Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Schallinger v. Schallinger, 699 N.W.2d 15.

64 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Laura Marie Knutsen v. Peder Nels Knutsen Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(affirming denial of need-based fees when party paid fees in part with “advance marital fund distribution”), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Turning to mother’s second argument, when a district court adopts a proposed order verbatim, it is “not reversible error per se.” , rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(affirming denial of need-based fees when party paid fees in part with “advance marital fund distribution”), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In the Marriage of: Sarah Nicole Smith v. Jonathan George Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Marriage of: Sarah Nicole Smith v. Jonathan George Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Additionally, even when a district court adopts proposed findings verbatim, it is “not reversible error per se” but “raises the question of whether the court independently evaluated the evidence.” rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
8 amount of an obligor’s income for purposes of child support is a finding of fact and will not be altered on appeal unless clearly erroneous.” d 15, 23 (Minn. App. 2005), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Pikula, d at 710; rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Dhimble Ali v. Fahria Mohamed Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Dhimble Ali v. Fahria Mohamed Minn. Ct. App. 2024
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re: Guardianship of Jill Lee Osufsen Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re: Guardianship of Jill Lee Osufsen Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A reviewing court examines the findings to determine whether they are clearly erroneous.” (citations omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Matter of: Bamidele Adetifa, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
Suzanne Stephens, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Rebecca Ellen Bender, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Tabitha Ann Sanborn, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Schallinger v. Schallinger , rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Amanda Leigh Davis Floyd, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Erica Hopper McMullen, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
S. A., petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Conduct-based attorney- fee awards “are discretionary with the district court.” d 285, 295 (Minn. App. 2007); (“An award of attorney fees .
In re the Marriage of: Jeffrey Scott Jovaag, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
d 15, 24 (Minn. App. 2005).
In re the Marriage of: John Alex Walker, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Matthew James Beland, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“A determination of the amount of an obligor’ s inc ome for purposes of child support is a 9 finding of fact and will not be altered on ap peal unless clearly erroneous.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Kevin James Stanton, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Schallinger v. Schallinger , review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Kimberly JoAnn Wauzynski, n/k/a/ Kimberly JoAnn Denne, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Charles Robert Aufenthie, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Custody of E. J. B., Minn. Ct. App. 2020
We will affirm a district court’s findings on income for the purposes of child support if the findings rest 5 on “a reasonable basis in fact and are not clearly erroneous.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Suzanne Lea Pham, nka Suzanne Lea Filippi, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
1 “rests almost entirely within the discretion of the [district] court and will not be disturbed absent a clear abuse of discretion.” d 15, 24 (Minn. App. 2005) (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Mary Elizabeth Moline, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
An award of attorney fees under section 518.14, subdivision 1 “rests almost entirely with in the discretion of the [district] court and will not be disturbed absent a clear abuse of discretion.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
A. S. v. K. C.-W. (In re C. F. N.) 923 N.W.2d 325 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A. S. v. K. C.-W. (In re C. F. N.) 923 N.W.2d 325 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Pikula , d at 710 ; Schallinger v. Schallinger , , 19 (Minn. App. 2005), review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Matter of: Matthew Lawson Thornton, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Pikula, d at 710; Schallinger v. Schallinger , review denied (Minn. Sept.
A17-1687 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Custody of: J. K. L. Peter Romero Lockhart, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Schallinger v. Schallinger , (citations omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
James Cortese, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
7 review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Mary Ann Fenlon, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Marianne Ronate Reis v. Thomas Michael Hallberg Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Marianne Ronate Reis v. Thomas Michael Hallberg Minn. Ct. App. 2016
1 (2014); review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: James Walter Shaw v. Barbara Ann Shaw Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: James Walter Shaw v. Barbara Ann Shaw Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“There is neither a statutory presumption disfavoring joint physical custody, nor is there a preference against joint physical custody if the district court finds that it is in the best interest of the child and the four joint custody factors support such a determination.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
City of Apple Valley v. William C. Thompson (deceased), Below, Gene Rechtzigel, individually and as trustee of Evelyn … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
City of Apple Valley v. William C. Thompson (deceased), Below, Gene Rechtzigel, individually and as trustee of Evelyn … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In any event, “[a] district court’s verbatim adoption of a party’s proposed findings and conclusions of law is not reversible error per se.” (citations omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Jennifer Lee Hedberg v. Benjamin Carl Hedberg, County of Chisago, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Jennifer Lee Hedberg v. Benjamin Carl Hedberg, County of Chisago, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Sharon Alice Gribble v. William Daniel Gribble Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Sharon Alice Gribble v. William Daniel Gribble Minn. Ct. App. 2015
12, 1993), such adoption of findings does not alter our clear-error 10 standard of review or compel reversal in itself, d 15, 23 (Minn. App. 2005), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Jerrod Matthew Brown v. Amanda Marie Spoden, n/k/a Amanda Vinkemeier Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jerrod Matthew Brown v. Amanda Marie Spoden, n/k/a Amanda Vinkemeier Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The resolution of a motion for attorney fees under this section “rests almost entirely within the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed absent a clear abuse of discretion.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Michael Charles Sasse, f/k/a Michael Charles Sasse Penkert v. Kathryn Elizabeth Penkert, f/k/a Delight Bernice Penkert Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Michael Charles Sasse, f/k/a Michael Charles Sasse Penkert v. Kathryn Elizabeth Penkert, f/k/a Delight Bernice Penkert Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“A determination of the amount of an obligor’s income for purposes of child support is a finding of fact and will not be altered on appeal unless clearly erroneous.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Kathryn R. Rauworth, n/k/a Kathryn R. Kendall v. Barry L. Rauworth Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Kathryn R. Rauworth, n/k/a Kathryn R. Kendall v. Barry L. Rauworth Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“An award of attorney fees under [section 518.14] rests almost entirely within the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed absent a clear abuse of discretion.” (quotation omitted).