Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Johnson, 831 N.W.2d 917.

233 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota v. Stonii Jream Allen Minn. Ct. App. 2024
  • State of Minnesota v. Stonii Jream Allen Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    3 DECISION We will affirm a presumptive sentence if the record demonstrates that “the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
  • State of Minnesota v. Jesse James Niesen Minn. Ct. App. 2024
  • State of Minnesota v. Colleen Purificacion Larson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
  • State of Minnesota v. Shante Cheriece Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2024
  • State of Minnesota v. Jesse James Niesen Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    “Only the rare case will merit reversal based on the district court’s refusal to depart.” (), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
  • State of Minnesota v. Shante Cheriece Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    We will affirm a presumptive sentence when the record shows that the district court “carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
  • State of Minnesota v. Colleen Purificacion Larson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    (stating that, if the district court does not depart, the district court is not required to state reasons for imposing a presumptive sentence), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
  • State of Minnesota v. Kenneth Bernard Lax Minn. Ct. App. 2024
  • State of Minnesota v. Bryant Jerome Stephenson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
  • State of Minnesota v. Kenneth Bernard Lax Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    Appellate courts generally “affirm the imposition of a presumptive 6 guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
  • State of Minnesota v. Bryant Jerome Stephenson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    Nor is the district court “required to explain its reasons for imposing a presumptive sentence.” d 917, 925 (Minn. App. 2013), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
  • State of Minnesota v. Otis Redmond Ware Minn. Ct. App. 2024
  • State of Minnesota v. Otis Redmond Ware Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    “Only the rare case will merit reversal based on the district court’s refusal to depart.” 10 (Minn. App. 2013) (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
  • State of Minnesota v. Gavin Patrick Meany Minn. Ct. App. 2024
  • State of Minnesota v. Gavin Patrick Meany Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
  • State of Minnesota v. Jason Cole Hence Minn. Ct. App. 2024
  • State of Minnesota v. Jason Cole Hence Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
  • State of Minnesota v. Terrick Anthony Ruffin Minn. Ct. App. 2024
  • State of Minnesota v. Terrick Anthony Ruffin Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    “We will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
  • State of Minnesota v. Damon Marvin Henning, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
  • State of Minnesota v. Damon Marvin Henning, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    “We will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows [that] the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
  • State of Minnesota v. Joseph John Hall Minn. Ct. App. 2023
  • State of Minnesota v. Joseph John Hall Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    “We will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
  • State of Minnesota v. Torisa Sulvoris Wallace Minn. Ct. App. 2023
  • State of Minnesota v. Torisa Sulvoris Wallace Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    We will affirm a presumptive sentence if the record demonstrates that “the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    (stating that, if the district court “carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination,” the district court did not abuse its discretion (quotation omitted)), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    This court “will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the 17 testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    Accordingly, we will not disturb the district court’s exercise of discretion in imposing “a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” 2 Owens dedicates a substantial portion of his brief to arguing that his “particularly young age” supports departure, citing several cases from other jurisdictions.
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    “We will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    “We will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    We will not disturb the district court’s exercise of discretion in imposing “a p resumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    This court affirms “the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows [that] the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” , rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    We affirm the district court’s “imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows [that] the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” rev. denied 6 (Minn. Sept.
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    We will affirm a presumptive sentence if the record shows that “the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” d 917, 925 (Minn. App. 2013) (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
  • Dean Robert Hoversten, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    We will affirm a 7 presumptive sentence if the record shows that “the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    d 917, 925 (Minn. App. 2013) (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    “We will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    “We will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    31, 2009); (“The district court is not required to explain its reasons for imposing a presumptive sentence.”).
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
  • Xanth Tyler Wilkins, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    “We will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
    rev. denied (Minn. Sept.