Cited by

(citing Andersen, d at 10).

See State v. Ellis-Strong , (“[I]f Ellis -Strong shows his plea is invalid, he has shown both a manifest injustice and a fair -and-just reason to withdraw his plea as a matter of law.”).

(“In Minnesota, an attorney’s representation does not fall below the objective standard of 12 reasonableness .

466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984); State v. Ellis-Strong

See State v. Ellis-Strong , (stating that registration is a co llateral consequence of a guilty plea).

See State v. 11 Ellis-Strong, (“[F]ederal caselaw regards parole eligibility as collateral.”).

(quotations omitted); see Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 688 (1984).

When an ineffective -assistance-of-counsel claim is properly raised in a direct appeal, “we examine the claim under the two -prong test set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984).”

9 probability that, but for counsel’s errors, [the defendant] would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial.” (quotation omitted).

(applying the Strickland test).

(discussing Strickland).

Because ineffective assistance of counsel can render a plea i nvalid, “a guilty plea based on ineffective assistance of counsel creates a manifest injustice as a matter of law.”

See Hinton v. Alabama, 571 U.S. 263, 274, 134 S. Ct. 1081, 1089 (2014) (“An attorney’s ignorance of a point of law that is fundamental to his case combined with his fa ilure to perform basic research on that point is a quintessential example of unreasonable performance under 11 Strickland.”); State v. Ellis-Strong , (M inn.

State v. Gustafson , 321 (Minn. 2000); State v. Ellis-Strong

“Unpublished opinions are not precedential, but they may have persuasive value.” (citing Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd.

“Unpublished opinions are not precedential, but they may have persuasive value.” (citing Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd.

(“An attorney’s ‘mistake of law’ because of a failure to look up a statute may amount to an objectively unreasonable performance.”).

See Padilla v. Kentucky , 559 U.S. 356 , 375-76, 130 S. Ct. 1473 , 1487 (2010), (Alito, J., concurring); -42 (Minn. 2007); -41 (Minn. App. 2017); (holding that failure to advise client about predatory-offender- registration requirements “does not violate a defendant’s rights to the effective assistance of counsel” because it is non -punitive).

Success on this prong requires that the record contain “facts fully explai ning the reasons for [the defendant’s] decision to plead guilty.”

In addition, this court has stated that “a guilty plea based on ineffective assistance of counsel creates a manifest injustice as a matter of law.”

Usually, an ineffective-assistance- of-counsel claim must be raised in a postconviction petition for relief “because an evidentiary hearing, if granted, provides the district court with additional facts to explain the [trial counsel’s] decisions.” (citing Gustafson, d at 321).

“Unpublished opinions are not precedential, but they may have persuasive value.” (citing Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd.

“Unpublished 8 opinions are not precedential, but they may have persuasive value.” (citing Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd.

(Minn. App. 2 The record is unclear as to exactly what types of animals were in appellant’s apartment, and we recognize that immediate care is a less-pressing matter for some animals.

3(b) (2016) (stating that “[u]npublished opinions of the Court of Appeals are not precedential”)