Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Welfare of J.L.Y., 596 N.W.2d 692.

21 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of: E.W.H., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
rev. granted (Minn. Sept.
In the Matter of the Welfare of: C. P. M., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
rev. granted (Minn. Sept.
In the Matter of the Welfare of: T. R. J., Jr., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
But a district court is not required to make particularized findings regarding its decision to “impose or withhold adjudication of delinquency.” rev. granted (Minn. Sept.
In the Matter of the Welfare of: Z. A. W., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
1 rev. granted (Minn. Sept.
In the Matter of the Welfare of: C. R. M., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
5 (Minn. App. 1999), review dismissed (Minn. Feb.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Esteban Trevino. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See, (reversing and remanding due to inadequate findings); -52 (Minn. App. 1987) (same).
In the Matter of the Welfare of: A. H. C., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
d 692, 695 (Minn. App. 1999), review granted (Minn. Sept.
In the Matter of the Welfare of: E. P. T., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review dismissed (Minn. Feb.
In the Matter of the Welfare of: Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review granted (Minn. Sept.
In the Matter of the Welfare of: N. J. S., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review granted (Minn. Sept.
In the Matter of the Welfare of: A. G., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review granted (Minn. Sept.
In the Matter of the Welfare of: B. A. H., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of: B. A. H., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review granted (Minn. Sept.
In Re the Welfare of E.S.C. 731 N.W.2d 149 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re the Welfare of E.S.C. 731 N.W.2d 149 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
(noting that the district court has wide discretion to select any disposition authorized by statute), review dismissed (Minn. Feb.
In Re the Welfare of R. V. 702 N.W.2d 294 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re the Welfare of R. V. 702 N.W.2d 294 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
(stating that despite “the administrative efficiency of [a pre-printed disposition] form and that in many cases the sound reasons for the disposition ordered are on the record [the incorporation of] the entire transcript into the [disposition] order does not satisfy the written-findings requiremen
In Re the Welfare of J.R.Z. 648 N.W.2d 241 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re the Welfare of J.R.Z. 648 N.W.2d 241 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
A district court “has broad discretion in determining whether to continue an adjudication in a delinquency proceeding.” (citing Minn.Stat.
In Re the Welfare of J.S.H.-G. 645 N.W.2d 500 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re the Welfare of J.S.H.-G. 645 N.W.2d 500 Minn. Ct. App. 2002