Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Gustafson, 610 N.W.2d 314.

119 citing documents.

Jeffrey Velt Murray v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See, (preserving appellant’s right to pursue ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim in postconviction proceedings when the claim could not be determined on trial record).
State of Minnesota v. Derrick John Thompson Minn. Ct. App. 2026
A postconviction hearing provides the court with additional facts to explain the attorney’s decisions, so as to properly consider whether a defense counsel’s performance was deficient.” (quotation and citations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Mark Andrew Huyber Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“Generally, an ineffective assistance of counsel claim should be raised in a postconviction petition for relief, rather than on direct appeal.”
State of Minnesota v. Terence Duane Maurstad Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“Generally, an ineffective assistance of counsel claim should be raised in a postconviction petition for relief, rather than on direct appeal.”
State of Minnesota v. Darrnell Maurice Samir Cooper Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Tamorris Mcquill Dempsey Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Alexander Lee Endres Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Raymond Boy Strong Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Gunnar Olson Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Andrew Joseph Casserly Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Andrew Joseph Casserly Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Abdusalam Omar Hussein Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Abdusalam Omar Hussein Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(“Therefore, while we decline to reach the merits of this issue, Gustafson’s right to pursue an ineffective assistance of counsel claim in a petition for postconviction relief is preserved.”).
Christopher Lee Konakowitz v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Christopher Lee Konakowitz v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of a reasonably competent attorney would perform under similar circumstances.” d 314, 320 (Minn. 2000) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Tyrel Traverse Ambuehl Minn. Ct. App. 2025
any conclusions reached by this court would be pure speculation.” (declining to reach appellant’s ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim but preserving appellant’s right to pursue it in a petition for postconviction relief).
State of Minnesota v. Steven Douglas Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Justin Lee Niesen Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Generally, an ineffective- assistance-of-counsel claim should be raised in a postconviction petition for relief, rather than on direct appeal.”
State of Minnesota v. Michael Drew Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Generally, an ineffective assistance of counsel claim should be raised in a postconviction petition for relief, rather than on direct appeal.”
State of Minnesota v. Samuel Morton Post, III Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Generally, an ineffective assistance of counsel claim should be raised in a postconviction petition for relief, rather than on direct appeal.” State v. Gustafson
State of Minnesota v. Larry Dusaun Gray Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(“Generally, an ineffective assistance of counsel claim should be raised in a postconviction petition for relief, rather than on direct appeal.”).
State of Minnesota v. Perry Karnell Coleman Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Generally, an ineffective assistance of counsel claim should be raised in a postconviction petition for relief, rather than on direct appeal.”
State of Minnesota v. Aaron Joseph Shea Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Generally, an ineffective assistance of counsel claim should be raised in a postconviction petition for relief, rather than on direct appeal.”
State of Minnesota v. Robert Kinte Dawon Battle Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Generally, an ineffective assistance of counsel claim should be raised in a postconviction petition for relief, rather than on direct appeal.” State v. Gustafson
State of Minnesota v. Kelly Jenko Triebwasser Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Carl Stanley Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Generally, an ineffective assistance of counsel claim should be raised in a postconviction petition for relief, rather than on direct appeal.” (“Because we cannot, on the record presented, determine whether Leake was denied effective assistance of counsel in connection with advice he received from his trial counsel about the consequences of rejecting a plea offer, we remand to th
State of Minnesota v. Shawn Dione Davenport Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Shawn Dione Davenport Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Generally, an ineffective assistance of counsel claim should be raised in a postconviction petition for relief, rather than on direct appeal.”
State of Minnesota v. Ali Ahmed Omar Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Ali Ahmed Omar Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In his brief to this court, Omar argues that “defense counsel never raised the affirmative defense of an alternative perpetrator to the jury in the trial proceedings.” “Generally, an ineffective assistance of counsel claim should be raised in a postconviction petition for relief, rather than on direct appeal.” d 314, 321 (Minn. 2000).
State of Minnesota v. Reginald Scott Hubbard Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Reginald Scott Hubbard Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Generally, an ineffective assistance of counsel claim should be raised in a postconviction petition for relief, rather than on direct appeal.”
State of Minnesota v. Reginald Scott Hubbard Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Reginald Scott Hubbard Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(preserving appellant’s right to pursue ineffective- assistance-of-counsel claim in a petition for postconviction relief when record on appeal is inadequate to resolve claim).
State of Minnesota v. Donald Dequai Crenshaw Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(“A postconviction hearing provides the court with additional facts to explain the attorney ’s decisions, so as to properly consider whether a defense counsel’s performance was deficient ”) (quotation omitted) .
State of Minnesota v. Michael Romeo Geraci Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“Generally, an ineffective assistance of counsel claim should be raised in a postconviction petition for relief, rather than on direct appeal.”
State of Minnesota v. Kenneth Darrick Robinson Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“Generally, an ineffective assistance of counsel claim should be raised in a postconviction petition for relief, rather than on direct appeal.”
State of Minnesota v. Saliou Kouyate Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. John Lee Littlejohn Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“Generally, an ineffective 5 assistance of counsel claim should be raised in a postconviction petiti on for relief, rather than on direct appeal.”
Thomas Robert Tichich v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
[that] a reasonably competent attorney would perform under similar circumstances.” d 314, 320 (Minn. 2000) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Roosevelt Bartu Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Trever Joseph Palodichuk Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Freddy Ivan Bau Rocano Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Generally, an ineffective assistance of counsel claim should be raised in a postconviction petition for relief, rather than on direct appeal.”
State of Minnesota vs Jason Peter Bird Minn. Ct. App. 2022
9 (providing that the district court “may at any time correct a sentence not authorized by law”); (declining to review claim of ineffective assistance of counsel due to insufficient record but preserving the issue for postconviction review).
State of Minnesota v. Dale Eugene McDonald Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Generally, an ineffective assistance of counsel claim should be raised in a postconviction petition for relief, rather than on direct appeal.” State v. Gustafson
State of Minnesota v. David Edward Campbell Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Dennis Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(declining to reach merits of claim on the grounds that the appellate record was insufficient for review).
State of Minnesota v. Patrick James Modtland Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Matthew James Preston Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Shawn Pierre Belland, II Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See State v. Gustafson , (affirming appellant’s conviction without prejudice to appellant’s right to raise claims in a postconviction proceeding).