Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite STATE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY BY THE SPECIAL COMPENSATION FUND v. Wintz Parcel Dri…, 558 N.W.2d 480.

352 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Abdihafid Hariri Hassan Yusuf, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed question).
Nicholas Rowe v. City of Minneapolis, Self-Insured, Relator Minn. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to reach issue in the absence of adequate briefing).
Wells Fargo Bank, NA, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed question).
In Re the Custody of L.B.O.; Bibi Whited v. Kenzie Quinn, Tyler Ohman, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to review question that was not adequately briefed); (applying Wintz in a family-law appeal).
Anna Rae Dosso and On Behalf of Minor Children, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately-briefed issue).
GEP XI Maple Grove LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (noting that a reviewing court may decline to consider issu es that are inadequately briefed).
Bruce Allen, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., see Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., (explaining that “assignment[s] of error based on mere assertion and not supported by any argument or authorities in appellant’s brief [are] waived and will not be considered on appeal unless prejudicial error is
Troy Kenneth Scheffler, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc.
In Re the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
5 Inc., (applying Wintz in a family-law appeal).
City of Ellendale, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., see also Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., (stating that “an assignment of error” in a brief “based on mere assertion and not supported by argument or [authority]” is waived “unless prejudicial error is obvious on mere inspection”).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Craig Seitzer. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address inadequately briefed issue); Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. P’ship, n.2 3 Seitzer references a transcript that he says shows he “advocated against medications and no need for antipsychotics but a push for therapy” and that he and his doctor at one
In Re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to review question that was not adequately briefed); (applying Wintz in family law appeal).
Kidane Sante Shulbe, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed question); (applying this aspect of Wintz in a family-law appeal).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. M. D., C. J. M. and T. … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
We nonetheless briefly address the alleged errors identified in the headings and conclude that, even if we were to reach the merits of the issues, we would still affirm.4 Drivers, Inc., (declining to review question that was not adequately briefed); (applying Wintz in a family-law appeal).
Kimberly Sollars, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (stating that appellate courts generally “decline to reach [an] issue in the absence of adequate briefing”); Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., (“An assignment of error based on mere assertion and not supported by any argument or authorities in appella
In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc.
Kirstin Arneson, Relator v. St Cloud Auto Sales.Com LLC, Department of Employment and Economic ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Matter of the Licensing Order Issued to North Sierra Construction, LLC, and Louis Dee Sierra Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Kirstin Arneson, Relator v. St Cloud Auto Sales.Com LLC, Department of Employment and Economic ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (stating that appellate courts may decline to reach issues that are inadequately briefed).
In the Matter of the Licensing Order Issued to North Sierra Construction, LLC, and Louis Dee Sierra Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to reach inadequately briefed issue).
Pedcor Management Corp, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (stating that appellate courts “decline to reach [an] issue in the absence of adequate briefing”).
In Re the Custody of MIVB; Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed question); (applying Wintz in a family- law appeal).
Magnifi Financial Credit Union, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child(ren) of: T. K. H., B. M. P., G. J. … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child(ren) of: T. K. H., B. M. P., G. J. … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address inadequately briefed question); (noting that inadequately briefed questions are not properly before an appellate court); n.1 (Minn. App. 2003) (applying Wintz in a juvenile-prot
Dametria White, et al., as co-trustees for the next-of-kin of Helayne Bass, deceased, Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., ; see also Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., (stating that an assignment of error in a brief “based on mere assertion” and not supported by argument or authority is waived “unless prejudicial error is obvious on mere inspection”).
In Re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to review question that was not adequately briefed); (applying Wintz in a family- law appeal).
Grande Market Place Limited Partnership v. Yolanda Salgado, Yazmine Brown Salgado, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Grande Market Place Limited Partnership v. Yolanda Salgado, Yazmine Brown Salgado, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., d 480, 480 (Minn. 1997) (declining to reach inadequately briefed issue).
Peter Richard Rickmyer, Appellant, vs. Xenos Letoi Brooks, R e s pondent. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc.
Kidane Sante Shulbe v. Ashley Rose Henke Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Kidane Sante Shulbe v. Ashley Rose Henke Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc.
Amber Jemison v. Child Protection Service Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Amber Jemison v. Child Protection Service Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address inadequately briefed issue).
TE Miller Development LLC v. Corey Devante Jones, John Doe Minn. Ct. App. 2025
TE Miller Development LLC v. Corey Devante Jones, John Doe Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (stating that appellate courts “decline to reach [an] issue in the absence of adequate briefing”); Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., (“An assignment of error based on mere assertion and not supported by any argument or authorities in appellant’s brief
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: S. F., Commissioner of Children, Youth, and Families, … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: S. F., Commissioner of Children, Youth, and Families, … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (indicating that appellate courts decline to reach issues that are inadequately briefed); see also Minn. R. Civ.
In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address inadequately briefed question); (applying Wintz to an appeal of a marriage-dissolution judgment).
Brindalyn P. Foster, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (stating that appellate courts “decline to reach [an] issue in the absence of adequate briefing”).
In re the Estate of Lillian Clara Wennes, Decedent. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to consider inadequately briefed issue).
In the Matter of Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to reach issue raised on appeal “in the absence of adequate briefing”).
Valerie Steiner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address constitutional issues raised for 12 the first time on appeal).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Kadyn Star Scherer. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., see In re Civ.
In Re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
& Indus., v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (stating that appellate courts may “decline to reach [an] issue in the absence of adequate briefing”); (stating “[a]lthough some accommodations may be made for pro se litigants, this court has repeatedly emphasized that pro
Deanna M. Kortan, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc. , (declining to address an inadequately briefed issue).
In re the Guardianship of Devin Ziegler. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to consider inadequately briefed issue); (applying this concept in probate appeal).
In the Matter of the Appeal of the determination of the Responsible Authority for the Minnesota Department of … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to reach issue that was inadequately briefed).
A24-1031 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to reach inadequately briefed issues).