Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Anyanwu, 681 N.W.2d 411.

71 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Devin Lee Arola Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Devin Lee Arola Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“[A] direct appeal is appropriate when the record contains factual support for the defendant’s claim and when no disputes of material fact must be resolved to evaluate the 7 claim on the merits.” n.1 (Minn. App. 2004)
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State v. Anyanwu , & n.1 (Minn. App. 2004)
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
appeal directly to this court.” n.1 (Minn. App. 2004), overruled on other grounds by Wheeler v. State
Jetaun Helen Wheeler, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
and Anderson v. State, 746 N.W .2d 901, 905 (Minn. App. 2008).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
The trial court imposed a stayed sentence “[o]ver the defendant’s protest.” Id.; (direct appeal from a judgment of conviction); (direct appeal from a judgment of conviction).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
& n.1 (Minn. App. 2004) (holding that defendant could challenge guilty plea for first time on appeal when challenge was based on matters 9 of record and no material-fact dispute existed)
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See State v. Anyanwu , & n. 1 (Minn. App. 2004) (holding that defendant could challenge guilty plea for first time on appeal when challenge was based entirely on matters of record and no material -fact dispute exist ed), overruled by Wheeler v. State
Rufus Cornelius Loyd, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
The state filed a sentencing appeal in this court; thereafter, the state filed a motion in the district court, seeking to vacate Loyd’s -15 (Minn. App. 2004).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See State v. Anyanwu , , overruled on other grounds by Wheeler v. State, ___ N.W.2d ___, ___, 2018 WL 1414708, at *8 (Minn. Mar.
Wheeler v. State 909 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 2018
Wheeler v. State 909 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 2018
In recent years, the court of appeals has interpreted Johnson to instead mean that although a judge cannot "become excessively involved" in plea negotiations, State v. Anyanwu , , 414 (Minn. App. 2004) (emphasis added), some judicial involvement is "inevitable" and acceptable, Wheeler , d at 815 .
In the Matter of the Welfare of: C. G. H., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2018
& n.1 (Minn. App. 2004).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
4 State v. Anyanwu , n.1 (Minn. App. 2004) (-83 (Minn. 1989); State v. 4 It is conceivable on this record that appella nt did not understand the significance of the exchanges between counsel and the district c ourt, despite his stated agreemen
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Beaulieu argues that the district court stepped into the state’ s role because the sentencing hearing “was more-or-less a discussion between Beaulieu and the Judge.” But Anyanwu involved an allegation that a district court improperly injected itself in to plea negotiations when it promised
State v. Brown 896 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Brown 896 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-15 (Minn. App. 2004), in which we determined a plea was invalid despite it being accurate, voluntary, and intelligent because the district court impermissibly injected itself into the plea negotiations.
Jetaun Helen Wheeler v. State of Minnesota 889 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Jetaun Helen Wheeler v. State of Minnesota 889 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Clemente Ramirez-Diaz Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Clemente Ramirez-Diaz Minn. Ct. App. 2017
improperly inject itself into plea negotiations.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of: S.L.S., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of: S.L.S., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Lloyd Matthew McKenzie Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Lloyd Matthew McKenzie Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Yet “the case law is clear that a district court should not usurp the 4 responsibility of counsel or become excessively involved in plea negotiations and may not improperly inject itself into plea negotiations.” n.1 (Minn. 1977) (stating that “[t]rial judges should be very cautious not to impermissibly participate in plea negotiations”).
Jacquet Deon Munn v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jacquet Deon Munn v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(“Anytime a district court improperly injects itself into plea negotiations the guilty plea is per se invalid.”).
State of Minnesota v. Brittany Ann Vacko Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Brittany Ann Vacko Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(“[A] defendant has a right to challenge his guilty plea on direct appeal even though he has not moved to withdraw the guilty plea in the district court.”); (indicating that a defendant is not permitted to challenge guilty plea on dire
Ignacio Olalde-Hernandez v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Ignacio Olalde-Hernandez v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(“It is improper for a district court to promise a particular sentence in advance.”).
State of Minnesota v. Lorenzo Leontay Washington Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Lorenzo Leontay Washington Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-15 (Minn. App. 2004) (stating that a court should not inject itself into plea negotiations and step into the position of one of the parties to the negotiation).
State of Minnesota v. Michael Devon Jarmon Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Michael Devon Jarmon Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Anytime a district court improperly injects itself into plea negotiations the guilty plea is per se invalid.”
State of Minnesota v. Jonathan Andrew Bursch Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Joseph Knebel Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Joseph Knebel Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jonathan Andrew Bursch Minn. Ct. App. 2015
While a defendant cannot waive the right to appeal a sentence, he can forfeit the right to challenge fines and 12 fees imposed as part of a sentence by not objecting in the district court.
State of Minnesota v. Harry Maddox, III Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Harry Maddox, III Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“A defendant is free to simply appeal directly from a judgment of conviction and contend that the record made at the time the plea was entered is inadequate in one or more of these respects.” Id.; n.1 (Minn. App. 2004) (“[A] defendant who challenges a judgment of conviction against him based on an invalid guilty plea .
State of Minnesota v. Abdul Khalid Hakeem Malik El Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Abdul Khalid Hakeem Malik El Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Damien Lashaun Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Damien Lashaun Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
n.1 (Minn. App. 2004) (“[A] defendant who challenges a judgment of conviction against him based on an invalid guilty plea .
State of Minnesota v. Gerald Raymond Gustafson Minn. Ct. App. 2015