Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Crosby v. Crosby, 587 N.W.2d 292.

100 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Corey Andrew Stern v. Rachel Ruth Stern Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“An equitable division of marital property is not necessarily an equal division.” rev .
In re the Marriage of: Angie Lynn Magnuson Swierzewski v. David Matthew Swierzewski Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“An equitable division of marital property is not necessarily an equal division.” rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In the Marriage of: Sahra Ali v. Idriss Hassan Ibrahim, County of Lyon, Intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“An equitable division of marital property is not necessarily an equal division.” d 292, 297 (Minn. App. 1998), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In the Marriage of: Karen Dennie v. Ricky Dennie Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“An equitable division of marital property is not necessarily an equal division.” rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Oluwafunbi Ige Olusina v. Ann Oludolapo Olusina Minn. Ct. App. 2025
1, and “[a]n equitable division of marital property is not necessarily an equal division.” rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In the Marriage of: Michael Kwabena Asiedu v. Gladys Barkey Asiedu Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Custody of A.W.W: Nicholas Taylor Wehrwein v. Patricia Katrine Hascall Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Custody of A.W.W: Nicholas Taylor Wehrwein v. Patricia Katrine Hascall Minn. Ct. App. 2024
7(d) (stating tax- dependency exemptions must not be allocated to “[a] party with less than ten percent of court-ordered parenting time” unless the parties otherwise agree); 298 (Minn. App. 1998) (awarding father tax-dependency exemptions despite mother’s status as the primary physical custodian), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Matter of: Zoraba Ross v. Angel Raeleen Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Matter of: Zoraba Ross v. Angel Raeleen Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-96 (Minn. App. 1998), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Renee Caroline McGeary v. John Patrick McGeary Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“An equitable division of marital property is not necessarily an equal division.” rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
A23-0219 Lisa Ann Poseley v. Andrew Scott Duff, and Lisa Ann Poseley on Behalf of Minor Children, vs. … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A23-0219 Lisa Ann Poseley v. Andrew Scott Duff, and Lisa Ann Poseley on Behalf of Minor Children, vs. … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
This decision “rests almost entirely within the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed absent a clear abuse of discretion.” rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Jerry Arthur McDonald v. Donna Arnela McDonald, n/k/a Donna Arnela Rosenblad Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-97 (Minn. App. 1998), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Jessica Elizabeth Solinsky, n/k/a Jessica Elizabeth Grimm v. Joseph Clark Solinsky Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“[W]hile the district court must make a just and equitable 3 division of the [parties’] marital property, ‘[a]n equitable division of marital property is not necessarily an equal division.’” ( rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Janie Warren Berg v. David A. Berg Minn. Ct. App. 2021
d 292, 296-97 (Minn. App. 1998), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Andrew Lowe Billett v. RuthAnne Billett Minn. Ct. App. 2020
1, “rests almost entirely within the discretion of the trial court an d will not be disturbed absent a clear abuse of discretion.” Crosby v. Crosby , (quo tation omitted), review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Francis Stephen Gill v. Gretchen Zwakman Gill Minn. Ct. App. 2020
18 “Equitable, not equal, division of marital property is required.” Crosby v. Crosby , review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Donald Henry Off v. Sandra Lee Off, n/k/a/ Sandra Lee Dodgson Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Crosby v. Crosby , review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Matter of: Tonia Lynn McRunnel and on behalf of minor children v. Adam Joseph McRunnel Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Crosby v. Crosby , review denied (Minn. Feb.
