Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Johnson, 831 N.W.2d 917.

235 citing documents.

Xanth Tyler Wilkins v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Kristi Dannette Mcneilly Minn. Ct. App. 2022
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Jonathon Charles Kalvoda Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“We will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows [that] the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (alteration in original), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Jason Michael Slattum Minn. Ct. App. 2022
We will affirm the decision not to depart and the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when “the record shows that the [district] court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Braxton Monte Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2022
A “ district court is not required to explain its reasons for imposing a 6 presumptive sentence.”
State of Minnesota v. Abraham Palma Hernandez Minn. Ct. App. 2022
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. William Clyde Grunwald Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“We will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Cree James Diver Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State v. Johnson , (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Lejuan Walter Hyde Minn. Ct. App. 2022
- 26 (Minn. App. 2013) .
State of Minnesota v. John Edward Juneau Minn. Ct. App. 2022
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Orlando Omar Castillo Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Thomas Jacob Nohner Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“We will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guideline s sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted ), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
Lannon Lavar Burdunice v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2022
And be cause a district court need not explain its reasons for imposing a presumptive sentence, State v. Johnson , we similarly see no merit in Burdunice’s contenti on that the district court abused its discretion by ignoring arguments he made at sentencing.
State of Minnesota v. Edward David Stahlmann Minn. Ct. App. 2022
4 making a determination.” State v. Johnson , (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Isaac Alonzo Cryer Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In sum, “[w]e will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sep t. 17, 2013).
State of Minnesota v. Braxton Monte Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Michele Anne Reimann Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(explaining no abuse of discretion generally occurs when the district court carefully considers informati on in the record befo re imposing a guideline sentence), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Dwayne Leckner Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Generally, a district court “ is not required to explain its reasons for imposing a presumptive sentence.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Pierce Gerald Heston Minn. Ct. App. 2021
review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Kenneth Freeland Jami Morrow, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Ronny Ray Oleson Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State v. Pegel , -55 (Minn. App. 2011); (“ We will affirm the imposition of a presum ptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted)), review denied 7 (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Stephen Joseph Melius Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Terrell Reese Schaeffer Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State v. Johnson , review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Chad Michael Gibson Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Kangbateh, d at 14; Kindem, d at 7 ; d 917, 925 (Minn. App. 2013), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Eduardo Delariva-Larios Minn. Ct. App. 2020
And we will affirm the imposition of a presumptive sentence when, as here, “ the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Christy Lynn Tjaden Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“We will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when ‘the 5 record shows [that] the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.’” State v. Johnson , d 917, 925 (Minn. App. 2013) (alteration in original) (quoting State v. Van Ruler , ), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Cameron Pierre Richmond, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Michael Loving Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Robert Alonzo Richardson Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State 15 v. Johnson , review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Terrell Hemphill Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Anthony Cruz Hernandez Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey George Ackerson, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See State v. Johnson , (stating that the sentencing court does not abuse its discretion so long as it considers all the evidence presented before imposing a sentence) review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Johnny Clifton Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Tony Le Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Lawrence Frank Herron Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Even if a defendant is particularly amenable to probation, a district court need not depart, -65 (Minn. App. 2009), and it need not provide reasons for imposing a presumptive sentence, State v. Johnson , review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Trent Theodore Horning Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Karla Jean Winterfeld Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Johnson , review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Aaron Duviaze Taylor Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Varlyn Sharp Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Oscar Armando Vargas Minn. Ct. App. 2019
information presented before making a determination.” -81 (Minn. App. 1985); (stating we will generally affirm presumptive sentence when the record shows that district court evaluated the circumstances), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Justin Lee Brown Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Johnson , review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Ali Joshua Jalil Robida Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“We will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when ‘the record shows [that] the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.’” (alteration in original) (quoting State v. Van Ruler , ), review 7 denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Stevevontae Dellshawn Champion Minn. Ct. App. 2019
When a district court sentences within the presumptive range, it is not required to “ explain its reasons for imposing a presumptive sentence.” State v. Johnson , review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Monroe Leshawn Harrell Minn. Ct. App. 2019
osing a presumptive sentence so long as it considers the proposed reasons for departure, and we may not interfere wit h the district court ’s exercise of discretion so long as “the record shows the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” State v. Van Ruler , d 77, 80-81 (Minn. App. 1985); (“[T]he district court is not required to explain its reasons for imposing a presumptive sentence.”), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Ricky Thomas Cobb Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Ramiro Alejandro Pena Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Johnson , review denied ( M i n n .
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Scott David Auginaush Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Johnson Bankole Oluwalowo Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“A district court must impose the presumptive guidelines sentence absent identifiable, substantial, and compelling circumstances justify ing departure.” State v. 4 Johnson, (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Scott David Quall Minn. Ct. App. 2019
And a “district court is not required to explain its reasons for imposing a presumptive sentence.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Gordon Jerome Walker Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A “search” occurs “upon an official’s invasion of a person’s reasonable expectation of privacy.” review denied (Sept.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by