minn. Ct. App. 2021
SW Partners, LLC v. Trade Center Property, LLC, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Dist., -43 (Minn. App. 2014).
Town of West Lakeland v. Karl E. Auleciems, Susanne M. Auleciems, Ethan Auleciems, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Nancy Leppink, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry, et al v. Water Gremlin Company Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Dist., ISD No. 13 , (citing Thiele v. Stich , ); see also Thayer v. Am.
Carol Eppolite v. Dustin James Swenson, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Dist., -43 (Minn. App. 2014).
Charles Wahren v. Kate Radz, a/k/a Katherine Verzhbitska-Radzills Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Christopher Christopherson v. Alpha Service Industries, Incorporated Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Cambria Company LLC v. M&M Creative Laminants Inc. d/b/a M&M Creative Laminates Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Dist., d 38, 44 (Minn. App. 2014) ().
In re the Marriage of: Lauri Sue Browning v. Daniel H. Gruenstein Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Oliver Lenell Dority Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Dist., -45 (Minn. App. 2014).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: H. R. W. and M. D. L., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In the Matter of the Petition of U.S. Bank National Association for a New Certificate of Title after … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
David Berger v. Timothy Wynes, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Ricky Ray Evoniuk v. Springfield Armory XD 9mm- XD19144, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Dist., ISD No. 13, d 38, 43 n.1 (Minn. App. 2014).
In re: Sidney A. Goodman Revocable Trust, U/A/D December 16, 1985 as Amended Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Kirk Alan Fugelseth Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Dist., -43 (Minn. App. 2014).
Scott G. Erickson, et al v. Abby Science, Inc. d/b/a Quality Blending, Inc., et al Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Dist., ISD No. 13, d 38, 43 (Minn. App. 2014).
John Frederick Stolte v. Kathleen Marie Stolte Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Doe 175 v. Columbia He ights School Dist., -43 (Minn. App. 2014).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. R. K. and O. A. K., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Thiele v. Stich , Doe 1 75 v. Columbia Heights School Dist.
In re the Civil Commitment of Kropp 895 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Civil Commitment of Kropp 895 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Joanna Brooks Benson, f/k/a Joanna Lee Brooks v. Carl Grant Peterson Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Dist., n.1 (Minn. App. 2014).
State of Minnesota v. John Joseph Plevell 889 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. John Joseph Plevell 889 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Dist., (explaining that an appellate court should consider the Gordon factors to the extent that they are appropriate when considering a petition for discretionary review outside of the class-certification context).
Gwender Lagrone Taylor v. Ian W. Taylor, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Gwender Lagrone Taylor v. Ian W. Taylor, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
As a general rule, “this court may consider ‘only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.’” Doe 175 v. Columbia Heights School Dist., (quoting Thayer v. Financial Advisers, Inc., ).
Amanda Jean Lunzer v. State of Minnesota 874 N.W.2d 819 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Amanda Jean Lunzer v. State of Minnesota 874 N.W.2d 819 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Dist., ISD No. 13, d 38, 47 (Minn. App. 2014).
Jane Doe 175, a minor, by her mother and natural guardian, Mother Doe 175 v. Columbia Heights School … 873 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jane Doe 175, a minor, by her mother and natural guardian, Mother Doe 175 v. Columbia Heights School … 873 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Dist., d 38, 40–41, 49 (Minn. App. 2014).