Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In re the Marriage of: Justin David Shearer v. Mandy Jane Shearer, 891 N.W.2d 72.

95 citing documents.

In re the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2022
518A,” which deals with child support) (2020); -79 (Minn. App. 2017) (applying Minn. Stat. § 5 18A.36).
In re the Marriage of: Michelle Lynn Wilson, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Tammy Sundbom Otterson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Lisa Marie Winkowski, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“The district court has broad discretion in determining parenting -time issues and will not be reversed absent an abuse of that discretion.” d 72, 75 (Minn. App. 2017) (quotation omitted).
County of Dakota, ex rel., Michelle Marie Hinz, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Stacy Ann Rakow, f/k/a Przybilla, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“The district court has broad discretion in dete rmining parenting time issues and will not be reversed absent an abuse of that discretion.” Shearer v. Shearer , (quotation omitted).
In re the Custody of Derek Mausolf and Claire Mausolf, Nicholas Mausolf, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
District courts have “broad discretion in determining parenting-time issues and will not be reversed absent an abuse of that discretion.” (quotation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Varvara Viktorovna Tishchenko, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(custody); (parenting time).
In re the Marriage of: Andrew John Stevens, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Tiffany Elizabeth Jean Banerjee, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Trung Thien Do, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Richard Otto, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Matter of: Brooks J. Waldron, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Although we review the decision to grant or deny parenting time modification motions for an abuse of discretion, determining what legal standard applies to a request to change parenting time is a question of law that we review de novo, ).
In re the Custody of: B. L. F., Cherries Chamberlain, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Kevin James Stanton, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“The district court has broad discretion in determining parenting-time issues and will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion.” (quotations omitted).
In re the Marriage of: James Patrick Pnewski, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: John Sterling Ross, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Myles John Sterling Mankus, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Custody of: N. Y. B., James Edward Bono, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“The district court has broad discretion in determining parenting-time issues and will not be reversed absent an abuse of that discretion.” (quotation omitted).
In re the Paternity of: B. L. T., T. L. M., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Michaela Dojcinovic Bachmayer, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the matter of: Eric Thurman Clinton, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“The district court has broad discretion in determining parenting -time issues and will not be reversed absent an abuse of that discretion.” (quoting Dahl v. Dahl , ).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Custody of: R. T. R., C. T. R., and S. C. T. R., Robby Romero, … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Ngozi Egwim, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: John Richard Strosahl, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Robert William Bessenbacher, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(stating that, generally, appellate courts “review orders modifying child support for abus e of discretion”).
In re the Matter of: Bradley Joseph Patraw, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Custody of: K. M. A. Daniel Cory Johnson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Rachel Ann Hughes, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Custody of: J. K. L. Peter Romero Lockhart, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Paul Thomas Hesse, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Moslais X. Vue, n/k/a Moslais Michele Xiong, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Heather Newman, n/k/a Heather Osagiede, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Reversible abuses of discretion include misapplying the law or relyi ng on findings of fact that are not supported by the record.” Shearer v. Shearer , (quotations and citations omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Thomas Gordon Burnett, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Jeremiah John Palmquist, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Tracy Wong Belcher, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A schedule is a procedural plan that indicates the time and sequence of each operation.” (quotation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Rebekah L. Bennett, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
and emotional health” ( review denied (Minn. Oct.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by