Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bebo v. Delander, 632 N.W.2d 732.

64 citing documents.

Ashley Anderson v. Adam Aaron Anderson, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“But a plaintiff must prove the remaining elements to succeed in a defamation action.” rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
Kimberly Hamson, et al v. The Foothills Christian Academy Society of Backus, MN, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Cheryl M. Shega v. American Bank of the North, et al., Laura Craig, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Larry Walters, et al v. Kyle Stromstad, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2025
And “[a] motion to amend a complaint is properly denied when the additional claim could not survive summary judgment.” (citing M.H.
State of Minnesota by Peters Sunset Beach, Inc., et al v. Pope County Minn. Ct. App. 2024
This is the case if “the additional claim could not survive summary judgment.” d 732, 740 (Minn. App. 2001), rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
Emily Anick v. Frank Bonsante Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Courts consider four factors when determining whether a statement is one of fact or opinion: (1) the precision and specificity of the statement; (2) the 7 statement’s verifiability; (3) the social and literary context of the statement; and (4) the public context in which the statement was made.” rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
John P. Norusis v. John Goodfellow, et al., Peter Reich, et al., Andrew Kramer, et al., Larry Whitaker … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
e to [Norusis], the [district c]ourt will analyze these statements at face value, but there is a good argument to be made that [Norusis] mischaracterized what Mary Whitaker and Anne Reich said.” 8 the four element s of a defamation claim is that the statement must tend to harm the complainant’s reputation and lower the complainant in the estimation of the community);4 (stating that, for a defamation claim to be actionable, complainants must also prove that they have suffered actual damages), rev
Credo Salon and Spa, Inc. v. Liberty Village I, LLC, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(“A moti on to amend a complaint is properly denied when the additional claim could not survive summary judgment.”), rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
Jesse Smith v. City of Crosby, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Croix Holdings, LLC v. City of Newport Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“A successful claim requires proof of all five elements.” rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
Timothy Soboleski, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Frank Soboleski, Patrick Frank Soboleski, et al … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Moreover, “[a] motion to amend a complaint is properly deni ed when the additional clai m could not survive summary judgment.” Bebo v. Delander , rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
Mary Jane Gross v. Prestige Parking & Valet LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2021
review denied (Minn. Oct.
Jomari E. Alexander, Sr. v. Paul Strong, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“[S]ummary judgment is mandatory against a party who fail s to establish an esse ntial element of the claim, if that party has the burden of proof, because this failure renders all other facts immaterial.” Bebo v. Delander , (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Oct.
Jomari E Alexander, Sr., Majestic Dreams Holding Co. v. Laurie Ball Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See id.; review denied (Minn. Oct.
James Jesse Hunter v. Kim Coughlin, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“For this reason, even vulgar language or name-calling is not necessarily defamation.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
Brian Madison v. Todd County, et al., Morrison County, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
6 review denied (Minn. Oct.
Red Star Group, LLC, d/b/a Cheers v. 1933 Lyndale, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2021
review denied (Minn. Oct.
Mark Moe v. Perham Stockyards, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Oct.
Jeffrey C. Brown PLLC, et al v. Gold Star Taxi and Transportation Service Corporation, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Bebo v. Delander , review denied (Minn. Oct.
Midland Funding LLC, et al v. Joy Ford Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Bebo v. Delander , , review denied (Minn. Oct.
Paul Stepnes v. Beth Trautman, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Moreover, “[a] motion to amend a complaint is properly denied when the additional claim could not survive summary judgment.” Bebo v. Delander , review denied (Minn. Oct.
A Xiong v. Minneapolis Public Schools, Special School District No. 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Bebo v. Delander , , review denied (Minn. Oct.
Thomas Sullivan, as guardian and conservator for Marc L. Beeman v. Randy F. Boggio Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Bebo v. Delander , , review denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of the Bette R. Peterson Revocable Trust, Dated August 8, 1996, as Amended, In the … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Rather, the nonmoving party must present specific facts to satisfy its burd en and “may not rely upon mere averments in the pleadings or unsupported allegations.” Bebo v. Delander , review denied (Minn. Oct.
County of Sherburne v. Steven D. Weese, vs. County of Sherburne, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Rather, the nonmoving party must present specific facts to satisfy its burden and may not rely upon “mere averments in the pleadings or unsupported allegations.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
Dorene Larson, as Trustee for the heirs of Megan Marie Lehner v. Joseph Robert Schramel, Ashley Marie Gieseke, … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Bebo v. Delander , review denied (Minn. Oct.
