Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In re the Marriage of: Justin David Shearer v. Mandy Jane Shearer, 891 N.W.2d 72.

98 citing documents.

In the Matter of: Heidi Kay Wiplinger obo minor children v. Nicholas John Wiplinger Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“The district court has broad discretion in deciding parenting -time issues and will not be reversed absent an abuse of that discretion.” (quotation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Benjamin Thomas Miller v. Tanya Lynn Wright-Miller, NKA, Tanya Lynn Wright Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Custody of: C. W. P.; William James Peck v. Jodie Sue Simonette, and County of … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Determining the legal standard applicable to a change in parenting time is a question of law and is subject to de novo review.”
In re the Matter of: Josie Marie Martin v. Justin Michael Martin Minn. Ct. App. 2022
518A,” which deals with child support) (2020); -79 (Minn. App. 2017) (applying Minn. Stat. § 5 18A.36).
In re the Marriage of: Michelle Lynn Wilson, Ryan Converse Wilson, Co-Appellant v. Gayle Gaumer Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Tammy Sundbom Otterson v. Troy Otterson, and County of St. Louis, Intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Lisa Marie Winkowski v. J. Vincent Winkowski Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“The district court has broad discretion in determining parenting -time issues and will not be reversed absent an abuse of that discretion.” d 72, 75 (Minn. App. 2017) (quotation omitted).
County of Dakota, ex rel., Michelle Marie Hinz v. Bryan Arthur Rittweger Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Stacy Ann Rakow, f/k/a Przybilla v. Ryan Frank Przybilla Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“The district court has broad discretion in dete rmining parenting time issues and will not be reversed absent an abuse of that discretion.” Shearer v. Shearer , (quotation omitted).
In re the Custody of Derek Mausolf and Claire Mausolf, Nicholas Mausolf v. Ashley Heglund Minn. Ct. App. 2021
District courts have “broad discretion in determining parenting-time issues and will not be reversed absent an abuse of that discretion.” (quotation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Varvara Viktorovna Tishchenko v. Joseph Monroe Cmiel Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(custody); (parenting time).
In re the Marriage of: Andrew John Stevens v. Kyla Anne Stevens Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Tiffany Elizabeth Jean Banerjee v. Animesh Banerjee Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Trung Thien Do v. Kim Lang Thi Nguyen Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Alberta Okrah Danso v. Ransford Frimpong Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Daniel Raymond Jacobs v. Zdenka Irena Fenikova Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Richard Otto v. Janyce Otto Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Matter of: Brooks J. Waldron v. Uneica Nicole Garrett Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Although we review the decision to grant or deny parenting time modification motions for an abuse of discretion, determining what legal standard applies to a request to change parenting time is a question of law that we review de novo, ).
In re the Custody of: B. L. F., Cherries Chamberlain v. Neil Fleahman Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Kevin James Stanton v. Megan Caroline Curran Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“The district court has broad discretion in determining parenting-time issues and will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion.” (quotations omitted).
In re the Marriage of: James Patrick Pnewski v. Joan Susanne Pnewski Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: John Sterling Ross v. Tiiu Mikki Maide Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Myles John Sterling Mankus v. Melanie Marie Warren Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Custody of: N. Y. B., James Edward Bono v. Megan Yvonne Hedberg Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“The district court has broad discretion in determining parenting-time issues and will not be reversed absent an abuse of that discretion.” (quotation omitted).
In re the Paternity of: B. L. T., T. L. M v. C. G. B. T Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Julia Loxley Hynnek n/k/a Julia Loxley Kaemmer v. Eric Martin Hynnek Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Michaela Dojcinovic Bachmayer v. Kyle Dalke Bachmayer Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the matter of: Eric Thurman Clinton v. Gabriela Kathleen Linder Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“The district court has broad discretion in determining parenting -time issues and will not be reversed absent an abuse of that discretion.” (quoting Dahl v. Dahl , ).
In re the Marriage of: Tabatha Annette Cusick n/k/a Tabatha Annette Biegler v. Mark Anthony Cusick Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Custody of: R. T. R., C. T. R., and S. C. T. R., Robby Romero … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Paul Matthias Hobday v. Mary Kay Hobday Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Ngozi Egwim v. Agugua Ogini Egwim, Ramsey County Child Support Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: John Richard Strosahl v. Doreen Strosahl Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Robert William Bessenbacher v. Olga Sergeyevna Bessenbacher, County of Itasca, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Terrence Michael Zelenka v. Annie Valeria Anderson, f/k/a Anne Zelenka Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Katie Lynn Helsene v. Christopher Lee Helsene, and Crow Wing County, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Sandra Sue Grazzini-Rucki v. David Victor Rucki, County of Dakota, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(stating that, generally, appellate courts “review orders modifying child support for abus e of discretion”).
In re the Matter of: Bradley Joseph Patraw, and Ramsey County, intervenor v. Alicia Kay Wittmer Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Custody of: K. M. A. Daniel Cory Johnson v. Erica Rose-Lynne Arends Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Rachel Ann Hughes v. Brian Patrick Selmser Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Custody of: J. K. L. Peter Romero Lockhart v. Quintiny Luenelle Flakes Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Paul Thomas Hesse v. Toni Renee Wingrove Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Moslais X. Vue, n/k/a Moslais Michele Xiong v. Khue Vue Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Heather Newman, n/k/a Heather Osagiede v. Robert Newman Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Reversible abuses of discretion include misapplying the law or relyi ng on findings of fact that are not supported by the record.” Shearer v. Shearer , (quotations and citations omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Thomas Gordon Burnett v. Daniela Estefania Burnett Torres Parra Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Jeremiah John Palmquist v. Stephanie Elizabeth Devens, Joanne Mary Devens Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Tracy Wong Belcher v. Benjamin Moore Belcher, III Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A schedule is a procedural plan that indicates the time and sequence of each operation.” (quotation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Rebekah L. Bennett v. Kevin E. Bennett Minn. Ct. App. 2017
and emotional health” ( review denied (Minn. Oct.