Cited by

(stating general rule “that litigants are bound [on appeal] by the theory or theories, however erroneous or improvident, upon which the action was actually tried below”).

(“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted)).

(“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted)); see also Singelman v. St.

“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” Thiele v. Stich , -83 (Minn. 1988); see also Hoyt Inv.

(concluding that appellate courts only consider issues presented to and considered by district court).

or of the bus must be viewed in light of the duty he owed to the child a t the time and place of the accident” and rejecting the plaintiff’s view that the bus driver should have anticipated that his speed as he approached the intersection “would increase or diminish the danger of 3 It is arguable that appellant is raising a new negligence theory on appeal, in violation of Thiele v. Stich , (“Nor may a party obtain review by raising the same general issue litigated below but under a different the

This new argument is not properly before us, s ee Lewis-Miller, d at 570 (), but we address it in the interests of justice.

“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court.” ().

“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented [to] and considered by the [district] court in deciding the matter before it.” Thiele v. Stich , (quotation omitted).

(stating that appellate courts generally address only those questions previously presented to and considered by the district court).

(asserting that appellate courts generally will not consider matters not argued to or considered by the district court).

Assocs., (stating that appellate courts generally address only those questions previously presented to and considered by lower court).

d 580, 582 (Minn. 1988) (“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.”).

(holding appellate courts do not consider arguments not “presented and considered by the [district] court” (quotation omitted)), (explaining that an argument is forfeited if a party does not cite to, and analyze, applicable law).

(“ A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted)).

And because we generally do not consider arguments not raised before and decided by the district court, we need not address his contention that the district court errantly relied on his refusal to testify to draw an adverse inference that his actions were sexually motivated.

“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” -83 (Minn. 1988) (quotation omitted).

- 83 (Minn. 1988); (noting “the record in a certiorari appeal consists of the papers filed, the exhibits, and transcripts” (citing Minn. R. Civ.

(stating that appellate courts generally address only those questions previously presented to and considered by the district court).

(stating 13 that we generally address only those questions previously presented to and considered by the district court).

Assocs., d 173, 175 (Minn. 1988); (stating that appellate courts generally address only those questions previously presented to and considered by the district court).

It is well settled that appellate courts “generally will not decide issues which were not raised before the district court.” d 354, 357 (Minn. 1996); (stating that appellate courts do not consider issues on appeal that were not p resented to, and considered by, the district court).

As a result, (stating that appellate courts generally address only those questions previously presented to and considered by the district court).

Appellate courts “generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted).

(stating that generally, a reviewing court must only consider issues that were presented to and considered by the district court).

“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” ().

consider matters not produced and received in evidence below.” -83 (Minn. 1988); see also Minn. R. Civ.

Generally, “[a]n appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal, and may not consider matters not produced and received in evidence below.” -83 (Minn. 1988).

We generally consider “only those issues that the record shows were presented [to] and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted).

(stating that appellate courts generally address only those questions previously presented to and considered by the district court).

(“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.”) (quotation omitted)).

Therefore, (stating appellate courts “must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the [district] court in deciding the matter before it.” () (other quotation omitted)).

(stating that appellate courts generally address only those questions previously presented to and considered by the district court); Moorhead Econ.

(holding that appellate courts must only consider arguments that were “presented and considered” by the district court (quotation omitted)).

“An appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal, and may not consider matters not produced and received in evidence below.” –83 (Minn. 1988).

“An appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal, and may not consider matters not produced and received in evidence below.” -83 (Minn. 1988).

12 “A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented [to] and considered by the [district] court in deciding the matter before it.” Thiele v. Stich , (quotation omitted).