Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. Norgaard v. Tahash, 110 N.W.2d 867.

138 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Ryan Timothy Kellen Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Luis Garcia Ortiz Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Juan Bustamante Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(providing that a defendant may plead guilty despite claiming a loss of memory through amne sia or intoxication).
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Joseph Trombley Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Elliott Lamar-Seccer Pierson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Michele Anne Reimann Minn. Ct. App. 2021
d 867 (Minn. 1961); (explaining that when the defendant pleads guilty with a Norgaard plea, “the record must establish that the evidence .
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Harold Specht Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Norgaard v. Tahash , based on his statement that he was intoxicated at the time of the incident .
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Dale Klitzke Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Dwayne Leckner Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Justin Marcus Rosendahl v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
d 867, 871 (Minn. 1961) (stating defendant ma y plead guilty yet maintain innocence on account of lack of memory).3 But our review of Raleigh, Nelson, and Nace, together with Ecker, Trott, and Lussier considered below, compels our conclusion that consideration of evidence not expressly acknowledged and ad mitted by the
State of Minnesota v. Jordan Lee Wachter Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Norgaard v. Tahash , -72 (Minn. 1961).
State of Minnesota v. Derek Lee Enderle Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Norgaard v. Tahash , d 867, 871 (Minn. 1961).
State of Minnesota v. Dean Robert Minnerath Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Norgaard v. Tahash , -72 (Minn. 1961).
State of Minnesota v. Abdifatah Abdullahi Hassan Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Justin Lee Brown Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Lawrence Raymond Burns Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Norgaard v. Tahash , - 72 (Minn. 1961) ( affirming district court ’s acceptance of guilty plea where defendant claimed loss of memory regarding circumstances of offense).
State of Minnesota v. Jared Phillip Renner Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Norgaard v. Tahash , -72 (Minn. 1961) (affirming guilty plea where defendant has no recollection of the events which resulted in his arrest)).
Berkeley Read Lewis v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. David Edward Williams, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. John Willard Greywind, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Hong Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Norgaard v. Tahash , 261 Minn. 106, 112 - 14, -72 (1961)).
State of Minnesota v. Yusef Abdi Ali Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Norgaard v. Tahash, 261 Minn. 106
State of Minnesota v. Scot William Yard Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Norgaard v. Tahash, 261 Minn. 106, ).
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Michael Means Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Norgaard v. Tahash, 261 Minn. 106
State of Minnesota v. Eugene Ryan Boos Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Norgaard v. Tahash , 261 Minn. 106
State of Minnesota v. Dwayne Alan Case Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Norgaard v. Tahash , 261 Minn. 106, 113 –14, ) to the sole count of second -degree murder and would face a prison sentence anywhere in the presumptive guidelines range of 295 to 415 months, at the district court’s discretion.
John Howard Bartz v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
John Howard Bartz v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Norgaard v. Tahash, 261 Minn. 106, 111-14, -72 (1961), allows a defendant to plead guilty even though he claims not to remember his alleged conduct.
State of Minnesota v. Ely Ovis Emmanuel Ana El Sabahot Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Gordon Ranniger Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Gordon Ranniger Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Norgaard v. Tahash, 261 Minn. 106
State of Minnesota v. Ely Ovis Emmanuel Ana El Sabahot Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Norgaard v. Tahash, 261 Minn. 106, 111-13, d 867, 871-72 (1961).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of Aaron Michael Hayes Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of Aaron Michael Hayes Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Norgaard v. Tahash, 261 Minn. 106, (affirming the district court’s acceptance of a guilty plea where the defendant asserted inability to remember the circumstances of the offense).
Jason Mark Musburger v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jason Mark Musburger v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Norgaard v. Tahash, 261 Minn. 106, (affirming the district court’s acceptance of a guilty plea where the defendant asserted inability to remember the circumstances of the offense).
State of Minnesota v. Jacob Miles Solberg 882 N.W.2d 618 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Jacob Miles Solberg 882 N.W.2d 618 Minn. 2016
Norgaard v. Tahash, 261 Minn. 106, 113-14
State of Minnesota v. Donald Kalib John Nichols Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Ricardo Kletschka Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Donald Kalib John Nichols Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Norgaard v. Tahash, 261 Minn. 106
State of Minnesota v. Ricardo Kletschka Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Norgaard v. Tahash, 261 Minn. 106
State of Minnesota v. John Porter Jackson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. John Porter Jackson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Norgaard v. Tahash, 261 Minn. 106, 111-12, ), review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota v. Elliott Lamar-Seccer Pierson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Elliott Lamar-Seccer Pierson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Norgaard v. Tahash, 261 Minn. 106
State of Minnesota v. Stanley Allen Brown, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Stanley Allen Brown, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Norgaard v. Tahash, 261 Minn. 106
State of Minnesota v. Corey Edward Fisherman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Corey Edward Fisherman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Norgaard v. Tahash, 261 Minn. 106