Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Johnson, 831 N.W.2d 917.

235 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Marvel Galvaston Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Marvel Galvaston Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2024
And we will affirm the decision to impose the presumptive sentence when “the record shows that the [district] court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Stonii Jream Allen Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Stonii Jream Allen Minn. Ct. App. 2024
3 DECISION We will affirm a presumptive sentence if the record demonstrates that “the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Jesse James Niesen Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Colleen Purificacion Larson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Shante Cheriece Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Jesse James Niesen Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Only the rare case will merit reversal based on the district court’s refusal to depart.” (), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Shante Cheriece Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2024
We will affirm a presumptive sentence when the record shows that the district court “carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Colleen Purificacion Larson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(stating that, if the district court does not depart, the district court is not required to state reasons for imposing a presumptive sentence), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Kenneth Bernard Lax Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Bryant Jerome Stephenson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Kenneth Bernard Lax Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Appellate courts generally “affirm the imposition of a presumptive 6 guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Bryant Jerome Stephenson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Nor is the district court “required to explain its reasons for imposing a presumptive sentence.” d 917, 925 (Minn. App. 2013), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Otis Redmond Ware Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Otis Redmond Ware Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Only the rare case will merit reversal based on the district court’s refusal to depart.” 10 (Minn. App. 2013) (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Gavin Patrick Meany Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Gavin Patrick Meany Minn. Ct. App. 2024
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Jason Cole Hence Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Jason Cole Hence Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Terrick Anthony Ruffin Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Terrick Anthony Ruffin Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“We will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Jessica Ann Kong Minn. Ct. App. 2023
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Damon Marvin Henning, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Damon Marvin Henning, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows [that] the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Joseph John Hall Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Joseph John Hall Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Torisa Sulvoris Wallace Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Torisa Sulvoris Wallace Minn. Ct. App. 2023
We will affirm a presumptive sentence if the record demonstrates that “the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. John Paul Raymond Bye Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(stating that, if the district court “carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination,” the district court did not abuse its discretion (quotation omitted)), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Weston Marshal Voeltz Minn. Ct. App. 2023
This court “will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the 17 testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Marcus Allen Owens, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Accordingly, we will not disturb the district court’s exercise of discretion in imposing “a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” 2 Owens dedicates a substantial portion of his brief to arguing that his “particularly young age” supports departure, citing several cases from other jurisdictions.
State of Minnesota v. Michael Paul Kuklok Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Nathan Edward Garrett Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. George Jerry Matlock Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Cha NMN Yang Minn. Ct. App. 2023
We will not disturb the district court’s exercise of discretion in imposing “a p resumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Brandon John Schmidt Minn. Ct. App. 2023
This court affirms “the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows [that] the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” , rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Todd Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2023
We affirm the district court’s “imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows [that] the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” rev. denied 6 (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Robert Allen Mrozek Minn. Ct. App. 2023
We will affirm a presumptive sentence if the record shows that “the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” d 917, 925 (Minn. App. 2013) (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
Dean Robert Hoversten v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
We will affirm a 7 presumptive sentence if the record shows that “the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Shevirio Kavirion Childs -Young Minn. Ct. App. 2023
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Moosisaa Dhugumaa Bulchaa Minn. Ct. App. 2023
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Jose Alejandro Mejia-Bonilla Minn. Ct. App. 2023
d 917, 925 (Minn. App. 2013) (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Julian Leon Hooks Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Allison Wesley Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Peter Jay Engen Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Samuel Lee Griffith Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Tashawn Antionette Thomas Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Dejahn Akeem Wiley-Hunt Minn. Ct. App. 2023
31, 2009); (“The district court is not required to explain its reasons for imposing a presumptive sentence.”).
State of Minnesota v. Jared Devlin Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.