Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Waters v. Fiebelkorn, 13 N.W.2d 461.
- Christopher S. Chaudhry, Relator v. Mystic Lake Casino, Department of Employment and Economic Development,... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-
Edward B. Berkner, Trustee of Berkner Living Trust, et al., Appellants,
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
[And] the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.” -65 (Minn. 1944).
-
GEP XI Maple Grove LLC, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
[and] the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.” - 65 (Minn. 1944).
-
In the Marriage of:
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
mon, (stating that “[w]hen there is an evidentiary hearing, we are not able to review a party’s argument that the other party did not prove its claims if no transcript is ordered”); Duluth Herald & News Tribune v. 7 Plymouth Optical Co., (noting lack of a transcript precludes review of factual questions); -65 (Minn. 1944) (stating that “on appeal error is never presumed.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
- A25-1656 Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Craig Seitzer.
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Plymouth Optical Co., (noting lack of a transcript precludes review of factual questions); -65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. M. D., C. J. M. and T. …
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
ychotherapy, parenting/psychological evaluations, psychiatric services and individual therapy, medication management, parenting education, domestic -violence programming, and (“When there is an evidentiary hearing, we are not able to review a party’s argument that the other party did not prove its claims if no transcript is ordered.”); -65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
- In Re the Custody of: A. A. S., Karryn Colleen Schwab v. Ryan George Schenck, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-
In Re the Custody of: A. A. S., Karryn Colleen Schwab v. Ryan George Schenck, ...
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
It must be made to appear affirmatively before there can be reversal.” -65 (Minn. 1944).
-
Donald D. Kern, Relator,
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- 65 (Minn. 1944) (stating that error is not presumed on appeal and the aggrieved party bears the burden of demonstrating error).
- In re the Marriage of: Joseph Ming Klimmek v. Elizabeth Lynn Klimmek Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-
In re the Marriage of: Joseph Ming Klimmek v. Elizabeth Lynn Klimmek
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
-
In the Matter of the Appeal by Souriyathay Adult Daycare Order of License Revocation License No.: 1108140 (Adult …
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
[and] the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.” -65 (Minn. 1944); (applying Waters in the administrative-law context), rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
-
Timothy S. Christenson, et al., Respondents,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See Bartylla, d at 22 (holding that such assertions are waived); -65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
- In the Matter of the Arthur F. Symens Revocable Trust created September 21, 2016 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-
In the Matter of the Arthur F. Symens Revocable Trust created September 21, 2016
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-65 (Minn. 1944) (stating that the appellant bears the burden of affirmatively establishing errors that occurred below).
-
Emmanuel Troy Davis, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
[and] the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies on it.” -65 (Minn. 1944).
- John August Krueger, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-
Craig Stevenson, et al., Appellants,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-65 (Minn. 1944) (noting that appellants bear “the burden of showing error” and such “error is never presumed”).
-
Valerie Steiner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
[and] the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.” -65 (Minn. 1944); (quoting Waters, d at 464).
-
Antonio Ray Seals, Jr., a minor child by his Mother and Natural Guardian Marciana Davis, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(stating that appellate courts generally address only those questions previously presented to and considered by the district court); (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.”).
-
In the Marriage of:
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- 65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
-
Dale Zubke, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., ().
-
In re the Marriage of:
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
–65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
-
Application for a Sulfate Site-Specific Standard for Hay Lake (AUID 31-0037-00), located downstream of the U.S. Steel - …
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
- Angeline R. Brozovich and Frank V. Brozovich, Relators, vs. Commissioner of Revenue, Respondent Minn. 2025
-
Angeline R. Brozovich and Frank V. Brozovich, Relators, vs. Commissioner of Revenue, Respondent
Minn. 2025
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., (–65 (Minn. 1944)).
-
Mark Weber, et al., Respondents,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
-
In re the Matter of the Application of Mekonnen Tulu and Tadelech N. Guda to Register the Title …
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
The district court found that respondent testified credibly that Preuss did not use or park his car on the disputed portion of the driveway, Sefkow, d at 210 (noting that this court defers to the district court’s credibility determinations), and appellants offer no evidence to contradict that finding, -65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
- Godfrey Muturi Simba v. Jacqueline Wangeshi Nwachukwu Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
Godfrey Muturi Simba v. Jacqueline Wangeshi Nwachukwu
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
2 -65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
-
Kelly Michels, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
-
Justin Bolton, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-65 (Minn. 1944) (holding that appellant has the “the burden of showing error”).
-
Paul Hansmeier, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See Collins, d at 146 (affirming district court’s imposition of sanctions in part because appellant did not provide transcripts and therefore did not provide this court with a sufficient record to conclude the district court abused its discretion); -65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
-
Northtown Mall Territories LLC, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Further, we do not presume error on appeal, and Northtown has pointed to nothing in the record to show that the district court relied upon the affidavit when issuing its decision.
-
Jennifer A. Hindermann, as executrix of the Estate of David K. Hindermann and as beneficiary of the Revocable …
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See Waters v. Fiebelkorn , - 65 (Minn. 1944) ( “[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
-
In re the Marriage of:
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
[and] the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.” -65 (Minn. 1944).
-
Tesfaye Shikur, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
-
August Ventures, LLC a Minnesota limited liability company, et al., Respondents,
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See Waters v. Fiebelkorn , - 65 (Minn. 1944) ( noting that an error “must be made to appear affirmatively before there can be reversal”).
- In the Matter of: Tammy Alberts v. Joseph Alberts Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- In the Matter of: Danielle Ann Oldenburg v. Daniel Frederick Schanze, (A23-1837), ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
In the Matter of: Tammy Alberts v. Joseph Alberts
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
-
In the Matter of: Danielle Ann Oldenburg v. Daniel Frederick Schanze, (A23-1837), ...
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- 65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
- In re the Custody of A.W.W: Nicholas Taylor Wehrwein v. Patricia Katrine Hascall Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
In re the Custody of A.W.W: Nicholas Taylor Wehrwein v. Patricia Katrine Hascall
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
d 461, 464-65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
- In re the Marriage of: Robert Thomas Nord, A v. Katherine Elizabeth Bowers, B, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- Les Grumdahl Window & Siding LLC, A Minnesota Limited Liability Company v. Holly Brown, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
In re the Marriage of: Robert Thomas Nord, A v. Katherine Elizabeth Bowers, B, ...
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
-
Les Grumdahl Window & Siding LLC, A Minnesota Limited Liability Company v. Holly Brown, ...
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.