Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Madden v. Madden, 923 N.W.2d 688.

73 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Julie Karen Johnson v. Thomas Francis Johnson, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In re the Marriage of: Laura Marie Knutsen v. Peder Nels Knutsen Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(need-based); -03 (Minn. App. 2019) (conduct-based).
In re the Marriage of: Michael Raymond Baer v. Kelley Michelle Baer Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“If a party requests spousal maintenance, a district court must engage in a two-step analysis.”
In the Marriage of: Vydehi Aravalli v. Rajagopal Naga Aravalli Minn. Ct. App. 2026
16 “If a party requests spousal maintenance, a district court must engage in a two-step analysis.”
In re the Marriage of: Diana Jakubauskiene v. Robertas Jakubauskas Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(need); -03 (Minn. App. 2019) (conduct).
In the Marriage of: Todd Charles Sherette v. Melissa Ann Sherette Minn. Ct. App. 2026
A district court abuses its discretion “if it makes findings of fact that are not supported by the record, misapplies the law, or resolves the matter in a manner that is contrary to logic and the facts on record.”
In the Marriage of: Alisha Christine Steinolfson v. Christopher Steingrimur Steinolfson Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Marriage of: Alisha Christine Steinolfson v. Christopher Steingrimur Steinolfson Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Marriage of: Rebecca Wood Gagnon v. Paul John Gagnon Minn. Ct. App. 2026
A district court abuses its discretion “if it makes findings of fact that are not supported by the record, misapplies the law, or resolves the matter in a manner that is contrary to logic and the facts on record.” d 688, 696 (Minn. App. 2019).
In the Marriage of: Jeneen Marie Molldrem v. Kevin Daniel Molldrem Minn. Ct. App. 2026
A district court abuses its discretion “if it makes findings of fact that are not supported by the record, misapplies the law, or resolves the matter in a manner that is contrary to logic and the facts on record.”
In the Marriage of: Sarah Nicole Smith v. Jonathan George Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Marriage of: Sarah Nicole Smith v. Jonathan George Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-03 (Minn. App. 2019) (applying abuse-of-discretion standard to an award of conduct- 2 This statute was amended during the pendency of this action, effective for proceedings “commenced on or after” August 1, 2024.
In re the Marriage of Zachary Dean Hollingsworth v. Anne Marie Halling Roe Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Marriage of Zachary Dean Hollingsworth v. Anne Marie Halling Roe Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“If a party requests spousal maintenance, a district court must engage in a two-step analysis.”
In the Marriage of: Aimee Lynn Speier v. Gary Joseph Speier, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Marriage of: John Andrew Sinnott v. Kelli Anne Sinnott, n/k/a Kelli Anne Erickson Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Marriage of: Mark S. Steinmetz v. Darlene D. Steinmetz Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A district court may modify an existing spousal-maintenance order if the party seeking modification “makes a showing of a substantial change in circumstances that makes the existing award unreasonable and unfair.” (quotation omitted).
In the Marriage of: Roberta Jo Nickel v. Joshua Peter Nickel, County of Cottonwood Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A district court abuses its discretion when it “makes findings of fact that are not supported by the record, misapplies the law, or resolves the matter in a manner that is contrary to logic and the facts on record.”
In the Marriage of: Neil Mark Hatfield v. Jennifer M. Hatfield, County of Itasca, Intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2025
1 (2022)); – 03 (Minn. App. 2019) (applying an abuse-of-discretion standard of review to an award of conduct-based attorney fees under Minn. Stat. § 518.14, subd.
In re the Marriage of: Ryan Russell Preusse v. Amanda Jayne Preusse Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Marriage of: Ryan Russell Preusse v. Amanda Jayne Preusse Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A district court abuses its discretion “if it makes findings of fact that are not supported by the record, misapplies the law, or resolves the matter in a manner that is contrary to logic and the facts on record.”
In the Marriage of: Amy Nicole Solinger v. Jason Mark Solinger Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Marriage of: Mary Ellen Rice (FKA) Block v. William Ray Block Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A district court abuses its discretion when it “makes findings of fact that are not supported by the record, misapplies the law, or resolves the matter in a manner that is contrary to logic and the facts on the record.”
In re the Marriage of: Brent Lee Florine v. Lauren Marie Florine Minn. Ct. App. 2025
When “a modification decision depends on findings of fact, we apply a clear error standard of review to those findings of fact.” ().
