Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Waters v. Fiebelkorn, 13 N.W.2d 461.

188 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
[and] the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.” -65 (Minn. 1944).
In re the Marriage of: Heather Elizabeth Wray-Isquierdo, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
[and] the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.” -65 (Minn. 1944)
In re the Marriage of: Melissa Ann Kuchera, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
[and] the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.” - 65 (Minn. 1944)
In the Matter of Brita Johanna Springstead, on behalf of minor child, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, (declining to reach issue not adequately briefed); d 461, 464- 65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
In re the Marriage of: Holly Joy Klick, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
13 see also Waters v. Fiebelkorn , -65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
Kenneth Kuller, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
1997) (declining to address issue not adequately briefed); (“[T]he burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.”).
Sharon Powers-Potter, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Wintz Parcel Drivers, d at 480; -65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
Peter Gerard Lonergan, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
–65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
Rebecca Sue Nash, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-65 (Minn. 1944) (stating that “on appeal error is never presumed” and “[t]he burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.”) .
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: T. L. S. and J. J. C., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Waters v. Fiebelkorn , -65 (Minn. 1944) (stating that appellant bears burden of showing error on appeal); (ignoring an error as harmless in a voluntary termination of parental rights proceeding); (Minn.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
E.g., State v. Bursch , (“Arguments are forfeited if they are presen ted in a summary and conclusory form, do not cite to applicable law, and fail to analyze the law when claiming that errors of law occurred.”); see also Waters v. Fiebelkorn , -65 (Minn. 1974) (“[O]n appeal error is neve r presumed.
In re the Supervised Estate of: Delbert W Waara, Deceased. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
d 461, 464-65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal erro r is never presumed.
Jay A. Soeffker, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address issue not adequately briefed); d 461, 464-65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal erro r is never presumed.
In re the Marriage of: Samuel H. Boimah, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See Duluth Herald & News Tribune v. Plymouth Optical C o., (noting lack of a transcript precludes review of factual questions); -65 (Minn. 1944) (stating that “on appeal error is never presumed.
Peter Gerard Lonergan, and on behalf of all citizens civilly committed under the MCTA, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Waters v. Fiebelkorn , -65 (Minn. 1944).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.” -65 (Minn. 1944); (applying this concept in a family-law appeal), review 7 denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. H.-N. and L. V., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(stating that “[a]n evidentiary error i s not prejudicial if the record contains other evidence that is sufficient to support the findings ”); see also Waters v. Fiebelkorn , (noting, generally, that “error without prejudice is not ground for reversal.”).
Jodi D. Campbell, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See Waters v. Fiebelkorn , -65 (Minn. 1944); see also Luthen v. Luthen
State of Minnesota, ex rel. Gumdel Nygare Gilo, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
v. Midway Ct r., Inc., ( -65 (Minn. 1944).
In the Matter of: Gohar Yesayan, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
v. Midway Ctr., Inc. , (stating that, to obtain relief on appeal, an a ppellant must show both error and prejudice resulting from that error); Waters v. Fiebelkorn , -65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never pr esumed.
Michael Nassif, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (concluding that appellate courts decline to reach issues that are inadequately briefed); - 65 ( Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See Waters v. Fiebelkorn , (stating that error is never presumed on appeal).
Maine Heights LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address issue not adequately briefed); 4-65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
A20-0072 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address issue not adequately briefed ); (declining to address issue not adequately briefed ); 4-65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Waters v. Fiebelkorn , -65 (Minn. 1944).
In re the Marriage of: Dia Eldin Jubara, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc. , (declining to address issue not adequately briefed); -65 (Minn. 1944) (“On appeal error is never presumed.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
[and] the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it” (quoting Waters v. Fiebelkorn , -65 (1944)); (applying this aspect of Loth).
In re: Request for Records by Amina Mohamed. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Roger D. Anderson, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Waters v. Fiebelkorn , -65 (Minn. 1944).
In re the Marriage of: Esther Jayasheela Potti, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
It must be made to appear affirmatively before there can be reversal;” and “the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.” -65 (Minn. 1944).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
John Koppi, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
McKenzie v. State , d 744, 746 n.1 (Minn. 1998) (stating that arguments inadequately briefed are waived where the appellant alludes to issues but “fails to address them in the argument portion of his brief”); -65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. F., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
The Replacement Fosters bear the burden of demonstrating error on appeal, –65 (Minn. 1944), and we do not reach issues that are not 18 adequately briefed.
In re the Matter of: Susan Kelly Lynn, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
[and] the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.” Waters v. Fiebelkorn , –65 ( Minn. 1944); (stating that generally, a court will not modify ordinary rules and procedures because a pro se party lacks the skills and knowledge of an attorney).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
[and] the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.” Waters v. Fiebelkorn, 216 Minn. 489, 495, -65 (1944).
A19-1585 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
-65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
Samuel Zean, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A19-0006 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is nev er presumed.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
[and] the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.” –65 (Minn. 1944).
In re the Marriage of: John Richard Strosahl, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
” Waters v. Fiebelkorn , 65 (Minn. 1944).
In re the Matter of: James Steinbach, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(“[T]he burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.”).
Nicollet Plaza, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
Clarence Johnson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-65 (Minn. 1 9 4 4 ) ( “ [ O ] n a p p e a l e r r o r i s n e v e r p r e s u m e d .
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2019
[and] the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.” -65 (Minn. 1944).
Gabrielle Marie Geraci, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Accordingly, appellant fails to show the district court improperly used the social-relationship evidence.1 -65 (Minn. 1944) (“It is well to bear in mind that on appeal error is never presumed.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Anthony Bruce Eberhardt Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(quoting Waters v. Fiebelkorn , -65 ( Minn. 1944)).
McKraut Holdings, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.