Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Ellis-Strong, 899 N.W.2d 531.

106 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Davonte Michael Robinson Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Alexander James Ray v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Trever Joseph Palodichuk Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(citing Andersen, d at 10).
State of Minnesota v. Abdulahi Dahir Salad Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Lee Konakowitz Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Wlemonger Emmanuel Deward Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Akpene Yaa Asempa Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See State v. Ellis-Strong , (“[I]f Ellis -Strong shows his plea is invalid, he has shown both a manifest injustice and a fair -and-just reason to withdraw his plea as a matter of law.”).
State of Minnesota v. John Herbert Hodge, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(“In Minnesota, an attorney’s representation does not fall below the objective standard of 12 reasonableness .
State of Minnesota v. Edbin Jose Coreas Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Deandre Lamond Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2022
466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984); State v. Ellis-Strong
In the Matter of the Welfare of: J. C. L., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See State v. Ellis-Strong , (stating that registration is a co llateral consequence of a guilty plea).
State of Minnesota v. Jennifer Lynn Baldwin Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. David Edward Campbell Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Dequarn Markeyth Bell Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See State v. 11 Ellis-Strong, (“[F]ederal caselaw regards parole eligibility as collateral.”).
State of Minnesota v. Cassandra Lynn Sheimo Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Jamia Lee Griffith v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(quotations omitted); see Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 688 (1984).
Dylan Matthew Deling v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Mitchell Curtis Madsen Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Shanin Trevon English Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Scott Arlen Lange v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
When an ineffective -assistance-of-counsel claim is properly raised in a direct appeal, “we examine the claim under the two -prong test set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984).”
S’Emaj Avyiair Okongwu v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
9 probability that, but for counsel’s errors, [the defendant] would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Isaac Lee Kelley Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(applying the Strickland test).
State of Minnesota v. Cedric Antonio Erby Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Tywan Rulford Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(discussing Strickland).
Mitchell Le Dac Ho v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Because ineffective assistance of counsel can render a plea i nvalid, “a guilty plea based on ineffective assistance of counsel creates a manifest injustice as a matter of law.”
State of Minnesota v. Brandon Jerome Hanson Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Hinton v. Alabama, 571 U.S. 263, 274, 134 S. Ct. 1081, 1089 (2014) (“An attorney’s ignorance of a point of law that is fundamental to his case combined with his fa ilure to perform basic research on that point is a quintessential example of unreasonable performance under 11 Strickland.”); State v. Ellis-Strong , (M inn.
State of Minnesota v. DaJuan Wendell Webster Rayford Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Felix Kasper Piah v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. William Frances Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. TreJuan Dominic Miller Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Ramiro Alejandro Pena Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Gustafson , 321 (Minn. 2000); State v. Ellis-Strong
David Rucki, et al v. Deirdre Elise Evavold Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Unpublished opinions are not precedential, but they may have persuasive value.” (citing Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd.
William Marcus Daniel Edwards Appellant v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Unpublished opinions are not precedential, but they may have persuasive value.” (citing Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd.
State of Minnesota v. Raymundo Zeferino-Sanchez Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Deontray Vershon Tate v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(“An attorney’s ‘mistake of law’ because of a failure to look up a statute may amount to an objectively unreasonable performance.”).
State of Minnesota v. Vincent Illya Cotten Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Brandon Jerome Doby Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Padilla v. Kentucky , 559 U.S. 356 , 375-76, 130 S. Ct. 1473 , 1487 (2010), (Alito, J., concurring); -42 (Minn. 2007); -41 (Minn. App. 2017); (holding that failure to advise client about predatory-offender- registration requirements “does not violate a defendant’s rights to the effective assistance of counsel” because it is non -punitive).
State of Minnesota, vs Phillip Julius Butenhoff, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Isidro Carranza Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Success on this prong requires that the record contain “facts fully explai ning the reasons for [the defendant’s] decision to plead guilty.”
State of Minnesota v. Melie Ike Ilogu Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In addition, this court has stated that “a guilty plea based on ineffective assistance of counsel creates a manifest injustice as a matter of law.”
State of Minnesota v. Kyle Alan Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Usually, an ineffective-assistance- of-counsel claim must be raised in a postconviction petition for relief “because an evidentiary hearing, if granted, provides the district court with additional facts to explain the [trial counsel’s] decisions.” (citing Gustafson, d at 321).
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Mathew Erickson Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Unpublished opinions are not precedential, but they may have persuasive value.” (citing Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd.
State of Minnesota v. Justin Lee Armstrong Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Unpublished 8 opinions are not precedential, but they may have persuasive value.” (citing Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd.
State of Minnesota v. Richard Thomas Bandow Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Tanka Nath Upreti Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Scott Alan Kepner Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Leslie Paul Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(Minn. App. 2 The record is unclear as to exactly what types of animals were in appellant’s apartment, and we recognize that immediate care is a less-pressing matter for some animals.
Armando DeLaCruz, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Barbara Ann Currin v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Kendra Joanne Shulman Minn. Ct. App. 2018
3(b) (2016) (stating that “[u]npublished opinions of the Court of Appeals are not precedential”)