Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Schallinger v. Schallinger, 699 N.W.2d 15.

67 citing documents.

In Re the Custody of the Children of: Matthew Prescott Beale v. Sara Elizabeth Aase Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“A district court’s verbatim adoption of a party’s proposed findings and conclusions of law is not reversible error per se” and is “generally an accepted practice,” though “it raises the question of whether the court independently evaluated the evidence.” rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Marianne Michele Thayer v. Larry Frank Thayer Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(determining that the district court evaluated the evidence independently “[b]ased on a review of the record and the district court’s extensive findings of fact and conclusions of law) , rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Julie Karen Johnson v. Thomas Francis Johnson, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(affirming denial of need-based fees when party paid fees in part with “advance marital fund distribution”), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Laura Marie Knutsen v. Peder Nels Knutsen Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(affirming denial of need-based fees when party paid fees in part with “advance marital fund distribution”), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the marriage of: Erica Faith Haines v. Joshua Isaac Haines Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Turning to mother’s second argument, when a district court adopts a proposed order verbatim, it is “not reversible error per se.” , rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Diana Jakubauskiene v. Robertas Jakubauskas Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(affirming denial of need-based fees when party paid fees in part with “advance marital fund distribution”), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In the Marriage of: Sarah Nicole Smith v. Jonathan George Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Marriage of: Sarah Nicole Smith v. Jonathan George Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Additionally, even when a district court adopts proposed findings verbatim, it is “not reversible error per se” but “raises the question of whether the court independently evaluated the evidence.” rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Jessica Suzanne Cross v. Joseph Drew Cross Minn. Ct. App. 2024
8 amount of an obligor’s income for purposes of child support is a finding of fact and will not be altered on appeal unless clearly erroneous.” d 15, 23 (Minn. App. 2005), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Stacy Ann Bednar v. Craig Richard Bednar Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Pikula, d at 710; rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Dhimble Ali v. Fahria Mohamed Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Dhimble Ali v. Fahria Mohamed Minn. Ct. App. 2024
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re: Guardianship of Jill Lee Osufsen Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re: Guardianship of Jill Lee Osufsen Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A reviewing court examines the findings to determine whether they are clearly erroneous.” (citations omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Matter of: Bamidele Adetifa v. Nehplainseh Pay-Bayee Minn. Ct. App. 2023
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
Suzanne Stephens v. Jon Goodwin as Trustee of the Cleone J. Goodwin Revocable Trust Agreement dated July 17, … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Rebecca Ellen Bender v. Peter Howard Bernhard Minn. Ct. App. 2023
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Tabitha Ann Sanborn v. Matthew Charles Sanborn Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Schallinger v. Schallinger , rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Amanda Leigh Davis Floyd v. Michael Scott Floyd Minn. Ct. App. 2023
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Erica Hopper McMullen v. James Jason McMullen Minn. Ct. App. 2023
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
S. A., petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Conduct-based attorney- fee awards “are discretionary with the district court.” d 285, 295 (Minn. App. 2007); (“An award of attorney fees .
In re the Marriage of: Jeffrey Scott Jovaag v. Melissa Jo Helene Jovaag Minn. Ct. App. 2021
d 15, 24 (Minn. App. 2005).
In re the Marriage of: John Alex Walker v. Laura Margaret Walker Minn. Ct. App. 2021
review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Matthew James Beland v. Heidi Ann Beland, Polk County, Intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“A determination of the amount of an obligor’ s inc ome for purposes of child support is a 9 finding of fact and will not be altered on ap peal unless clearly erroneous.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Kevin James Stanton v. Megan Caroline Curran Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Schallinger v. Schallinger , review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Kimberly JoAnn Wauzynski, n/k/a/ Kimberly JoAnn Denne v. John Justin Wauzynski Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Charles Robert Aufenthie v. Heidi Christine Aufenthie Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Custody of E. J. B., Israel J. Perry v. Rachel J. Beukema Minn. Ct. App. 2020
We will affirm a district court’s findings on income for the purposes of child support if the findings rest 5 on “a reasonable basis in fact and are not clearly erroneous.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Suzanne Lea Pham, nka Suzanne Lea Filippi v. Cuong V. Pham Minn. Ct. App. 2019
1 “rests almost entirely within the discretion of the [district] court and will not be disturbed absent a clear abuse of discretion.” d 15, 24 (Minn. App. 2005) (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Mary Elizabeth Moline v. Daniel Robert Moline Minn. Ct. App. 2019
An award of attorney fees under section 518.14, subdivision 1 “rests almost entirely with in the discretion of the [district] court and will not be disturbed absent a clear abuse of discretion.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
A. S. v. K. C.-W. (In re C. F. N.) 923 N.W.2d 325 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A. S. v. K. C.-W. (In re C. F. N.) 923 N.W.2d 325 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Pikula , d at 710 ; Schallinger v. Schallinger , , 19 (Minn. App. 2005), review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Matter of: Matthew Lawson Thornton v. Jessica Ortiz Bosquez Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Pikula, d at 710; Schallinger v. Schallinger , review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Grace Kathryn Adams v. Frank Thomas Adams Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Custody of: J. K. L. Peter Romero Lockhart v. Quintiny Luenelle Flakes Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Schallinger v. Schallinger , (citations omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
James Cortese, et al v. Jay D. Hedin, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2018
7 review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Mary Ann Fenlon v. Steven Robert Fenlon Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Marianne Ronate Reis v. Thomas Michael Hallberg Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Marianne Ronate Reis v. Thomas Michael Hallberg Minn. Ct. App. 2016
1 (2014); review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: James Walter Shaw v. Barbara Ann Shaw Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: James Walter Shaw v. Barbara Ann Shaw Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“There is neither a statutory presumption disfavoring joint physical custody, nor is there a preference against joint physical custody if the district court finds that it is in the best interest of the child and the four joint custody factors support such a determination.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
City of Apple Valley v. William C. Thompson (deceased), et al. Below, Gene Rechtzigel, individually and as trustee … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
City of Apple Valley v. William C. Thompson (deceased), et al. Below, Gene Rechtzigel, individually and as trustee … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In any event, “[a] district court’s verbatim adoption of a party’s proposed findings and conclusions of law is not reversible error per se.” (citations omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Jennifer Lee Hedberg v. Benjamin Carl Hedberg, County of Chisago, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Jennifer Lee Hedberg v. Benjamin Carl Hedberg, County of Chisago, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Sharon Alice Gribble v. William Daniel Gribble Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Sharon Alice Gribble v. William Daniel Gribble Minn. Ct. App. 2015
12, 1993), such adoption of findings does not alter our clear-error 10 standard of review or compel reversal in itself, d 15, 23 (Minn. App. 2005), review denied (Minn. Sept.
A14-1257 A14-1445 Jerrod Matthew Brown v. Amanda Marie Spoden, n/k/a Amanda Vinkemeier Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A14-1257 A14-1445 Jerrod Matthew Brown v. Amanda Marie Spoden, n/k/a Amanda Vinkemeier Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The resolution of a motion for attorney fees under this section “rests almost entirely within the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed absent a clear abuse of discretion.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Michael Charles Sasse, f/k/a Michael Charles Sasse Penkert v. Kathryn Elizabeth Penkert, f/k/a Delight Bernice Penkert Minn. Ct. App. 2015