Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Johnson, 831 N.W.2d 917.
- State of Minnesota v. Stonii Jream Allen Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Stonii Jream Allen
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
3 DECISION We will affirm a presumptive sentence if the record demonstrates that “the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
- State of Minnesota v. Jesse James Niesen Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Colleen Purificacion Larson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Shante Cheriece Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Jesse James Niesen
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Only the rare case will merit reversal based on the district court’s refusal to depart.” (), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
-
State of Minnesota v. Shante Cheriece Davis
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
We will affirm a presumptive sentence when the record shows that the district court “carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
-
State of Minnesota v. Colleen Purificacion Larson
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(stating that, if the district court does not depart, the district court is not required to state reasons for imposing a presumptive sentence), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
- State of Minnesota v. Kenneth Bernard Lax Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Bryant Jerome Stephenson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Kenneth Bernard Lax
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Appellate courts generally “affirm the imposition of a presumptive 6 guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
-
State of Minnesota v. Bryant Jerome Stephenson
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Nor is the district court “required to explain its reasons for imposing a presumptive sentence.” d 917, 925 (Minn. App. 2013), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
- State of Minnesota v. Otis Redmond Ware Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Otis Redmond Ware
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Only the rare case will merit reversal based on the district court’s refusal to depart.” 10 (Minn. App. 2013) (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
- State of Minnesota v. Gavin Patrick Meany Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Gavin Patrick Meany
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
- State of Minnesota v. Jason Cole Hence Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Jason Cole Hence
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
- State of Minnesota v. Terrick Anthony Ruffin Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Terrick Anthony Ruffin
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“We will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
- State of Minnesota v. Damon Marvin Henning, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-
State of Minnesota v. Damon Marvin Henning, Jr.
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows [that] the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
- State of Minnesota v. Joseph John Hall Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-
State of Minnesota v. Joseph John Hall
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
- State of Minnesota v. Torisa Sulvoris Wallace Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-
State of Minnesota v. Torisa Sulvoris Wallace
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
We will affirm a presumptive sentence if the record demonstrates that “the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(stating that, if the district court “carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination,” the district court did not abuse its discretion (quotation omitted)), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs.
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
This court “will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the 17 testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Accordingly, we will not disturb the district court’s exercise of discretion in imposing “a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” 2 Owens dedicates a substantial portion of his brief to arguing that his “particularly young age” supports departure, citing several cases from other jurisdictions.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
We will not disturb the district court’s exercise of discretion in imposing “a p resumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
This court affirms “the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows [that] the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” , rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
We affirm the district court’s “imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows [that] the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” rev. denied 6 (Minn. Sept.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
We will affirm a presumptive sentence if the record shows that “the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” d 917, 925 (Minn. App. 2013) (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
-
Dean Robert Hoversten, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
We will affirm a 7 presumptive sentence if the record shows that “the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
d 917, 925 (Minn. App. 2013) (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
31, 2009); (“The district court is not required to explain its reasons for imposing a presumptive sentence.”).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
-
Xanth Tyler Wilkins, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.