Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Witchell v. Witchell, 606 N.W.2d 730.

52 citing documents.

Erika Cappiello v. Andrew John Whitney Minn. Ct. App. 2026
4 to support his assertion that the district court clearly erred by finding that his uninvited apartment visit was one of the repeated incidents of harassment.
Lisa Marie Parkos v. David Andrew Sandbeck Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Corey Gregory Crowe and OBO Minor Children v. Lila Crowe Minn. Ct. App. 2024
at 844; (stating that an ex -husband’s criticism of his ex-wife’s parenting decisions was not harassment).
Susan Patricia Evans v. Aaron Lee Couch Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(concluding that, when reading statements in context, an “inappropriate and argumentative” statement may not be “intended to adversely affect the safety, security, or privacy” of another).
Corey Lamont Holiday for Self and OBO Vulnerable Adult v. Kia Angel Barnes Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Allison Marie Wolf v. John Roman Schmainda Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Allison Marie Wolf v. John Roman Schmainda Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(determining that district court clearly erred in finding that husband’s comments in a visitation notebook, used to communicate about shared children, were “intrusive or that they were intended to adversely affect the safety, security, or privacy of wife”).
Todd Brian Kerber v. Anna Renee McKinnon Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- 21 (Minn. App. 1995) (requiring written or oral findings for an order for protection); - 32 (Minn. App. 2000) (citing Mechtel in an HRO appeal); Minn. R. Civ.
Heidi Lee Wolf v. Bradley Athmann Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Katherine Dillard Rice Hayes v. Augustus Conrade Thomas Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Kallys Albert Sr. v. Allen Eduardo Diaz Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Sarah Anne Trisko, and o/b/o Minor Children v. Karen Mary Hartung Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Heather Mary Zigan v. Louis Leroy Gray Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Amanda Marie Van Ryswyk v. Joshua Thomas Van Ryswyk, and Joshua Thomas Van Ryswyk, vs. Amanda Marie Van … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Emily Mae Peterson v. Scott Howard Meyer Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Matthew James Beland v. Heidi Hamre-Rylander (A20-0957), Kurtis Rylander (A20-0958) Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Peter Richard Rickmyer v. Mimmie Woodall Minn. Ct. App. 2021
at 843; -32 (Minn. App. 2000).
Staples-Motley School District (A19-0466), Paul David Anderson (A19-0468) v. Dave Johnson, a/k/a David Kenneth Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Jenna Marie Bjerke v. Dan Naweto Flomo Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Kush, d at 843; -32 (Minn. App. 2000).
Emily Peterson v. Scott Howard Meyer Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Jason McKenzie v. Aaron Louis Olson Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Rebecca Anderson v. Benjamin Busse Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Carly Jaye Nelson v. Oscar Ivan Garcia Medina Minn. Ct. App. 2019
According to him, his treatment of Nelson was “merely inappropriate and argumentative” and thus “insufficient to rise to the level of harassment.” d 502, 503 (Minn. App. 2002) () (dicta).
Tara Ann Nesmoe-Thompson v. Neil V. Lindemann, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(holding that the district court abused its discretion by grant i n g a n H R O w h e r e t h e appellant’s conduct was not intrusive and did not adversely affect the respondent).
Tracy Leigh Thompson o/b/o D. X. T v. David Winfred Thompson Minn. Ct. App. 2018
James Michael Olsen, Krisann Jeanne Olsen v. James Robert Greger Minn. Ct. App. 2017
29, 2004); a de novo standard of review to a district court’s conclusions of law, and an abuse-of-discretion standard of review to a district court’s decision to issue an HRO based on a finding that a person has engaged in harassment , Witchell v. Witchell , -32 (Minn. App. 2000).
Neegonee Brunner v. Leigh Anna Harper Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Sarah Yule v. Jan Kehlenbeck Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(stating that an ex-husband’s criticis m of his ex-wife’s parenting decisions and stating he wanted joint legal and physical custody of the children was not harassment).
Mackenzie Hanson v. Austin Alexander Burridge Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Troy Kenneth Scheffler v. Mark Joseph McDonough Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Samantha Raye Meyer v. Robert J. Harley Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Samantha Raye Meyer v. Robert J. Harley Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(examining comments written by husband “in context” in concluding statements were not harassment).
Nathan Gregor, et al v. Dawn Marie Buttera Gregor Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Nathan Gregor, et al v. Dawn Marie Buttera Gregor Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Joyce Sammon v. Kim Halvorson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Joyce Sammon v. Kim Halvorson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See, d 730, 732 (Minn. App. 2000) (reading “in context” a father’s allegedly harassing statements toward a mother in a visitation notebook, concluding that the statements did not constitute harassing conduct).
Cathie J. Pascavage v. Donald Mackay Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Cathie J. Pascavage v. Donald Mackay Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Mark Michael Dwyer v. Tamara Jo Molde Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Mark Michael Dwyer v. Tamara Jo Molde Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Tyler VanCamp, et al v. Tracey VanCamp Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Tyler VanCamp, et al v. Tracey VanCamp Minn. Ct. App. 2015
at 844 (“In addition to its findings regarding the two specific incidents, the district court 3 found that appellant’s other harassing conduct gave context to an ongoing situation.”); (reading “in context” father’s allegedly harassing statements toward mother in a visitation notebook).
Peter Wells Fischer v. Gene A. Rechtzigel Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Peter Wells Fischer v. Gene A. Rechtzigel Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Peterson v. Johnson 755 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Peterson v. Johnson 755 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Kush, d at 843 ; -32 (Minn.App.2000).
Kush v. Mathison 683 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Kush v. Mathison 683 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Roer v. Dunham 682 N.W.2d 179 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Roer v. Dunham 682 N.W.2d 179 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Roer argues that the court has the authority to extend a restraining order based on a continuing pattern of harassment by the person subject to the order.