Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Crump, 826 N.W.2d 838.

29 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Antonyo Esquire Lundy Minn. Ct. App. 2026
.” -42 (Minn. App. 2013) (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. May 21, 2013).
Ellis Scott Tooles, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
By contrast, collateral consequences “are civil and regulatory in nature.” d 838, 842 (Minn. App. 2013) (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. May 21, 2013).
Andrew Charles Patton, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
The defendant must understand the plea’s “direct consequences,” Raleigh, d at 96, which are those consequences that “flow definitely, immediately, and automatically from the guilty plea, ” (citation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. May 21, 2013).
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Michael Lewis Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Michael Lewis Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-42 (Minn. App. 2013), rev. denied (Minn. May 21, 2013).
In the Matter of the Welfare of: C. P. M., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A 12 collateral consequence—a consequence that does “not flow definitely, immediately, and automatically”—is “not punishment.” (), rev. denied (Minn. May 21, 2013).
Chad Alan Hoflock, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Direct consequences “flow definitely, immediately, and automatically from the guilty plea ” and usually include “the maximum sentence to be imposed and the amount of any fine.” -42 (Minn. App. 2013), rev. denied (Minn. May 21, 2013).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
rev. denied (Minn. May 21, 2013).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“[D]irect consequences are those which flow definitely, immediately, and automatically from the guilty plea .” - 42 (Minn. App. 2013) (citation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. May 21, 2013).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
rev. denied (Minn. May 21, 2013).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-43 (Minn. App. 2013) (holding that the possible effect that a plea may have upon a future charge is a collateral consequence that does not render the guilty plea unintelligent), rev. denied (Minn. May 21, 2013); (holding that the risk of becoming ineli
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
6 Crump, -42 (Minn. App. 2013) , rev. denied (Minn. May 21, 2013).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
rev. denied (Minn. May 21, 2013).
A20-1499 Minn. Ct. App. 2021
rev. denied (Minn. May 21, 2013).
Dylan Matthew Deling, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“Direct consequences are those wh ich flow definitely, immediately, and automatically from the guilty pl ea,” including “the maximum sentence to be imposed.” State v. Crump , -42 (Minn. App. 2013) (quotations omitted), rev. denied (Minn. May 21, 2013).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
As a result, and as part of the PSI, the Minnesota probation agent contacted a California probation agent who would be supervising appellant and who recommended many of the “special conditions.” 4 definitely, immediately, and automatically from the guilty plea—the maximum sentence and any fine to be imposed.” -42 (Minn. App. 20 13) (holding direct consequences “are those which flow definitely, immediately, and automatically from the guilty plea, such as the maximum sentence to be imposed and the
State of Minnesota, Respondent Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Direct consequences “are those which flow definitely, immediately, and automatically from the 5 guilty plea—the maximum sentence and any fine to be imposed.” , abrogated in part by Padilla v. Kentucky , 559 U.S. 356, 374, 130 S. Ct. 1473, 1486 (2010); -42 (Minn. App. 2013) (holding direct consequences “are those which flow definitely, immediately, and automatically from the guilty plea, such as the maximum sentence to be imposed and the amount of any fine” (quotation omitted)), review denied (Mi
State v. Brown 896 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Brown 896 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. May 21, 2013).
State of Minnesota v. Earl Lionell Ward Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Earl Lionell Ward Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Thus, if a defendant has been advised incorrectly about the sentence flowing from a plea, the plea may not be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.” review denied (Minn. May 21, 2013).
State of Minnesota v. Omar Taha Yaseen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Omar Taha Yaseen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Conversely, “collateral consequences ‘are not punishment’ but are ‘civil and regulatory in nature and are imposed in the interest of public safety.’” (-07 (Minn. 2002)), review denied (Minn. May 21, 2013).
State of Minnesota v. Earl Anthony Fry Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Earl Anthony Fry Minn. Ct. App. 2015
s that his guilty plea should have been withdrawn because he was distracted during the plea proceeding worrying about a missing portfolio and was not aware of what he was doing.2 But the fair-and-just standard does not allow a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea for any reason or without good reason because to do so would “‘undermine the integrity of the plea-taking process.’” Fry said that this portfolio contained his ideas for inventions and claimed that his attorney promised to secure its rel
State of Minnesota v. Mohammed Mohammed Ali Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Mohammed Mohammed Ali Minn. Ct. App. 2014
– 44 (Minn. App. 2013) (refusing to remand for further proceedings on a motion for plea withdrawal when the record was sufficient to permit review of the district court’s denial of the motion), review denied (Minn. May 21, 2013).
State of Minnesota v. La�Rog Daquan Meadows Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. La�Rog Daquan Meadows Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Rather, “[i]neligibility to possess a firearm is a collateral consequence of a conviction,” and “[g]enerally, collateral consequences ‘are not punishment’ but are ‘civil and regulatory in nature and are imposed in the interest of public safety,’” (– 07 (Minn. 2002)), review denied (Minn. May 21, 2013).