Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite STATE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY BY THE SPECIAL COMPENSATION FUND v. Wintz Parcel Dri…, 558 N.W.2d 480.

359 citing documents.

Susan Thompson v. Paul Schnell, Commissioner, Department of Corrections, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc.
In Re. the Marriage of: Michelle Dorothea McKenna-Koziura v. Amy Nicole Koziura Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to reach inadequately briefed issue).
In the Matter of: Sarah Rose Vasquez on behalf of Minor Child v. Destiny Marie Rodriguez Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed question).
State of Minnesota v. Quenton Tyrone Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address inadequately briefed issue).
Michael Kwabena Asiedu v. Terry Eastlund, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address inadequately briefed question).
In re the SUPERVISED Estate of David Victor Page, Deceased Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (citing Wintz in probate case).
Kaylee Anne Vartanian OBO Elena Jo Vartanian-Dixon v. Hillary Anne Laska Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed question).
In re the Marriage of: Abdihafid Hariri Hassan Yusuf v. Neama Omar Y Al Somali Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed question).
Nicholas Rowe v. City of Minneapolis, Self-Insured, Relator Minn. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to reach issue in the absence of adequate briefing).
Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Dragomir Penchev Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed question).
In Re the Custody of L.B.O.; Bibi Whited, et al v. Kenzie Quinn, Tyler Ohman, Rachel Norgaard, et … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to review question that was not adequately briefed); (applying Wintz in a family-law appeal).
Anna Rae Dosso and On Behalf of Minor Children v. Ben Dosso Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately-briefed issue).
GEP XI Maple Grove LLC v. Dofa Liban Mohamed, Adna Ahmed, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc.
In re the Marriage of: Margarita Alexandra Johannson v. John Joseph Johannson Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (noting that a reviewing court may decline to consider issu es that are inadequately briefed).
Bruce Allen v. City of Waconia Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., see Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., (explaining that “assignment[s] of error based on mere assertion and not supported by any argument or authorities in appellant’s brief [are] waived and will not be considered on appeal unless prejudicial error is
Troy Kenneth Scheffler v. Rosemary R. Franzen, Joshua M Heintzeman, et al., Lowell A Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc.
In Re the Matter of: Reuben Lopez Avery v. Teri Joanne Avery Minn. Ct. App. 2026
5 Inc., (applying Wintz in a family-law appeal).
City of Ellendale v. Daniel Petsinger, Carrie Petsinger Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., see also Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., (stating that “an assignment of error” in a brief “based on mere assertion and not supported by argument or [authority]” is waived “unless prejudicial error is obvious on mere inspection”).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Craig Seitzer Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address inadequately briefed issue); Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. P’ship, n.2 3 Seitzer references a transcript that he says shows he “advocated against medications and no need for antipsychotics but a push for therapy” and that he and his doctor at one
In Re the Marriage of: Emily Brasel Brown v. Iyulli Ben Hyyiah Brown Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to review question that was not adequately briefed); (applying Wintz in family law appeal).
Kidane Sante Shulbe v. Ashley Rose Henke, St. Louis County Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed question); (applying this aspect of Wintz in a family-law appeal).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. M. D., C. J. M. and T. … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
We nonetheless briefly address the alleged errors identified in the headings and conclude that, even if we were to reach the merits of the issues, we would still affirm.4 Drivers, Inc., (declining to review question that was not adequately briefed); (applying Wintz in a family-law appeal).
Kimberly Sollars v. Minnesota Department of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (stating that appellate courts generally “decline to reach [an] issue in the absence of adequate briefing”); Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., (“An assignment of error based on mere assertion and not supported by any argument or authorities in appella
In the Marriage of: Todd Charles Sherette v. Melissa Ann Sherette Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc.
Kirstin Arneson v. St Cloud Auto Sales.Com LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Matter of the Licensing Order Issued to North Sierra Construction, LLC, and Louis Dee Sierra Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Kirstin Arneson v. St Cloud Auto Sales.Com LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (stating that appellate courts may decline to reach issues that are inadequately briefed).
In the Matter of the Licensing Order Issued to North Sierra Construction, LLC, and Louis Dee Sierra Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to reach inadequately briefed issue).
Pedcor Management Corp v. Becky Pate, Trenton Pate, John Doe, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (stating that appellate courts “decline to reach [an] issue in the absence of adequate briefing”).
In Re the Custody of MIVB; Dustin Allen Basting v. Heather Mae Grehn Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed question); (applying Wintz in a family- law appeal).
Magnifi Financial Credit Union v. Harriet Lewis, The Patio Park Association, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child(ren) of: T. K. H., B. M. P., G. J. … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child(ren) of: T. K. H., B. M. P., G. J. … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address inadequately briefed question); (noting that inadequately briefed questions are not properly before an appellate court); n.1 (Minn. App. 2003) (applying Wintz in a juvenile-prot
Dametria White, et al., as co-trustees for the next-of-kin of Helayne Bass, deceased v. Park Nicollet Clinic Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., ; see also Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., (stating that an assignment of error in a brief “based on mere assertion” and not supported by argument or authority is waived “unless prejudicial error is obvious on mere inspection”).
In Re the Marriage of: Erica Leigh Riehm v. Harold Andrew Riehm Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to review question that was not adequately briefed); (applying Wintz in a family- law appeal).
Grande Market Place Limited Partnership v. Yolanda Salgado, Yazmine Brown Salgado Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Grande Market Place Limited Partnership v. Yolanda Salgado, Yazmine Brown Salgado Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., d 480, 480 (Minn. 1997) (declining to reach inadequately briefed issue).
Peter Richard Rickmyer, Appellant, vs. Xenos Letoi Brooks, R e s pondent. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc.
Kidane Sante Shulbe v. Ashley Rose Henke Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Kidane Sante Shulbe v. Ashley Rose Henke Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc.
Amber Jemison v. Child Protection Service, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Amber Jemison v. Child Protection Service, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address inadequately briefed issue).
TE Miller Development LLC v. Corey Devante Jones, John Doe, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2025
TE Miller Development LLC v. Corey Devante Jones, John Doe, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (stating that appellate courts “decline to reach [an] issue in the absence of adequate briefing”); Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., (“An assignment of error based on mere assertion and not supported by any argument or authorities in appellant’s brief
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: S. F., Commissioner of Children, Youth, and Families, … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: S. F., Commissioner of Children, Youth, and Families, … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (indicating that appellate courts decline to reach issues that are inadequately briefed); see also Minn. R. Civ.
In the Marriage of: Hewan Michael Hundessa v. Tesfa Bekele Balcha Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address inadequately briefed question); (applying Wintz to an appeal of a marriage-dissolution judgment).
Brindalyn P. Foster v. Fairview Health Services Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (stating that appellate courts “decline to reach [an] issue in the absence of adequate briefing”).
In re the Estate of Lillian Clara Wennes, Decedent Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to consider inadequately briefed issue).
In the Matter of Jesse Michael Campbell and On Behalf of Minor Children v. Raenell Sue Oelkers Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to reach issue raised on appeal “in the absence of adequate briefing”).