Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite RISK EX REL. MILLER v. Stark, 787 N.W.2d 690.

44 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Julie Karen Johnson v. Thomas Francis Johnson, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
n.1 (Minn. App. 2010) (noting that, in a marriage-dissolution case, the district court failed to account for $400 of value in an apparent “arithmetical or typographical error,” but because the difference was de minimis in the context of the proceeding, a remand was unnecessary), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Diana Jakubauskiene v. Robertas Jakubauskas Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In re the Marriage of: Towobola Abimbola Oladejo v. Olanrewaju Muideen Oladejo Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(quotation 13 omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Brent Lee Florine v. Lauren Marie Florine Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of: Rebecca Ann Pera Cole on behalf of Minor Child v. Zachary Cole Minn. Ct. App. 2024
n.1 (Minn. App. 2010) (refusing to grant appellate relief when any error was de minimis), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Tracie Kay Fowler v. Erwin James Fowler, III Minn. Ct. App. 2024
n.1 (Minn. App. 2010) (stating that a district court’s failure to account for $400 in value of land was a de minimis error), 17 rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Donald Floyd Deeble, Jr. v. Hayley Elizabeth Espelien Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Marriage of: Donald Floyd Deeble, Jr. v. Hayley Elizabeth Espelien Minn. Ct. App. 2023
n.1 (Minn. App. 2010) (declining relief for a de minimis error in valuation of land).
In re the Marriage of: Jerry Arthur McDonald v. Donna Arnela McDonald, n/k/a Donna Arnela Rosenblad Minn. Ct. App. 2023
n.1 (Minn. App. 2010), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Russell Vander Wiel v. Sharna Ann Wahlgren Minn. Ct. App. 2023
n.1 (Minn. App. 2010) (refusing to grant appellate relief when any error was de minimis), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: William T. Bienemann v. Yelena Y. Bienemann Minn. Ct. App. 2022
- 97 (Minn. App. 2010) (quotations and citations omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Jessica Elizabeth Solinsky, n/k/a Jessica Elizabeth Grimm v. Joseph Clark Solinsky Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(stating that “tracing property to its nonmarital source does not require intricate detail”), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
Willow Run Partners v. Scott D. Hillstrom, et al., Michael W. Haag, et al., Paul Chamberlain, et al., … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Miller v. Stark , 694 n.1 (Minn. App. 2010) (stating that district court’s failure to account for $400 in value of land worth $99,900 and with $54,900 in equity was de minimis error and declining to remand), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: John Alex Walker v. Laura Margaret Walker Minn. Ct. App. 2021
n.1 (Minn. App. 2010) (district court’s failure to account for $400 total in marital property), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Rupam Sinha v. Deepak Kademani Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Miller v. Stark , n.1 (Minn. App. 2010) (determi ning that an error was de minimis when the district court 19 inadvertently failed to address $400 when the land at issue was worth $99,900), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Melissa Leigh Brinkman, and Robert Michael Brinkman Minn. Ct. App. 2021
n.1, 694 (Minn. App. 2010).
In re the Marriage of: Andrew Lowe Billett v. RuthAnne Billett Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Miller v. Stark , n.1 (Minn. App. 2010) (s tating that a district court’s failure to account for $400 in value of land worth $99, 000 and with $54,900 in equity was a de minimis error and declining to remand), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Beth Marie Delzer v. Randy Edward Delzer Minn. Ct. App. 2020
n.1 (Minn. App. 2010) (refusing to remand for de minimis error in valuation of land).
In re the Marriage of: Donald William McIsaac v. Nadine S. Roberts Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(“[T]racing property to its nonmarital source does not require intricate detail.”), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Larry Allan Keeler v. Michelle Marie Keeler Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Miller v. Stark , n.1 (Minn. App. 2010 ) (concluding that error in the valuation of marital property was de minimis), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Lakmini Yamuna Herath v. Susantha Herath Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Miller v. Stark , (same), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Marie Wilson v. Todd Joseph Wilson Minn. Ct. App. 2019
n.1 (Minn. App. 2010) (citing Wibbens v. Wibbens , ) (holding that the district c ourt’s failure to account for what amounted to be approximately 0.5% of the total marital property was de minimis), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Beth Ann Bersaw v. Richard George Bersaw Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Jesse A. Freking v. Audra Jo Buxengard f/k/a Audra Jo Freking Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Miller v. Stark , 4 n.1 (Minn. App. 2010) (concluding that $400 missing from $29,500 marital appreciation was de mini mis error), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Sandra Kay Vogt v. Gary Dennis Vogt Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Miller v. Stark , 4 n.1 (Minn. App. 2010) (concluding that a $400 error in calcula tion by the district court was de minimis), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Patricia Rose Whipps v. Richard Cordell Whipps Minn. Ct. App. 2017
d 690, 697 (Minn. App. 2010) (“[T]racing property to its nonmarital source does not require intricate detail.”), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Alexander K. Antzaras v. Triantafilia Rose Moshou-Antzaras Minn. Ct. App. 2017
n.1 (Minn. App. 2010), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Matter of: Peter H. Stier v. Debra A. Peterson, n/k/a Debra A. Hershberger, County of … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Miller v. Stark , n.1 (Minn. App. 2010) (refusing to remand for de minimis error in property division), review denied (Minn. Nov.
Gill v. Gill 900 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Gill v. Gill 900 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(“[A] spouse may defeat the presumption by showing by a preponderance of the evidence that .the property acquired is nonmarital.” (quotation omitted)), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Jean Rucker v. Kraig Vernon Rucker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Jean Rucker v. Kraig Vernon Rucker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Odelia Castaneda Ortega v. Selwin Ortega Romero Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Odelia Castaneda Ortega v. Selwin Ortega Romero Minn. Ct. App. 2016
n.1 (Minn. App. 2010) (refusing to remand for a de minimis error in the property division in a dissolution judgment), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Alyssa Aileen Rex, f/k/a Alyssa Aileen Nicoski v. Steven Edward Nicoski Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Alyssa Aileen Rex, f/k/a Alyssa Aileen Nicoski v. Steven Edward Nicoski Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(affirming, as supported by the record, the district court’s implicit findings regarding a party’s alleged improper disposition of marital assets).
In re the Marriage of: Sharon Alice Gribble v. William Daniel Gribble Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Sharon Alice Gribble v. William Daniel Gribble Minn. Ct. App. 2015
n.1 (Minn. App. 2010) (declining to remand to correct $400 typographical error on valuation of $99,900 farm), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Kathryn R. Rauworth, n/k/a Kathryn R. Kendall v. Barry L. Rauworth Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Kathryn R. Rauworth, n/k/a Kathryn R. Kendall v. Barry L. Rauworth Minn. Ct. App. 2015
n.1 (Minn. App. 2010) (declining to remand for district court failure to account for $400 of value when classifying property), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Lynn Desiree Wallace v. Christopher Michael Wallace Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Lynn Desiree Wallace v. Christopher Michael Wallace Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. 4 Nov.
Butts ex rel. Iverson v. Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society 802 N.W.2d 839 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Butts ex rel. Iverson v. Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society 802 N.W.2d 839 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
(explaining that survival rule is “broadly inclusive”), 2 review denied (Minn. Nov.