Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Raleigh, 778 N.W.2d 90.
- State of Minnesota v. Quinten Devon Watkins Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota v. Quinten Devon Watkins Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- Michael Edmund Richmond, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-
Michael Edmund Richmond, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
To be constitutionally valid, a guilty plea must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.” (citation omitted).
- State of Minnesota v. Larry Tabell Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- Kayd Mohamed Falug v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota v. Gary Wayne Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota v. Gary Wayne Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- Joel Armen Underwood, III v. State of Minnesota Minn. 2025
- Joel Armen Underwood, III v. State of Minnesota Minn. 2025
-
Reginald Scott Hubbard v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Although “[a] defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea,” a plea withdrawal must be allowed if “necessary to correct a ‘manifest injustice.’” (quoting Minn. R. Crim.
- State of Minnesota v. Thomas Jay Shern Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-
State of Minnesota v. Nicolle Renee Berg
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.” .
-
State of Minnesota v. Steven Jeffrey Mueller
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A district court “must allow withdrawal of a guilty plea if withdrawal is necessary to correct a manifest injustice.” (quotation omitted); Minn. R. Crim.
- State of Minnesota v. Ashir Hassan Kimbrough Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- In the Matter of the Welfare of: T. J. D., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-
State of Minnesota v. Shawn Henry Wellner
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“The fair and just standard requires district courts to give due consideration to two factors: (1) the reasons a defendant advances to support withdrawal and (2) prejudice granting the motion would cause the state given its reliance on the plea.” State v. Raleigh , (quotations omitted).
- State of Minnesota v. Delmarcus Deante Joseph Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota v. Nicole Corrine Puckett Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota v. Boyd Jerome Morson, II Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota v. Mickela Joy Vredenburg Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-
State of Minnesota v. Brandon Matthew Mitchell
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
To be valid, “a guilty plea must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.”
- State of Minnesota v. Faron James Beaulieu Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-
Andrew Charles Patton v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
To be constitutionally valid, a guilty plea must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.” 4 (Minn. 2010) (citation omitted).
-
State of Minnesota v. Dylan Alexander Domino
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
To be “valid, a guilty plea must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.”
- State of Minnesota v. Matthew Michael Lewis Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Michael Lewis
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“To be constitutionally valid, a guilty plea must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.”
- State of Minnesota v. Dustin Joseph Kenda Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota v. Alfredo Torrez Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-
State of Minnesota v. Mykell Steffon Burton
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
DECISION “A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.”
- State of Minnesota v. Cass Howard Ellingboe Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota v. Cass Howard Ellingboe Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- Johnny Earl Edwards v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Henry Lee Brown, Appellant Minn. 2025
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Henry Lee Brown, Appellant Minn. 2025
- State of Minnesota v. Troy Allan Hill Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-
State of Minnesota v. Claude Michael McGriff
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“To be constitutionally valid, a guilty plea must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.”
-
State of Minnesota v. DaJohn Cortez Yarborough
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
The law does not afford a criminal defendant an “absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.”
-
Stacy Lee Row v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“To be constitutionally valid, a guilty plea must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.” (), rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
- State of Minnesota v. Hollis John Larson Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota v. Shawn Elson Randall Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- Germaine Yurii Butler v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-
State of Minnesota v. Thomas John Forcier
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.”
-
Daniel John Wyatt v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“A defendant bears the burden of showing [their] plea was invalid.”
- Connor Jerome Eischens v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Kemaludin Nuredin Mohammed Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Paul James Steichen Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Abdirashid Ahmed Hassan Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Abdirashid Ahmed Hassan
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.”
- Abdullahi Aden Ibrahim v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024