Abdiaziz H. Hirsi v. ARCH Language Network, Inc. d/b/a ARCH Language, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Oct.
Rodney Wayne Kesanen v. Dawn Strope-Robinson Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Summary judgment “is mandatory against a party who fails to es tablish an essential element of [the] claim, if that party has the burden of proof.” d 732, 737 (Minn. App. 2001) (altern ation in original) (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Oct.
Vickie Apel v. Mankato Rehabilitation Center, Inc., d/b/a MRCI WorkSource, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(“A motion to amend a complaint is properly denied when the additional claim could not survive summary judgment.”) , review denied (Minn. Oct.
In re the Appeal from the Order of the Joint Board of Kandiyohi and Meeker Counties Acting as … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Bebo v. Delander , review denied (Minn. Oct.
Generations Law Office, Ltd. v. Lonny D. Thomas, Mark A. Severson, et al., and Thomas Law, P.A., et … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
d 732, 740 (Minn. App. 2001) (listing verifiability a s one of four factors to consider when determining whether a statement is one of opinion or fact) , review denied (Minn. Oct.
Ellis Olkon, et al v. City of Medina Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Bridgette A. Allan v. United Piping, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
d 732, 737 (Minn. App. 2001) (stating that summary judgment is required when a party fails to establish an essential element of a claim for which that par ty has the burden of proof), review denied (Minn. Oct.
Patrick Takuanyi, et al v. Center National Bank, N.A., Advanced Recovery Solutions, LLC, Dynasty Motors, LLC, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Bebo v. Delander , review denied (Minn. Oct.
Kimberly L. Meyer, et al., William Buskey, et al v. American Legion Post #270, d/b/a Buffalo American Legion … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Kimberly L. Meyer, et al., William Buskey, et al v. American Legion Post #270, d/b/a Buffalo American Legion … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Rochester City Lines, Co., d at 661; DLH, d 732, 737 (Minn. App. 2001), review denied (Minn. Oct.
The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee For The Certificateholders Of CWABS Inc., Asset-backed Certificates, Series 2007-6 … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee For The Certificateholders Of CWABS Inc., Asset-backed Certificates, Series 2007-6 … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Once the moving party has made a prima facie case that entitles it to summary judgment, the burden shifts to the nonmoving party to produce specific facts that raise a genuine issue for trial.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
Tony’s Construction v. Kraus-Anderson Construction Company, St. Louis County Schools - ISD #2142 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Tony’s Construction v. Kraus-Anderson Construction Company, St. Louis County Schools - ISD #2142 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Once the moving party has made a prima facie case that entitles it to summary judgment, the burden shifts to the nonmoving party to produce specific facts that raise a genuine issue for trial.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Scott Richard Seelye Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Scott Richard Seelye Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“[T]he liberality to be shown in the allowance of amendments to pleadings depends in part upon the stage of the action and in a great measure upon the facts and circumstance of the particular case.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
Isanti Estates, LLC v. McCarthy Well Company, McCullough & Sons, Incorporated d/b/a McCullough & Sons Well Drilling, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Isanti Estates, LLC v. McCarthy Well Company, McCullough & Sons, Incorporated d/b/a McCullough & Sons Well Drilling, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
The “liberality to be shown in the allowance of amendments to pleadings depends in part upon the stage of the action and in great measure upon the facts and circumstances of the particular case.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
Estate of Howard G. Boyd, Decedent Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Estate of Howard G. Boyd, Decedent Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“[T]he liberality to be shown in the allowance of amendments to pleadings depends in part upon the stage of the action and in a great measure upon the facts and circumstances of the particular case.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
In re the Matter of the Petition of Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, For a New Certificate of Title After … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of the Petition of Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, For a New Certificate of Title After … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Once the moving party has made a prima facie case that entitles it to summary judgment, the burden shifts to the nonmoving party to produce specific facts that raise a genuine issue for trial.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
In re the Matter of the Petition of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of the Petition of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Once the moving party has made a prima facie case that entitles it to summary judgment, the burden shifts to the nonmoving party to produce specific facts that raise a genuine issue for trial.” review denied (Minn. Oct.