In re the Marriage of: Lauren Elizabeth Schrock v. Richard Albert Kuhn Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Tracie Kay Fowler v. Erwin James Fowler, III Minn. Ct. App. 2024
A district court abuses its discretion “if it makes findings of fact that are not supported by the record, misapplies the law, or resolves the matter in a manner that is contrary to logic and the facts on record.” Madden v. Madden
In re the Marriage of: Teresa Marie Nordahl v. Steven Edward Nordahl Minn. Ct. App. 2024
A district court may modify an award of spousal maintenance if the party seeking such modification demonstrates “a substantial change in circumstances that makes the existing award ‘unreasonable and unfair.’” (quoting Minn. Stat. § 518A.39, subd.
Peter K Butler v. Shari Moore, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Peter K Butler v. Shari Moore, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2024
A district court abuses its discretion “if it makes findings of fact that are not supported by the record, misapplies the law, or resolves the matter in a manner that is contrary to logic and the facts on record.” d 688, 696 (Minn. App. 2019).
Allison Marie Wolf v. John Roman Schmainda Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Allison Marie Wolf v. John Roman Schmainda Minn. Ct. App. 2024
A district court abuses its discretion “if it makes findings of fact that are not supported by the record, misapplies the law, or resolves the matter in a manner that is contrary to logic and the facts on record.”
In re the Marriage of: Daniel Stephen Nelson v. Katherine Lynn Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
A district court abuses its discretion “if it makes findings of fact that are not supported by the record, misapplies the law, or resolves the matter in a 5 manner that is contrary to logic and the facts on record.” d 688, 696 (Minn. App. 2019).
Lindsay Allyn Yates Plumer v. Joseph Mark Plumer, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Lindsay Allyn Yates Plumer v. Joseph Mark Plumer, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
A district court abuses its discretion “if it makes findings of fact that are not supported by the record, misapplies the law, or resolves the matter in a manner that is contrary to logic and the facts on record.” d 688, 696 (Minn. App. 2019).
In re the Marriage of: Robert William Bessenbacher v. Olga Sergeyevna Bessenbacher, Itasca County Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Marriage of: Robert William Bessenbacher v. Olga Sergeyevna Bessenbacher, Itasca County Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“A district court abuses its discretion in making such a decision if it makes findings of fact that are not supported by the record, misapplies the law, or resolves the matter in a manner that is contrary to logic and the facts on record.” see Woolsey, d at 506 (same); (same).
In re the Marriage of: Beverly Denise Kossack v. Kenneth Joseph Kossack Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Marriage of: Deborah Ann Barnett v. Timothy John Barnett Minn. Ct. App. 2023
5 v. Madden, see also Minn. Stat. § 518.552, subd.
In re the Marriage of: Angela Marie Backman v. Charles Robert Backman Minn. Ct. App. 2023
SYLLABUS On a motion to modify an award of permanent spousal maintenance, this court’s , prevents the district court from finding that the obligee has potential income only if the obligor argues that the obligee failed to make reasonable efforts to increase his or her earning capacity by obtaining additional education or vocational training.
In re the Marriage of: Pawel Dominik Rzeczkowski v. Carolina Uribe Borrero Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“If a party requests spousal maintenance, a district court must engage in a two-step analysis.”
In re the Marriage of: Kimberly Erin Macfarlane v. Bruce Travis Adam Macfarlane Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Michael F. Kohorst v. Teressa L. Kohorst Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Elizabeth Ann Jones Chidothe v. Edward Chidothe Minn. Ct. App. 2022
( taking same approach).
Katherine Dillard Rice Hayes v. Augustus Conrade Thomas Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“A district court abuses its discretion ‘if it makes findings of fact that are not supported by the record, misapplies the law, or resolves the matter in a manner that is contrary to logic and the facts on record.’” ().
In re the Marriage of: Mark David Plucinski v. Ellen Marie Budzynski Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Megan Marie Johnson v. Richard Preston Blackwell Minn. Ct. App. 2022
A district court abuses its discretion “if it ma kes findings of fact that ar e not supported by the record, misapplies the law, or resolves the matter in a manner that is contrary to logic and the facts on record.”
In re the Marriage of: David Paul Andresen v. Leslie Ann Andresen Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Breanna Marie Borth v. Matthew Joseph Borth Minn. Ct. App. 2022
A district court abuses its discretion “if it ma kes findings of fact that ar e not supported by the record, misapplies the law, or resolves the matter in a manner that is contrary to logic and the facts on record.”
Sokkhan Ka v. Mai Yia Vang Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: John Thomas Peterson v. Colleen Marie Peterson Minn. Ct. App. 2021