Cited by

A criminal “defendant does not have an absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea.”

Although a defendant “does not have an absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea,” a district court may permit a defendant to withdraw a plea if “necessary to correct a manifest injustice” or “if it is fair and just to do so.” Minn. R. Crim.

“The defendant has ‘the burden of advancing reasons to support withdrawal’; the state has the burden of showing the prejudice that would be caused by withdrawal.” (quoting Raleigh, d at 97).

The fair-and-just standard is “a less demanding standard than the manifest-injustice standard, but it does not permit withdrawal of a guilty plea for simply any reason.” (quotation omitted).

than the manifest-injustice standard 1, but it does not permit withdrawal of a guilty plea for simply any reason.” (quotation omitted) .

“Under the fair-and-just standard, a court considers the reasons a defendant offers to support withdrawal of a guilty plea and the prejudice to the state should withdrawal be permitted.” d 758, 764 (Minn. App. 2015).

than the manifest-injustice standard, but it does not permit withdrawal of ‘a guilty plea for simply any reason.’” (d 643, 646 (Minn. 2007)).

2 Based on this determination we do not consider Moran’s argument that he is entitled to withdraw his plea under the fair -and-just standard, which is “a less demanding standard than the manifest -injustice standard .” (quotation omitted).

“Under the fair-and-just standard, a court considers the reasons a defendant offers to support withdrawal of a guilty plea and the prejudice to the state should withdrawal be permitted.”

“Under the fair -and-just standard, a court considers the reasons a defendant offers to support withdrawal of a guilty plea and the preju dice to the state should withdrawal be permitted.”

The fair-and-just standard is less demanding than the manifest-injustice sta ndard, but does not permit withdrawal “for simply any reason.” ().

The fair -and-just standard is “a less demanding standard than the manifest-injustice standard, but it does not 6 permit withdrawal of a guilty plea for simply any reason.” d 758, 764 (Minn. App. 2015) (quotation omitted).

The fair-and-just standard is “a less demanding standard than the manifest-injustice standard, but it does not permit withdrawal of a guilty plea fo r simply any reason.” (quotation omitted).

The fair-and-just standard is “a less demanding standard than the manifest-injustice standard, but it does not permit withdrawal of a guilty plea for simply any reason.” State 6 v. Townsend, (quotation omitted).

“The defendant has the burden of advancing reasons to sup port withdrawal; the state has the burden of showing the prejudice that would be caused by withdrawal.” (quotation omitted).

“The plain language of the [aiding-an-offender] 5 statute does not require conviction of a criminal act; rather, a person must commit a criminal act.”2 (considering whether a verdict of not guilty in the offenders’ trial rendered Townsend’s guilty plea to aiding an offender inaccurate).

.” (“[A]ssessment of witness credibility is a jury function.”).

ch provides: “At any time the court must allow a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea 4 upon a timely motion and proof to the satisfaction of the court that withdrawal is necessary to correct a manifest injustice.” “A manifest injustice exists if a guilty plea is not valid.” d 758, 761 (Minn. App. 2015).