Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Abshir Abtidon Barrow v. State of Minnesota, 862 N.W.2d 686.

50 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Tieshawn Stevie Fields Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Tieshawn Stevie Fields Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Reginald Scott Hubbard, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
d 686, 689 (Minn. 2015).
State of Minnesota, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“A manifest injustice exists if a guilty plea is not valid.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“A manifest injustice exists if a guilty plea is not valid.”
State of Minnesota, by Spring Valley Friends, LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
The specific “meaning of a word depends on how it is being used in context.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“A manifest injustice exists if a guilty plea is not valid.”
Brian Matthew Nash, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“A manifest injustice exists if a guilty plea is not valid.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“A manifest injustice exists if a guilty plea is not valid.”
Anthony Emerson Howson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Dinesh Mongar, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2022
ANALYSIS “Determining the validity of a guilty plea presents a question of law subject to de novo review.”
Carvin Buzzell, Jr., Minn. 2022
The specific “meaning of a word depends on how it is being used in context.” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2022
Christopher Lee Haugen, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2021
See generally Barrow v. State , (explaining that the statutory prohibition on sales (including offers) of controlled substances serves to disincentivize the drug trade); State v. Olhausen , –28 (Minn. 2004) (noting that the simulated controlled substances law addresses the common problem of substituti ng non
Christopher Paul Mattson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Barrow v. State , 2 Mattson challenges only the accuracy of his plea.
Jalisa Yvette Crosby, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Lonnie Har Larson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Manifest-Injustice Standard Under the manifest-injustice standard, Jones argues that her g uilty plea was not voluntary because it was induced b y the state’s unfulfilled pro mise that she would be 5 released from custody on the day that she entered her plea.3 “A manifest injustice exists if a guilty plea is not valid.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“A manifest injustice exists if a guilty plea is not valid.” Barrow v. State , .
State v. Mike 919 N.W.2d 103 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Mike 919 N.W.2d 103 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Barrow v. State , , 689 (Minn. 2015).
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Selling” or “to sell” means “to give up (property) to another for money or other valuable consideration.” Barrow v. State , (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
The supreme court again addressed Carithers in Barrow v. State, a case in which a defendant was allowed to withdraw his guilty plea to sale of a controlled substance because the defendant’s admission that he gave cocain e to his wife so she could hide it did not constitute a “sale.” 690 n. 2 (Minn. 2015).
State v. Mikulak 903 N.W.2d 600 Minn. 2017
State v. Mikulak 903 N.W.2d 600 Minn. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Appellant relies on two cases, to argue that his actions did not constitute a sale.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A manifest injustice exis ts if a guilty plea is not valid.”
Patrick Samuel Meszaros v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Patrick Samuel Meszaros v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A manifest injustice exists if a guilty plea is not valid.”
Lane Francis Weitzel v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 2016
Lane Francis Weitzel v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Scotty William Polchow Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Scotty William Polchow Minn. Ct. App. 2016
The factual basis is ordinarily established “by asking the defendant to express in his own words what happened.” see also Minn. R. Crim.
Jeffrey Edward Morey v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jeffrey Edward Morey v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A manifest injustice exists if a guilty plea is not valid.”
State of Minnesota v. Warren Fred Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Taylor Rod Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Warren Fred Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Taylor Rod Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“The district court typically establishes a factual basis by asking the defendant to express in his own words what happened.” see also Minn. R. Crim.
State of Minnesota v. Sheikh Nyane Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Sheikh Nyane Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Miranda Lynn Jones 869 N.W.2d 24 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Miranda Lynn Jones 869 N.W.2d 24 Minn. 2015