Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Steven J. Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, Franklin Financial, LLC, 884 N.W.2d 601.

54 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. J. G. Z Minn. Ct. App. 2026
at 532-33; see Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, d 601, 611 (Minn. 2016) (stating that “a ruling not necessary to the decision of a case can be regarded as only dictum” (quotation omitted)).
Frank R. Dropps v. Brunswick Township, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC
In the Marriage of: Sarah Nicole Smith v. Jonathan George Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Marriage of: Sarah Nicole Smith v. Jonathan George Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2026
If a rule does not define a word or phrase, we look to dictionary definitions to discover its “plain and ordinary meaning.” Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, (quotation omitted).
Constance M Johnson, et al v. Joseph Chris Hernandez, unknown tenants Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Rule 4.03 mandates strict compliance with its terms.” Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC
State of Minnesota v. Ryan Steven Masog Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(citing Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, (“When a statute or a rule does not contain a definition of a word or phrase, we look to the common dictionary definition of the word or phrase to discover its plain and ordinary meaning.” (quotation omitted)).
In the Matter of the Formal Complaint and Request for Relief by the Minnesota Solar Advocates Minn. Ct. App. 2025
But “[w]hen a statute or a rule does not contain a definition of a word or phrase, we look to the common dictionary definition of the word or phrase to discover its plain and ordinary meaning.” Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, (quotation omitted); see also In re Reissuance of an NPDES/SDS Permit to United States Steel Corp., 6 (Minn. 2021) (recognizing that rules for statutory interpretation apply to interpretation of administrative rules); Minn. Stat. §§ 645.001 (2024) (providing that chapter
Alpha News v. City of Detroit Lakes, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC
Ronald A. Hagle v. Gossett Properties LLC, et al., John Doe, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2025
This is commonly referred to as “substitute service.” Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, 04-05 (Minn. 2016).
Mark Lehnertz v. RAM Mutual Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC
In re the Matter of: Brian David Fleming v. Commissioner of Douglas County Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Matter of: Brian David Fleming v. Commissioner of Douglas County Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, Minn. Dep’t of Corr.
Stockholm Township v. Glenn A. Schmidt, et al., Bancommunity Service Corporation, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Stockholm Township v. Glenn A. Schmidt, et al., Bancommunity Service Corporation, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC
Charlene Karen Jundt v. Marcus Edward Jundt Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Although commonly referred to as substitute service, the “service upon an individual by leaving a copy at his usual place of abode with some person of suitable age and discretion residing therein—is a form of ‘personal’ service.” see also Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, -05 (Minn. 2016).
In the Matter of: Del Zotto Products Minn. Ct. App. 2023
The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language 1234-35 (5th ed. 2018); see also Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, (explaining that an appellate court looks to the common dictionary definition of the word or phrase to discover its plain and ordinary meaning).
Ronald A. Hagle v. Gossett Properties LLC, et al., John Doe, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Rule 4.03 mandates strict compliance with its terms.” Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC
City of Shorewood v. Guy Gerald Sanschagrin, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC
Lisa Thielen, et al v. Eden Valley Sportsman’s Club, Meeker County Zoning Administration Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Whether service of process is effective pr esents a question of law that we review de novo.” Jaeger v. Palladi um Holdings, LLC
Derrick D. Turner v. MG McGrath, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(referencing Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, Manco of Fairmont, Inc. v. Town Bd.
State of Minnesota, by its Attorney General Keith Ellison v. Howard W. Mostad Minn. Ct. App. 2022
The common and ordinary meaning of “terminating” is “to bring to an end.” See Black’s Law Dictionary (11th ed. 2019) (defining terminate); see generally Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, (stating the court may look to a dictionary to ascertain the “plain and ordinary meaning” of a word or phrase not defined in a particular statute or rule).
Charles Edward Honke v. Jennifer Hodapp Honke Minn. 2021
Therefore, “we look to the common dictionary definition of the word or phrase to discover its plain and ordinary meaning.” Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
State of Minnesota, ex rel. Gumdel Nygare Gilo v. Paul Schnell, Commissioner of Corrections Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, (noting that we may look to dictionary definition when term is otherwise undefined ).
