Cited by

See Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC

If a rule does not define a word or phrase, we look to dictionary definitions to discover its “plain and ordinary meaning.” Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, (quotation omitted).

“Rule 4.03 mandates strict compliance with its terms.” Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC

(citing Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, (“When a statute or a rule does not contain a definition of a word or phrase, we look to the common dictionary definition of the word or phrase to discover its plain and ordinary meaning.” (quotation omitted)).

But “[w]hen a statute or a rule does not contain a definition of a word or phrase, we look to the common dictionary definition of the word or phrase to discover its plain and ordinary meaning.” Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, (quotation omitted); see also In re Reissuance of an NPDES/SDS Permit to United States Steel Corp., 6 (Minn. 2021) (recognizing that rules for statutory interpretation apply to interpretation of administrative rules); Minn. Stat. §§ 645.001 (2024) (providing that chapter

Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC

This is commonly referred to as “substitute service.” Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, 04-05 (Minn. 2016).

Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC

Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, Minn. Dep’t of Corr.

Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC

Although commonly referred to as substitute service, the “service upon an individual by leaving a copy at his usual place of abode with some person of suitable age and discretion residing therein—is a form of ‘personal’ service.” see also Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, -05 (Minn. 2016).

The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language 1234-35 (5th ed. 2018); see also Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, (explaining that an appellate court looks to the common dictionary definition of the word or phrase to discover its plain and ordinary meaning).

“Rule 4.03 mandates strict compliance with its terms.” Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC

Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC

“Whether service of process is effective pr esents a question of law that we review de novo.” Jaeger v. Palladi um Holdings, LLC

(referencing Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, Manco of Fairmont, Inc. v. Town Bd.

The common and ordinary meaning of “terminating” is “to bring to an end.” See Black’s Law Dictionary (11th ed. 2019) (defining terminate); see generally Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, (stating the court may look to a dictionary to ascertain the “plain and ordinary meaning” of a word or phrase not defined in a particular statute or rule).

Therefore, “we look to the common dictionary definition of the word or phrase to discover its plain and ordinary meaning.” Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).

Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, (noting that we may look to dictionary definition when term is otherwise undefined ).

In the absence of strict compliance with a statutory provision, there must still be a showing of at least “substantial compliance.” See, e.g., Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, (“We have .

Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC

1 (2020); Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, (“When a statute or a rule does not contain a definition of a word or phrase, we look to [dictionary definitions] ”).

See Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, d 601, 609 (Minn. 2016) .

at 1036 ; see Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC , d 601, 611 (Minn. 2016) (stating that “dictum” is a statement “unnecessary to the decision” of a case).

does not contain a definition of a word or phrase, we look to the common dictionary definition of the word or phrase to discover its plain and ordinary meaning.” Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, (quotation omitted); see also Minn. Stat. § 645.08(1) (2018) (providing that in construing statutes, words and phrases are to be given “their common and approved usage”).

Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC

Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, -11 (Minn. 2016).

(emphasis added)); see also Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC , , 605 (Minn. 2016) ("When a statute or a rule does not contain a definition of a word or phrase, we look to [dictionary definitions] ...."

pension of the obligor’s driver’s license, however, “the public authority must mail a written notice to the obligor at the obligor’s last known address, that it intends to seek suspension of the obligor’s dr iver’s license and that the obligor must request a hearing wi thin 30 days in order to conte st the suspension.” Minn. Stat. § 518A.65(c) (2018); cf. Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC , (“Procedural due process .

Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC

See Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC , , 610-11 (Minn. 2016).

See Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC , (“Of course, a ruling not necessary to the decision of a case can be regarded as only dictum.” ()).

according to rules of grammar and according to their common and approved usage"); Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC , , 605 (Minn. 2016).

" Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC , , 611 (Minn. 2016) (quoting State v. Rainer , 258 Minn. 168 , 179, , 396 (1960) ).

Cf. Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC , , 608 (Minn. 2016) ("These concepts, however similar they may sound, are not the same.").

“Procedural due process provi des a constitutional floor that requires any notice to be ‘reasonably calculated’ to ‘appraise interested parties of the pendency of the action’ before depriving them of life, liberty, or property.” (quoting Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 314, 70 S. Ct. 652 (1950)).

See Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC

The Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure authorize personal service by leaving “a copy at the individual’s usual place of abode with some person of suitable age and discretion then residing therein.” 6 Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, (emphasis added).