In the Marriage of: Debra Lynn Ober v. Randall Lane Ober Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Crosby v. Crosby , review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Faye Karen Bernstein (A18-1402) (A18-1408) v. Scott Tomi Gilbert (A18-1402) (A18-1408) Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Crosby v. Crosby , -97 (Minn. App. 1998), review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Marie Tiedke, nka Kathleen Marie Freitag v. Alex Lee Tiedke Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“An equitable division of marital property is not necessarily an equal division.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Lakmini Yamuna Herath v. Susantha Herath Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“An award of attorney fees rests almost entirely within the discretion of the trial court and will not b e disturbed absent a clear abu se of discretion.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Denise Marie Kienholz v. Douglas Floyd Kienholz Minn. Ct. App. 2019
.”); (recognizing presumption of marital property requires party challenging that status to “demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that the property is non - marital”), review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Amy Alyssa Post v. Samuel Morton Post, III Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Camilla Renae Lee v. Lyndon Carson Lee Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Crosby v. Crosby , review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Marcus Shuntae Pope v. Angela Kelly Pope Minn. Ct. App. 2019
For example, appellant argues that “the [d]istrict [c]ourt erred in conflating the issue of potential alienation—which [] related to parenting time—with legal custody” review denied (Minn. Feb.
Patrick Hugh Stack, et al v. Lamont Green, Elvis Austin Butler, et al. Below Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Feb.
In the Matter of the Welfare of: D. V.-L., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(affirming trial court’s findings although appellant’s version of the facts may have led another trier of fact to make different findings).
In re the Marriage of: Danielle M. Kerr, n/k/a Danielle M. Dubois v. Jonathan R. Kerr, County of … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
And even if there is evidence in the record that could support other findings, the fact “[t]hat the record might support findings other t han those made by the trial court does not show that the 8 court’s findings are defective.” Vangsness v. Vangsness , (stating that although appellant’ s recitat ion of facts “might prompt another trier of fact to different findings, because there is sufficient contradictory evidence to reasonably support the tri al court’s findings,” appellant’ s evidence “ do
In re the Marriage of: Mandeep Singh Sodhi v. Leisa Lynn-Ketelsen Sodhi Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“An equitable division of marital property is not necessarily an equal division.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Jennifer Ann Peterson n/k/a Jennifer Ann Hirschey v. Kevin John Peterson Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Olson v. Olson , Crosby v. Crosby , review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Jennifer Kristin Gorney v. Keith Joseph Gorney Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“An award of attorney fees rests almost entirely within the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed absent a clear abuse of discretion.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Julia Ellen Conlon v. Gregory Dean Conlon Minn. Ct. App. 2017
The district court must make findings regarding the division of marital property, and the division must be “just and equitable.” (citing Minn. Stat. § 518.58, subd.
In re the Marriage of: Teresa Marie Nordahl v. Steven Edward Nordahl Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“An award of attorney fees rests almost entirely within the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed absent a clear abuse of discretion.” Crosby v. Crosby , (quotation 11 omitted), review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Matter of: Birch Benjamin Hansen v. Suzanne Christine Todnem 891 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Matter of: Birch Benjamin Hansen v. Suzanne Christine Todnem 891 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(“The code does not preclude state district courts from allocating tax dependency exemptions to a noncustodial parent incident to the determination of child support and physical custody.”); 296–98 (Minn. App. 1998) (awarding dependency exemption to father despite fact that mother was designated as primary physical custodian, physical care was equally divided between parents, and mother had substantial financial resources), review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Jean Rucker v. Kraig Vernon Rucker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Jean Rucker v. Kraig Vernon Rucker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-97 (Minn. App. 1998) (finding that appellant failed to trace claimed nonmarital interests in a case in which funds were commingled and appellant only showed her funds were the “primary source” for acquiring certain assets), review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: David Scott Pederson v. Elizabeth Joan Pederson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Reno L. Brandt v. Jessie J. Johnson, f/k/a Jessie J. Brandt Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Reno L. Brandt v. Jessie J. Johnson, f/k/a Jessie J. Brandt Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: David Scott Pederson v. Elizabeth Joan Pederson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“An equitable division of marital property is not necessarily an equal division.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Stephanie Kay Nelson v. Steven John Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Stephanie Kay Nelson v. Steven John Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“An equitable division of marital property is not 5 necessarily an equal division.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Beth Carolyn Potter v. Joseph Leroy Potter Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Beth Carolyn Potter v. Joseph Leroy Potter Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: James Walter Shaw v. Barbara Ann Shaw Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: James Walter Shaw v. Barbara Ann Shaw Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Feb.