Cited by

Commitment of Ramey, rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

Commitment of Ramey, -68 (Minn. App. 2002) (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

Commitment of Ramey, (stating that courts may consider conduct not resulting in a criminal conviction), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

Commitment of Ramey, (“[T]he course of conduct need not consist solely of convictions but may also include conduct amounting to harmful sexual conduct, of which the offender was not convicted.”) , rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

Commitment of Ramey, rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

Commitment of Ramey , d 260, 268 (Minn. App. 2002), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

Commitment of Ramey , rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

Commitment of Ramey , (“[T]he course of conduct need not consist solely of convictions, but may also include conduct amounting to harmful sexual conduct, of which the offender was not convicted.”), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

Commitment of Ramey, (“[T]he course of conduct need not consist solely of convictions, but may also include conduct amounting to harmful sexual conduct, of which the offender was not convicted.”), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

Commitment of Ramey, (“The district court [has] the advantage of hearing the witnesses personally and judging their relative credibility.

Commitment of Ramey, 271 (Minn. App. 2002) (describing appellant’s offenses following incarceration and affirming appellant’s commitment as an SDP), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

Commitment of Ramey, (stating a “course of conduct” takes into account both conduct for which a person was convicted and conduct that did not result in a conviction), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

Commitment of Ramey, d 260, 270 (Minn. App. 2002), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

Commitment of Ramey , rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

27, 2013) ; see also In re Civil Commitment of Ramey , ( defining the term “course” as “a systematic or orderly succession; a sequence) .

Commitment of Ramey, (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

A “course of conduct” is defined by its ordinary meaning, which is a “systemic or orderly succession; a sequence.” In re Civil Commitment of Ramey , (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

A “course” means a “systemic or orderly succession; a sequence.” In re Civil Commitment of Ramey , (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.

(deferring to the district court’s role as fact-finder and assessor of witness credibility), review denied (Minn. Sept.

A “course of conduct” is defined by its ordinary meaning, which is a “systemic or orderly succession; a sequence.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.

A “cou rse of conduct” is defined by its ordinary meaning, which is a “systemic or orderly succes sion; a sequence.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.

In re Civil Commitment of Ramey , , 270 (Minn. App. 2002).

In re Civil Commitment of Ramey , review denied (Minn. Sept.

We review the record “in a light most favorable to the [judicial appeal panel’s] findings.” review denied (Minn. Sept.

review denied (Minn. Sept.

In re Linehan (Linehan IV), -76 (Minn. 11 1999); review denied (Minn. Sept.

See generally Lonergan, d at 641-42; -76 (Minn. 1999); -71 (Minn. App. 2002), review denied (Minn. Sept.

review denied 4 (Minn. Sept.

On appeal, we will not set aside the district court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous, and we view the record “in a light most favorable to the district court’s findings.”

(reiterating that SDP criteria may take into account convictions and other “conduct amounting to harmful sexual conduct”), review denied (Minn. Sept.

“The decision of whether to admit or exclude evidence is within the district court’s discretion and will be reversed only if the court has clearly abused its discretion.” review denied (Minn. Sept.

review denied (Minn. Sept.

(stating that court may consider conduct not resulting in conviction), review denied (Minn. Sept.