Cited by

d 580, 582 (Minn. 1988); (citing this aspect of Thiele in a civil-commitment appeal), rev. denied (Minn. June 21, 2016).

We generally only consider issues that “were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” ().

Just as a party cannot obtain appellate review of an issue not raised to the ULJ, a party may not “obtain review by raising the same general issue litigated below but under a different theory.”

(stating parties generally not allowed to raise either new issues or new theories on appeal).

(holding that reviewing court must generally consider only issues previously considered and decided); (applying Thiele rule in appeal from agency decision).

See Thiele v. Stich , (stating that appellate courts do not decide issues that have not been considered by the district court).

(noting the principle that an appellate court generally will not consider matters not argued to and considered by the district court).

2 Setting aside Sauve’s failure to preserve any error in a new-trial motion, Sauve’s brief to this court also fails to articulate what irregularity occurred or how he was deprived 2 Similarly, appellate courts “generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted).

Because we generally consider only those matters that were argued to and decided by the district court

“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” d 580, 582 (Minn. 1988) (quotation omitted).

6 (stating that appellate courts generally address only those questions previously presented to and considered by the district court).

alified from possessing firearms because, after the 2023 amendments removed his offenses from the 7 definition of “crimes of violence,” he no longer has disqualifying convictions on his record.2 But this is a different argument than the argument he made to the district court, and appellate courts do not consider arguments not made to and considered by the district court.3

See Thiele v. Stich , (stating that an appellate court “must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it” (quotation omitted)).

(stating that appellate courts generally address only issues presented to and considered by the district court).

App. P. 110.01 (defining the record on appeal); –83 (Minn. 1988) (emphasizing that appellate courts cannot base their rulings on matters outside the record on appeal).

(stating that appellate courts generally address only those questions previously presented to and considered by the district court).

See Thiele v. Stich , (“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court .

-83 (Minn. 1988) (“An appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal, and may not consider matters not produced and received in evidence below”).

See Thiele v. Stich , (stating that appellate courts generally may consider only issues raised to and considered by the district court).

(“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.

us. Thiele v. Stich , (stating that appellate courts generally address only those questions previously presented to and considered by the district court).

(holding that failure to raise issue in district court precludes consideration on appeal); -83 (Minn. 1988) (“An appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal, and may not consider matters not produced and received in evidence.”).

d 580, 582 (Minn. 1988) (quotation omitted).

(“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented [to] and considered by the [district] court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted)).

See Macy’s Retail Holdings, n.2 (Minn. 2017) ().

“An appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal, and may not consider matters not produced and received in evidence below.” -83 (Minn. 1988).

Assocs., (stating that appellate courts generally address only those questions previously presented to and considered by the district court).

“A reviewing court must generally consider ‘only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court.’ ” (quoting Thayer v. Am.

But “[a] party may not ‘obtain review by raising the same general issue litigated below but under a different theory.’” n.2 (Minn. 2015) (d 580, 582 (Minn. 1988)).

–83 (Minn. 1988) (stating that a party may not obtain review on “the same general issue litigated below but under a different theory” and concluding that the court of appeals improperly considered a question not litigated in the district court); (declining to rea

(declining to consider an issue raised for the first time on appeal).