Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Muschik v. Conner-Muschik, 920 N.W.2d 215.

23 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Laura Marie Knutsen v. Peder Nels Knutsen Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A24-0675 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Whether property is marital or nonmarital is a question of law, but a reviewing court must defer to the district court’s underlying findings of fact.” (quotation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Muschik v. Conner -Muschik
In re the Estate of Margaret Peteler Bush, a/k/a Margaret Bush Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Estate of Margaret Peteler Bush, a/k/a Margaret Bush Minn. Ct. App. 2024
The procedural fairness of antenuptial agreements is governed by both common-law and statutory standards.” (quotations and citations omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Bette Lou Gubbe Slag, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Whether property is marital or nonmarital is a question of law, but a reviewing court must defer to the district court’s underlying findings of fact.” (quotation omitted).
Lisa Ann Poseley v. Andrew Scott Duff, and Lisa Ann Poseley on Behalf of Minor ... Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Lisa Ann Poseley v. Andrew Scott Duff, and Lisa Ann Poseley on Behalf of Minor ... Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A22-1261 Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Haefele v. Haefele , (child-support modification) ; (parenting-time modification) ; (need-based attorney fees).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Muschik v. Conner-Muschik
In re the Marriage of: Jessica Elizabeth Solinsky, n/k/a Jessica Elizabeth Grimm, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: John Thomas Peterson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(“A district court must award attorney fees and costs to enable a party to carry on or contest the proceeding, provided it finds” the standard for need-based fees is met).
In re the Marriage of: Jeffrey Scott Jovaag, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: John A. Laumann, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(emphasizing that district court s must award fees and costs if a party meets statutory requirements).
William Gunder Reppe Jr., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Muschik v. Conner -Muschik
In re the Marriage of: Mary Ann Fenlon, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See Muschik v. Conner -Muschik, d 215, 225 (Minn. App. 2018) (“A district court must award attorney fees and costs to enable a party to carry on or contest the proceeding, provided it finds” the standard for need-based fees is met).
In re the Custody of: N. Y. B., James Edward Bono, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Kristine Ann Spratt Hansen, n/k/a Kristine Ann Spratt, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Jill Melisa Sinda, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“That the record might support different findings does not render them defective.”
Princeton Auto Center Inc. DLR 22118, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“For a gift to be valid, there must be dona tive intent, delivery, and absol ute disposition of the property.”