Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Madden v. Madden, 923 N.W.2d 688.

72 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A district court abuses its discretion if, am ong other things, it “misapplies the law[] or 8 resolves the matter in a manner that is cont rary to logic and the facts on record.”
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
precludes the court from awarding, in its discretion, additional fees, costs, and disbursements against a party who unreasonably contribut es to the length or expense of the proceeding.” The fees provided for in this section are typically referred to as “conduct-based fees.” 10 The party seeking conduct-based fees has the burden to show that the othe r party unreasonably in creased the length or 10 Neither party addresses whether section 518.14 provides a substantive basis for an award of conduc
In re the Marriage of: Martin Sean Schmidt, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Julie Ann Schmidt, Appellant. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Curtis, d at 252; d 688, 696 (Minn. App. 2019).
William Gunder Reppe Jr., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Rupam Sinha, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Mary Ann Fenlon, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A district court abuses its discretion if, among other things, it “misapplies the law, or resolves the matter in a manner that is contrary to logic and the facts on record.”
In re the Marriage of: Ajay K. Israni, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
On the other hand, “an award of permanent spousal maintenance is more appropriate if it is uncertain that the spouse seeking maintenance can ever become self-supporting.” Madden v. Madden , –96 (Minn. App. 2019) (quotation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: James Patrick Pnewski, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Kimberly JoAnn Wauzynski, n/k/a/ Kimberly JoAnn Denne, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A district court abuses its discretion when it “misapplies the law, or resolves the matter in a manner that is contrary to logic and the facts on the record.”
In re the Marriage of: John Gordon Lewis, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
at D1 (Gildea, C.J., dissenting)
In re the Marriage of: Jane Swenson Amdal, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Edith Ponciano, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
But “[w]hen awarding spousal maintenance, a district court must consider all income of the requesting spouse.” (quotation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
d 688, 702 (Minn. App. 2019).
In re the Marriage of: Jill Melisa Sinda, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Erika Lynn Huerta, nka Erika Lynn Mazzitello, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Susan Lee Wood, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(“For purposes of this appeal, we will assume without deciding that the statute [provides a substantive basis for an award of conduct-based fees].”).
In re the Marriage of: Benjamin Walter Eidem, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Mary Elizabeth Moline, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Marie Tiedke, nka Kathleen Marie Freitag, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
at D-1 (Gildea, C.J., dissenting) ; see also Madden v. Madden
In re the Marriage of: Lauri Sue Browning, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
2(e) (citing Minn. Stat. § 518.552 (2018)); -36 (Minn. 2009)

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by