Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Muschik v. Conner-Muschik, 920 N.W.2d 215.

24 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Julie Karen Johnson v. Thomas Francis Johnson, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In re the Marriage of: Laura Marie Knutsen v. Peder Nels Knutsen Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In re the Marriage of: Diana Jakubauskiene v. Robertas Jakubauskas Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In re the Marriage of: Oliver Wilfred Cass v. YeYing Cen Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Marriage of: Nicole Onori Hansen v. Jay Ralph Hansen Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Whether property is marital or nonmarital is a question of law, but a reviewing court must defer to the district court’s underlying findings of fact.” (quotation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Linda Beth Krelitz v. Michael James Krelitz Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Muschik v. Conner -Muschik
In re the Estate of Margaret Peteler Bush, a/k/a Margaret Bush, Deceased Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Estate of Margaret Peteler Bush, a/k/a Margaret Bush, Deceased Minn. Ct. App. 2024
The procedural fairness of antenuptial agreements is governed by both common-law and statutory standards.” (quotations and citations omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Bette Lou Gubbe Slag v. David Alan Slag Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Whether property is marital or nonmarital is a question of law, but a reviewing court must defer to the district court’s underlying findings of fact.” (quotation omitted).
A23-0219 Lisa Ann Poseley v. Andrew Scott Duff, and Lisa Ann Poseley on Behalf of Minor Children, vs. … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A23-0219 Lisa Ann Poseley v. Andrew Scott Duff, and Lisa Ann Poseley on Behalf of Minor Children, vs. … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Marriage of: Heather Grace Robbins v. Jeremy Jay Robbins, and Washington County Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Haefele v. Haefele , (child-support modification) ; (parenting-time modification) ; (need-based attorney fees).
In re the Marriage of: Pamela Delice Skeens v. Adel R. Baqir Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Muschik v. Conner-Muschik
In re the Marriage of: Jessica Elizabeth Solinsky, n/k/a Jessica Elizabeth Grimm v. Joseph Clark Solinsky Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: John Thomas Peterson v. Colleen Marie Peterson Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(“A district court must award attorney fees and costs to enable a party to carry on or contest the proceeding, provided it finds” the standard for need-based fees is met).
In re the Marriage of: Jeffrey Scott Jovaag v. Melissa Jo Helene Jovaag Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: John A. Laumann v. Kelly M. Laumann Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(emphasizing that district court s must award fees and costs if a party meets statutory requirements).
William Gunder Reppe Jr. v. Karen Beckers Reppe Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Muschik v. Conner -Muschik
In re the Marriage of: Mary Ann Fenlon v. Steven Robert Fenlon Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See Muschik v. Conner -Muschik, d 215, 225 (Minn. App. 2018) (“A district court must award attorney fees and costs to enable a party to carry on or contest the proceeding, provided it finds” the standard for need-based fees is met).
In re the Custody of: N. Y. B., James Edward Bono v. Megan Yvonne Hedberg Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Kristine Ann Spratt Hansen, n/k/a Kristine Ann Spratt v. Christopher Patrick Hansen Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Jill Melisa Sinda v. Richard Joseph Sinda Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In the Matter of: Kathryn Marie Larson, on behalf of Minor Child v. Keith Norman Marohn Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“That the record might support different findings does not render them defective.”
Princeton Auto Center Inc. DLR 22118 v. 2010 Chevrolet Silverado Crew Cab Pickup, VIN#3GCRKSE37AG123890, MN License Plate 511THX Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“For a gift to be valid, there must be dona tive intent, delivery, and absol ute disposition of the property.”