Cited by

A district court’s factual findings “will not be reversed unless clearly erroneous or unsupported by substantial evidence.”

“Findings in a CHIPS proceeding will not be reversed unless clea rly erroneous or unsupported by substantial evidence.” .

Thus, as in other CHIPS proceedings, we conclude that the district court’s findings “will not be reversed unless clearly erroneous or unsupported by substantial evidence.”

A finding is clearly erroneous if “ the review of the entire record leaves the court with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” (quotation omitted).

A district court’s individual fact-findings will not be reversed “unless the review of the entire record leaves the court with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” (quotation omitted).

( citation and quotations omitted).

“Findings in a CHIPS proceeding will not be reversed unless clearly erroneous or unsupported by substantial evidence.”

“Findings in a CHIPS proceedings will not be reversed unless clearly erroneous or unsupported by substantial evidence.”

d 776, 778 (Minn. App. 1998).

“Findings in a CHIPS proceeding will not be reversed unless clearly erroneous or unsupported by substantial evidence.”

“Findings in a CHIPS proceeding will not be reversed unless clearly erroneous,” meaning that the reviewing court is left “with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” (quotation omitted).

“Findings in a CHIPS proceeding will not be reversed unless clearly erroneous,” meaning that the reviewing court is left “with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” (quotation omitted).

A child’s absences must be attributable to the parent to be educational neglect, but there is a statutory presumption that a child’s absence is attributable to the parent.