Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Whitehead v. Moonlight Nursing Care, Inc., 529 N.W.2d 350.

26 citing documents.

Maureen A. Wobig, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“When the parties have presented conflicting evidence on the record, [an appellate court] must defer to the [ULJ’s] ability to weigh the evidence.” Whitehead v. Moonlight Nursing Care, Inc.
Andrew Schaffhausen, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
When the record contains conflicting evidence, we must defer to the ULJ’s weighing of that evidence and “may not weigh [the] evidence on review.” Whitehead v. Moonlight Nursing Care, Inc.
Steven A. Franklin, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Fredric A. Wilson, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Whitehead v. Moonlight Nursing Care, Inc.
Chad Wosmek, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
The court “may not weigh that evidence on review.”
Augustine M. Togba, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“When the parties have presented conflicting evidence on the record, this court must defer to the [ULJ’s] ability to weigh the evidence; we may not weigh that evidence on review.” Whitehead v. Moonlight Nursing Care, Inc.
Donald D. Kern, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“When the parties have presented conflicting evidence on the record, [an appellate court] must defer to the [ULJ’s] ability to weigh the evidence.” Whitehead v. Moonlight Nursing Care, Inc.
Cassie McDuffie, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
This court also defers to the ULJ’s weighing of conflicting evidence and “may not weigh that evidence on review.” Whitehead v. Moonlight Nursing Care, Inc., d 350, 352 (Minn. App. 1995).
Tamer K. Embaby, Relator v. Department of Treasury, Department of Employment and Economic Development, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Tamer K. Embaby, Relator v. Department of Treasury, Department of Employment and Economic Development, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
But “[w]hen the parties have presented conflicting evidence on the record, [we] must defer to the [ULJ’s] ability to weigh the evidence; we may not weigh that evidence on review.” Whitehead v. Moonlight Nursing Care, Inc.
Shura Johnson, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
We defer to the ULJ’s ability to weigh conflicting evidence, and we “may not weigh that evidence on review.” Whitehead v. Moonlight Nursing Care, Inc.
Philljeral Glekiah, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“When the parties have presented conflicting evidence on the record, [we] must defer to the [ULJ’s] ability to weigh the evidence.” Whitehead v. Moonlight Nursing Care, Inc.
Teresa McDonald, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“When the parties have presented conflicting evidence on the record, [we] must defer to the [ULJ’s] ability to weigh the evidence; we may not weigh that evidence on review.” Whitehead v. Moonlight Nursing Care, Inc.
Dennis Freeman, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Whitehead v. Moonlight Nursing Care, Inc.
Nathan M. Christenson, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Whitehead v. Moonlight Nursing Care, Inc.
Bruce F. Filson DDS PA, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Whitehead v. Moonlight Nursing Care, Inc.
In Re the Temporary Immediate Suspension of the Family Child Care License of Strecker 777 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
In Re the Temporary Immediate Suspension of the Family Child Care License of Strecker 777 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
See Whitehead v. Moonlight Nursing Care, Inc., (when parties have presented conflicting evidence on the record, the commissioner has the ability to weigh the evidence).
Nichols v. Reliant Engineering & Manufacturing, Inc. 720 N.W.2d 590 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Nichols v. Reliant Engineering & Manufacturing, Inc. 720 N.W.2d 590 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Whitehead v. Moonlight Nursing Care, Inc.
Johnson v. Walch & Walch, Inc. 696 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Johnson v. Walch & Walch, Inc. 696 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Whitehead v. Moonlight Nursing Care, Inc.
Vargas v. Northwest Area Foundation 673 N.W.2d 200 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Vargas v. Northwest Area Foundation 673 N.W.2d 200 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Whitehead v. Moonlight Nursing Care, Inc.
Johnson v. Dolphin Staffing 614 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Johnson v. Dolphin Staffing 614 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
See, e.g., Valenty v. Medical Concepts Dev., Inc., (holding that a claimant who accepted unsuitable employment was not disqualified from receiving benefits for subsequently terminating that employment); Whitehead v. Moonlight Nursing Care, Inc., (concluding claimant was not disqualified for refusing to accept a new assignment from temporary employer where employer only left a message and never contacted claimant personally); (finding claimant was not disqualified