Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State of Minnesota v. Jacob Miles Solberg, 882 N.W.2d 618.

378 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
    “Consequently, departures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
    Therefore, “departures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
    Id.; (noting that sentencing guidelines seek to “maintain uniformity, proportionality, rationality, and predictability in sentencing of felony crimes”).
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
    5 and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
    “A dispositional departure places the offender in a different setting than that called for by the presumptive guidelines sentence.”
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
    As the state points out, “even if [Jackson] is trying to argue by analogy, the factors he cites are relevant only to dispositional departures.” “The Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines define two types of sentencing departures: dispositional and durational.”
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
    “A durational departure must be based on factors that reflect the seriousness of the offense, not the characteristics of the offender.”
  • State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
    “Because the [sentencing] guidelines’ goal is to create uniformity in sentencing, departures are justified only in exceptional cases.”
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
    But departures “are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”
  • State of Minnesota v. Matthew Michael Lewis Minn. Ct. App. 2025
  • State of Minnesota v. Matthew Michael Lewis Minn. Ct. App. 2025
    “Because the guidelines’ goal is to create uniformity in sentencing, departures are justified only in exceptional cases.”
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
    5; (“The Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines establish presumptive sentences for felony offenses.”).
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
    “A downward durational departure is justified only if the defendant’s conduct was significantly less serious than that typically involved in the commission of the offense.” (quotation omitted); see Minn. Sent’g Guidelines 2.D.3 (2022) (providing a “nonexclusive list of factors” that a district court may use to depart).
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
  • State of Minnesota v. Cass Howard Ellingboe Minn. Ct. App. 2025
  • State of Minnesota v. Cass Howard Ellingboe Minn. Ct. App. 2025
    “Consequently, departures from the 7 guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”
  • A24-0666 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
    “Because the guidelines’ goal is to create uniformity in sentencing, departures are justified only in exceptional cases.”
  • A24-0529 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
    3 The district court accepted Steffano’s pleas and informed Steffano of the maximum penalties for both 1 “[A] downward dispositional departure occurs when the presumptive guidelines sentence calls for imprisonment but the district court instead stays execution or imposition of the sentence.”
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
    “A district court abuses its discretion when its reasons for [denying a] departure are legally impermissible and insufficient evidence in the record justifies the [denial].”
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
    In a Norgaard plea, a defendant plead s guilty even though he or she is unable to remember the “facts of the offense because of intoxication or amnesia but is persuaded that he or she is likely to be convicted of the crime charged.” n.1 (Minn. 2016).
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
    “A dispositional departure typically focuses on characteristics of the defendant that show whether the defendant is particularly suitable for individualized treatment in a probationary setting.” (quotations omitted).
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
    “A downward durational departure is justified only if the defendant’s conduct was significantly less serious than that typically involved in the commission of the offense.” (quotation omitted); Minn. Sent’g Guidelines 2.D.3 (2022) (providing a “nonexclusive list of factors” that a district court may use to depart).
  • State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    “Consequently, departures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.” .
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    “A dispositional departure typically focuses on characteristics of the defendant that show whether the defendant is particularly suitable for individualized treatment in a probationary setting.” (quotation omitted).
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    Roach entered a Norgaard plea, which allows a defendant to plead guilty even though “he or she is unable to remember the specific facts of the offense because of intoxication or amnesia but is persuaded that he or she is likely to be convicted of the crime charged.” n.1 (Minn. 2016); see also State ex rel.
  • State of Minnesota v. Abdirashid Ahmed Hassan Minn. Ct. App. 2024
  • State of Minnesota v. Abdirashid Ahmed Hassan Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    “A dispositional departure typically focuses on characteristics of the defendant that show whether the defendant is particularly suitable for individualized treatment in a probationary setting.”
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    “Consequently, departures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”
  • State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    When the district court’s reasoning for a downward departure is improper or inadequate, we may examine the record to determine whether “alternative grounds support the departure.”
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    She is correct that “a dispositional departure typically focuses on characteristics of the defendant.” (emphasis added).
  • State of Minnesota v. Roel Joseph Perez, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
  • State of Minnesota v. TreVonne Cortez Green Minn. Ct. App. 2024
  • State of Minnesota v. TreVonne Cortez Green Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    Minn. Sent’g Guidelines 1.B.5.b (2022).
  • State of Minnesota v. Roel Joseph Perez, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    “[A] downward dispositional departure occurs when the presumptive guidelines sentence calls for imprisonment but the district court instead stays execution or imposition of the sentence.”
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    Durational Departure A downward durational departure is justified only if the defendant ’s conduct was “significantly less serious than that typically involved in the commission of the offense.” (quotation omitted) .
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    Hipp raised, and the district court correctly focused on, Hipp’s personal characteristics, because dispositional departures focus on whether the defendant’s characteristics make him “particularly suitable for individualized treatment in a probationary setting.” (quotation omitted).
  • State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    “We review a district court’s decision to depart from the presumptive guidelines sentence for an abuse of discretion.”
  • State of Minnesota v. Kevin Kris Christensen Minn. Ct. App. 2024
  • State of Minnesota v. Kevin Kris Christensen Minn. Ct. App. 2024
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    Appellate courts “review a district court’s decision to depart from the presumptive guidelines sentence for an abuse of discretion.”
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    “A downward durational departure is justified only if the defendant’s conduct was significantly less serious than that typically involved in the commission of the offense.” (quotation omitted).
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    ” Minn. Sent ’g Guidelines 1.B.13 (2022); .
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    “Because the guidelines’ goal is to create uniformity in sentencing, departures are justified only in exceptional cases.”
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    -35 (Minn. 2017); , 625-26 (Minn. 2016).
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    “A dispositional departure places the offender in a different setting than that called for by the presumptive guidelines sentence.”
  • A23-1716 A23-1717 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    “We review a district court’s decision to depart from the presumptive guidelines sentence for an abuse of discretion.”
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024