Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Waters v. Fiebelkorn, 13 N.W.2d 461.

188 citing documents.

Metropolitan Transportation Network, Inc. v. Collaborative Student Transportation of Minnesota, ... 6 N.W.3d 771 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Metropolitan Transportation Network, Inc. v. Collaborative Student Transportation of Minnesota, ... 6 N.W.3d 771 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
Ronald Lindsey Reed v. Minnesota Department of Corrections Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Ronald Lindsey Reed v. Minnesota Department of Corrections Minn. Ct. App. 2024
[and] the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.” -65 (Minn. 1944).
In re the Marriage of: Bette Lou Gubbe Slag, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
Elfi E Janssen v. Lommen, Abdo, Cole, King & Stageberg P. A., Sibley ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Elfi E Janssen v. Lommen, Abdo, Cole, King & Stageberg P. A., Sibley ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n 6 appeal error is never presumed.
Christine A. Koch, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-65 (Minn. 1944) (stating that error is not presumed on appeal and appellant bears the burden of showing error on appeal).
In the Matter of: Ester Berestov, on behalf of minor children v. Betsalel Berestov, Appellant.... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of: Ester Berestov, on behalf of minor children v. Betsalel Berestov, Appellant.... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
d 461, 464-65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
In the Matter of the Assisted Living Contract Termination of D.W., Petitioner, by Graceful Lodge Home Care, Respondent. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-65 ( Minn. 1944) (stating that error is not presumed on appeal and the appellant has the burden of showing error).
Charles Aldean v. City of Woodbury Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Charles Aldean v. City of Woodbury Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(“[E]rror without prejudice is not ground for reversal.”).
Kallys Albert, Sr. v. Chon Xiong, Jared J. Timmer (Progressive Claims Generalist), ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Kallys Albert, Sr. v. Chon Xiong, Jared J. Timmer (Progressive Claims Generalist), ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
[and] the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.” -65 (Minn. 1944).
In the Matter of the Leonard E. Erlandson and Marion L. Erlandson Irrevocable Trust Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Leonard E. Erlandson and Marion L. Erlandson Irrevocable Trust Minn. Ct. App. 2024
As such, appellant cannot meet his burden to show that the district court erred in interpreting the term “proceeds.” -65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
State of Minnesota v. Carmen Marie Burth Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Carmen Marie Burth Minn. Ct. App. 2023
3 (requiring deference to district court’s “exercise of discretion in evidentiary matters” (quotation omitted)); (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.”).
Spring Grove Township, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- 65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed .
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2023
[, and] the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.” -65 (Minn. 1944).
Patrice V. Nerad, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
It is well established that “the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.” Waters v. Fiebelkorn , d 461, 465 (Minn. 1944).
In re: Guardianship of Jill Lee Osufsen Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re: Guardianship of Jill Lee Osufsen Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-65 (Minn. 1944) (stating that error is not presumed on appeal and the appellant has the burden of showing error on appeal).
James M. Carlson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“[O]n appeal error is never presumed,” and “the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.” -65 (Minn. 1944).
In the Matter of the Welfare of: Z. A. W., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
d 461, 464-65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
A23-0563 Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
In re: the Lawrence B. Schwagerl Trust Under Agreement Dated April 9, 1999; Minn. Ct. App. 2023
480, 480 (Minn. 1997) (noting that appellate courts decline to reach issues that are inadequately briefed); (applying Wintz in a trust-related dispute); d 92, 98 (Minn. 1987) (“Although error may exist, unless the error is prejudicial, no grounds exist for reversal”); Waters v. Fiebelkorn , - 65 (1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
aff’d, -65 (Minn. 1944).
Rebecca Lynn Fideldy, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
John Robinson, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Charles Matthew Waters, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
oepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., (“An assignment of error based on mere assertion and not supported by any argument or authorities in appellant’s brief is waived and will not be considered on appeal unless prejudicial error is obvious on mere inspection”); Braend, d at 929 (applying Schoepke in an OFP appeal); -65 (Minn. 1944) (stating that “on appeal error is never presumed.
Todd Brian Kerber, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed issue); -65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
In re the Matter of: John Erik Ensrud, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- 65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O] n appeal error is never presumed.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Roger Dean Olson, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-65 (Minn. 1944) ( “[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
Fitness International, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- 65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
Jacob Robuck, et al., Relators, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Roy Vincent Aguirre. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Marthamae Kottschade, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
[and] the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.” -65 (Minn. 1944); (discussing Waters); (applying Loth).
In re the Custody of K.S. A. and G. M. A., Catherine Easter, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
d 461, 465 (Minn. 1944) (“[E]rror without prejudice is not ground for rever sal.”).
In re the Custody of: O.R.K., Jeremy Peter Kubesh, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address issue not adequately briefed); -65 (Minn. 1994) (“[O]n 13 appeal error is never presumed.
Allen Pyron, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
Hodan Dualeh, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
Landform Professional Services, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Waters v. Fiebelkorn , -65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
In re the Marriage of: Matthew James Beland, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
d 461, 464-65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
In re the Matter of: Matthew Chandler Minn. Ct. App. 2022
- 65 (Minn. 1974) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
In re the Marriage of: Elizabeth Ann Jones Chidothe, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
24, 2001); - 65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
In re the Custody of: S. D. C. and Z. R. C., Kris Marie Hell, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
[and] the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.” Waters v. Fiebelkorn , d 461, 464-65 (Minn. 1974).
Joseph Eilefson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
- 65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.