In the Matter of: Diana Murack Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In the absence of strict compliance with a statutory provision, there must still be a showing of at least “substantial compliance.” See, e.g., Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, (“We have .
Jamison John Stewart v. John Doe, vs. Hoda Ahmed Sulub, Malko Ibrahim, et al., Third-Party Intervenors Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC
In the Matter of the Petition of Valet Living for a Declaration that Interpretation Titled Corridor Trash Collection … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
1 (2020); Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, (“When a statute or a rule does not contain a definition of a word or phrase, we look to [dictionary definitions] ”).
Megan Guetzkow, as mother and natural guardian of E.I., a minor, et al v. Brian John Irgens Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, d 601, 609 (Minn. 2016) .
In re the Marriage of: Samantha Magdalena Hansen v. Richard Bradley Hansen Minn. Ct. App. 2020
at 1036 ; see Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC , d 601, 611 (Minn. 2016) (stating that “dictum” is a statement “unnecessary to the decision” of a case).
Nancy Leppink, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry, et al v. Water Gremlin Company Minn. Ct. App. 2020
does not contain a definition of a word or phrase, we look to the common dictionary definition of the word or phrase to discover its plain and ordinary meaning.” Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, (quotation omitted); see also Minn. Stat. § 645.08(1) (2018) (providing that in construing statutes, words and phrases are to be given “their common and approved usage”).
Tammy Kirkpatrick, et al v. Meeker County Board of Commissioners Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC
Evan Andrew Lautigar v. $42,830.00 in U.S. Currency Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, -11 (Minn. 2016).
In re Restorff 932 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 2019
In re Restorff 932 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 2019
(emphasis added)); see also Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC , , 605 (Minn. 2016) ("When a statute or a rule does not contain a definition of a word or phrase, we look to [dictionary definitions] ...."
In re the Marriage of: Sandra Sue Grazzini-Rucki v. David Victor Rucki, County of Dakota, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2019
pension of the obligor’s driver’s license, however, “the public authority must mail a written notice to the obligor at the obligor’s last known address, that it intends to seek suspension of the obligor’s dr iver’s license and that the obligor must request a hearing wi thin 30 days in order to conte st the suspension.” Minn. Stat. § 518A.65(c) (2018); cf. Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC , (“Procedural due process .
Kelbro Company v. Vinny’s on the River, LLC, River Fun LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC
Abdel Elnashar v. Summit Orthopedics, Ltd., et al Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Janet M. Bauch, et al v. City of Pine Island Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Atwood 925 N.W.2d 626 Minn. 2019
State v. Atwood 925 N.W.2d 626 Minn. 2019
See Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC , , 610-11 (Minn. 2016).
James Aeshliman, et al v. Leonard Smisek, Jr., et al., Darren Wurm, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC , (“Of course, a ruling not necessary to the decision of a case can be regarded as only dictum.” ()).
Cruz-Guzman v. State 916 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2018
Associated Bank, N.A. v. Comm'r of Revenue 914 N.W.2d 394 Minn. 2018
Associated Bank, N.A. v. Comm'r of Revenue 914 N.W.2d 394 Minn. 2018
according to rules of grammar and according to their common and approved usage"); Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC , , 605 (Minn. 2016).
State v. Atwood 914 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Atwood 914 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
" Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC , , 611 (Minn. 2016) (quoting State v. Rainer , 258 Minn. 168 , 179, , 396 (1960) ).
Buskey v. Am. Legion Post 910 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 2018
Buskey v. Am. Legion Post 910 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 2018
Cf. Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC , , 608 (Minn. 2016) ("These concepts, however similar they may sound, are not the same.").
In re the Estate of: Randy Brian Sukut, Deceased Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Procedural due process provi des a constitutional floor that requires any notice to be ‘reasonably calculated’ to ‘appraise interested parties of the pendency of the action’ before depriving them of life, liberty, or property.” (quoting Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 314, 70 S. Ct. 652 (1950)).
State v. Thonesavanh 904 N.W.2d 432 Minn. 2017
State v. Thonesavanh 904 N.W.2d 432 Minn. 2017
See Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC