DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Montemayor v. Sebright Products, Inc., 898 N.W.2d 623.

268 citing documents.

  • In re the Trust of Donald Roy Scheid and June Vivian Scheid, Joint Revocable Trust. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
    Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc.
  • Merchant & Gould P.C., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
    Appellate courts review the grant of summa ry judgment de novo to determine “whether there are genuine issues of ma terial fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (quotation omitted).
  • Jenny Pachicano, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
    DECISION “We review the grant of summary judgment de novo to determine whether there are genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (quotation omitted).
  • In re the Estate of: Richard W. Koberoski, Deceased. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
    Summary judgment should not be granted when reasonable persons could draw different conclusions 6 from the evidence presented, Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc. , or when there are differing reasonable inferences from undisputed facts
  • Detailed by Design LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
    This court “ review[s] the grant of summary judgment de novo to determine whether there are genuine iss ues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (quotation omitted).
  • Kawaljit S. Bhatia, as Trustee for the next of kin of Ena M. Bhatia, deceased, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    Appellate courts “review the grant of summary judgment de novo to determine whether there are genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (quotation omitted).
  • Cole Clark, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc. , 8 (Minn. 2017).
  • Kevin Kopka, et al., individually and as parents and natural guardians of minor children B. Kopka and I. … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    Standard of Review On appeal from a grant of summary judgment, we apply a de novo standard of review “to determine whether there are genuine iss ues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (quotation omitted).
  • Bella Vista Condominium Association, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    Montemayor v. Sebright Prods, Inc.
  • Vicki Metcalf, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    Montemayor v. Sebright Prod s., Inc. , .
  • Minnesota Bank & Trust, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc.
  • Lacey C. Washington, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc.
  • Everest Stables, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    “We review the grant of summary judgment de novo to determine whether there are genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (quotation omitted).
  • Lighthouse Management Inc., Plaintiff, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    But at the summary-judgment stage, the district court must not “weigh facts or determine the credibility of affi davits and other evidence.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (quo tation omitted).
  • Whitefish Enterprises, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    We review a grant of summary judgment “de novo to determine whether there are genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (quotation omitted).
  • In the Matter of the Petition of Jane Serrano and Lynn Barbeau for certain relief relating to lands … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc.
  • Alerus Financial, N.A., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc.
  • A minor, by and through her mother and natural guardian, Amber Nelson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc.
  • Charlene Y. Latham, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc.
  • In the Matter of the Trust Agreement of Julian M. Johnson. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    “We review the grant of summ ary judgment de novo to determine whether there are genuine issues of ma terial fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (quotation omitted).
  • Minnesota Sporting Clays Association, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    DECISION We review a grant of summary judgment “de novo to determine whether there are genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (quotation omitted).
  • Docks of White Bear Lake, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    “We review the grant of su mmary judgment de novo to determine ‘whether there are genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.’” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc. , (quoting Stringer v. Minn. Vikings Football Club, LLC , ).
  • Jomari E. Alexander, Sr., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., d 623, 628 (Minn. 2017).
  • Paul Boyum, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    On appeal from a grant of summary judgment, w e apply a de novo standard of review “to determine ‘whether there are genuine issues of material fact and whethe r the district court erred in its application of the law.’” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc. , (quoting Stringer v. Minn. Vikings Football Club, LLC, ) .
  • Theresa M. Anderson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    See Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc.
  • Capacity Wireless, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    “We review the grant of summary judgment de novo to determine whether there are genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (quotation omitted).
  • Pharaoh El-Forever Left-i Amen El, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    Appellate courts “rev iew the grant of summary judgment de novo to determine whether there are genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (quotation omitted); see also Kenneh v. Homeward Bound, Inc.
  • Farmers Mill & Elevator, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    Montemayor v. Sebright Prod., Inc., Minn. R. Civ.
  • Paul Nelsen, Plaintiff, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc.
  • Nathan Mead, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    We review the grant of summary judgment de novo to determine “whether ther e are genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (quotation omitted).
  • Tunde Oni, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc.
  • William Hansen d/b/a W.G. Hansen & Associates, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc.
  • Travis Colsen, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    DECISION Appellate courts “review the grant of summary judgment de novo to determine whether there are genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (quotation omitted).
  • Wade S. Nukala, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    DECISION Appellate courts “review the grant of summary judgment de novo to determine whether there are genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (quotation omitted).
  • Devon T. Hogan, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc.
  • Ellen Kalahar-Grissom, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    See Montemayor v. Sebright Prod., Inc.
  • Bradley Hammond, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., see also Minn. R. Civ.
  • Steven Schussler, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc.
  • Daniel Ashbach, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc.
  • Charles Richard Stone, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    Appellate courts “review the grant of summary judgment de novo to determine ‘whether there are genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.’” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (quoting Stringer v. Minn. Vikings Football Club, LLC, ).
  • Knife River Corporation-North Central, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc.
  • Independent School District No. 477, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    We review the grant of summary judgment de novo to determine “whether there are genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of law.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (quotatio n 7 omitted).
  • Richard T. Jellinger, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    In reviewing the district court’s grant of summary judgment, we review de novo “whether there are any issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc.
  • Phillip Musselman, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    D E C I S I O N Minnesota appellate courts “ review the grant of summary judgment de novo to determine ‘whether there are genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.’” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (quoting Stringer v. Minn. Vikings Football Club, LLC, ); see Minn. R. Civ.
  • Ola Abdelaziz, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    Appellate courts “review the grant of 5 summary judgment de novo to determine whether there are genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc., (quotation omitted) .
  • William M. Dunkley, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc.
  • Samson Longtin, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    “We review the grant of summary judgment de novo to determine ‘whether there are genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.’” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc ., (quoting Stringer v. Minn. Vikings Football Club, LLC , ).
  • Carnea Roberson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    “We review the grant of summary judgment de novo to determine ‘whether there are genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.’” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc. , (quoting Stringer v. Minn. Vikings Football Club, LLC , ).
  • Minn. 2020
    P. 56.01, district courts are asked to determ ine whether a genuine dispute of material fact exists by evaluating whether “reasonable pers ons might draw different conclusions from the evidence presented.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prods., Inc. , (citations omitted) (internal q uotation marks omitted).
  • Bert Lawrence Pexsa, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    Summary judgment is “inappropriate when 5 reasonable per sons might draw different conclusions from the evidence presented.” Montemayor v. Sebright Prod., Inc. , (quotation omitted).