Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Welfare of the Children of A.I., 779 N.W.2d 886.

29 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Child(ren) of: D. L. S., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
of A.I., d 886, 892 (Minn. App. 2010).
A25-1089 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
d 886, 895 (Minn. App. 2010) (explaining that a district court does not abuse its discretion by ruling on a termination petition when reviewing the suitability of the proposed alternative placement would have delayed the proceedings), petition for rev. dismissed (Minn. Apr.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: G. U. T., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
1(b)(4) (providing that a person is palpably unfit to parent when they are “unable, for the reasonably foreseeable future, to care appropriately for the ongoing physical, mental, or emotional needs of the child”); (noting that it is well established that “[i]ncarceration alone does not necessarily preclude a person from acting in a parental role”), rev. dismissed (Minn. Apr.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. A. B. and A. D. C. V., … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
of A.I., 894 (Minn. App. 2010) (“Incarceration alone does not necessarily preclude a person from acting in a parental role.”).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: P. D. J., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
of A.I., (applying Thiele on appeal from a TPR).
In the Matter of the Children of: S. J. K. W., K. T. S., D. R. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. D. B. f/k/a A. D. H. (Mother) … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A. M. M. R., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
rev. dismissed (Minn. Apr.
A21-0950 Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. E. N. and B. C. K., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
9 matter before it.” (quotation omitted); (applying Thiele on appeal from a termination of parental rights).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: H.-M. E. R. and R. N. N., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(applying Thiele on appeal from a termination of parental rights).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A. L. C. and T. H. F., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
We review the district court’s factual conclusions for clear error, and its decision to transfer custody for an abuse of discretion, In re Welfare of Children of A.I., 8 review dismissed (Minn. Apr.
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. A. R.-A., Father. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
The petition also asserts that father’s “ frequent arrests will undoubtedly leave the infant abandoned somewhere with some unknown adult for an extended period of time.” Not only is this speculative, but “[i] ncarceration alone does not necessarily preclude a person from acting in a parental role.” , review dismissed (Minn. Apr.
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. A. V. and N. F. S., … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review dismissed (Minn. Apr.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. A. T. and R. N. V., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2018
d 886, 895 (Minn. App. 2010), review dismissed (Minn. Apr.
In the Matter of the Welfare of: C. C. S., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(“Jurisdiction in juvenile court matters is a question o f law, reviewed de novo.”), review dismissed (Minn. Apr.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. R. B. and D. T. R., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2018
But the statute nowhere excuses the county of making reasonable efforts in this situation, and it is well established that “[i]ncarceration alone does not necessarily preclude a person from acting in a parental role.” (citing cases).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. G.-A. and Unknown Father, Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review dismissed (Minn. Apr.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. S. and L. S., Jr., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. S. and L. S., Jr., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review dismissed (Minn. Apr.
A16-1012 A16-1014 In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: R. P., B. G., C. M. … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A16-1012 A16-1014 In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: R. P., B. G., C. M. … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review dismissed (Minn. Apr.
A16-1012 A16-1014 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review dismissed (Minn. Apr.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: D. S., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: D. S., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Appellant argues that the district court improperly relied on R.W., d at 49; and aff’d as modified (678 N.W.
In the Matter of the WELFARE OF C.J.H., Child 864 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the WELFARE OF C.J.H., Child 864 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(“Jurisdiction in juvenile court matters is a question of law, reviewed de novo.”), review dismissed (Minn. Apr.
In re the Welfare of the Children of K.S.F. 823 N.W.2d 656 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
In re the Welfare of the Children of K.S.F. 823 N.W.2d 656 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
11(d)(1)(i) (2010) (“[A]n order for transfer of permanent legal and physical custody to a relative shall only be made after the court has reviewed the suitability of the prospective legal and physical custodian....”); review dismissed (Minn. Apr.