Cited by

Louis County, (quotation 5 omitted).

Louis County, (stating that a prima facie case is “one that prevails in the absence of evidence invalidating it” (quotation omitted)).

Louis County, (recognizing that “when the acts or omissions complained of are within the general knowledge and experience of lay persons, expert testimony is not necessary to establish a standard of care, even in cases of alleged medical malpractice” (quotation omitted)).

Louis County, (noting a prima facie case is “one that prevails in the absence of evidence invalidating it”) (quotation omitted)).

Louis Cnty., (determining that the district court erred in granting a motion to dismiss by focusing on defendant-medical provider’s rebuttal of plaintiff’s medical -malpractice action, rather than focusing on whether plaintiff established a prima facie case).

Louis County, 59 (Minn. 2000) (stating that a prima facie case “means one that prevails in the absence of evidence invalidating it” (quotation omitted)).

Louis County, n.1 (Minn. 2000) (noting that a medical malpractice claim is simply a claim “against health care providers for failing to exercise that standard of care required of them in care and treatment”); Plutshack v. Univ.

Louis County, quoting, in turn, ).

Louis County, (quotation omitted).

Louis County, (“[A] prima facie case simply means one that prevails in the absence of evidence invalidating it.

Louis Cnty., (quotation omitted), d 502, 507-08 (Minn. 2022) (stating that a party makes a prima facie case “by alleging facts that, if true, would provide sufficient grounds for [the relief sought]”).

Louis County, (stating that a prima facie case is “one that prevails in the absence of evidence invalidating it” (quotation omitted)); n.2 (Minn. 2012) (noting that the term “prima facie case” is a term of art that “does not always carry the same meaning in every context

Louis County , (stating that a prima facie case is “one that prevails in the absence of evidence invalidating it” (quotati on omitted)).

Louis County, (stating that a prima facie case is “one that prevails in the absence of evidence invalidating it” (quotation omitted)).

Louis County , (stating that a prima facie case is “one that prevails in the absence of evidence invalidating it” (quotation omitted)).

Louis County, (stating that prima facie case is “one that prevails in the absence of evidence invalidating it .” (quotation omitted)).

Louis County , (stating that a prim a facie case is “one that prevails in the 9 absence of evidence invalidating it” (quotation omitted)).

Louis Cty., (quotation omitted).

Louis Cnty., (stating that the district court’s analysis “related to the [defendants’] rebuttal of [plaintiff’s] case, not whether [plaintiff] established a prima facie case”); review denied (Minn. Apr.

Louis Cty., (reviewing de novo such an issue in a medical malpractice case).

Louis Cnty., (quotation omitted); see also Black’s Law Dictionary 1310 (9th ed. 2009) (defining “prima facie case” as “[a] party’s production of enough evidence to allow the fact-trier to infer the fact at issue and rule in the party’s favor”).

Louis County, (quotation omitted).