Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Curtis, 921 N.W.2d 342.

90 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Terry Allen Stewart Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Paul Andrew Youngstedt Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(stating that the court of appeals is requi red to follow supreme court precedent).
State of Minnesota v. Roosevelt Vinson Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(noting that the court of appeals is bound by supreme court precedent).
State of Minnesota v. Roosevelt Montgomery Minn. Ct. App. 2020
N.H., and Rebecca Lucero, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights-intervenor v. Anoka-Hennepin School District No. 11 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
We are therefore bound to apply it.5
State of Minnesota v. Boyd Jerome Morson, II Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Nicks, d at 506; d 342, 346 (Minn. 2018) (“The court of appeals is bound by supreme court precedent.”).
State of Minnesota v. Antonio Deshaun Collins Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(noting that we are “bound by supreme court precedent”).
In re the Matter of Kenneth Alan Hovland, OBO Minor Children v. Ryan Richard Jazdzewski Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State v. Curtis , (“The court of appeals is bound by supreme court precedent .
State of Minnesota v. Jude Thomas Mary O’Neill Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Pate v. Robinson , 383 U.S. 375, 378, 86 S. Ct. 836, 838 (1966); State v. Curtis
Followed Bunrerth Mao v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Whitney Hinrichs-Cady v. Hennepin County Minn. Ct. App. 2020
We do not by our holding here, or by noting Judge Alsop’s concern expressed in Pierce, question the viability of the supreme court’s Williams holding
State of Minnesota v. Dustin Lee Redwine Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. William Cleveland Alan Boykin Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Minn. Const. art. VI, § 2 (identifying this court’s appellate jurisdiction over “all courts, except the supreme court, and other appellate jurisdiction as prescribed by law”); (“The court of appeals is bound by supreme court precedent, as it has repeatedly acknowledged.”).
Followed State of Minnesota v. Jesse Lee Bonacci-Koski Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(“The court of appeals is bound by supreme court precedent .
Simon Duku Boateng v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(“The court of appeals is bound by supreme court precedent .
Overruled Sonny Syhavong v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
d 342, 346 (Minn. 2018).
Timothy Wodarck v. Lakota Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(“The court of appeals is bound by supreme court precedent .
State of Minnesota v. Charlene Marie Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2019
d 342, 346 (Minn. 2018) (“The court of appeals is bound by supreme court precedent.”).
State of Minnesota v. Michael Anthony Casillas Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(holding that “[t]he court of appeals is bound by supreme court precedent”).
State of Minnesota v. James Warren Northrup Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Because this court is bound to follow supreme court precedent, we conclude that the district court did not err when it denied Northrup’s motion to dismiss the charges against him.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Christopher Scott Malz Minn. Ct. App. 2019
This court “is bound by supreme court precedent.” State v. Curtis
Followed State of Minnesota v. Jason Elliot Peterson Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See State v. Curtis , (“The court of appeals is bound by supreme court precedent, as it has repeatedly acknowledged.”).
State of Minnesota v. Justin Joseph Huisman Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Minn. Const. art. VI, § 2 (identifying this court’s appellate jurisdiction “over all courts, except the supreme court, and all other appellate jurisdiction as proscribed by law”); (“The court of appeals is bound by supreme court precedent, as it has repeatedly acknowledged.”); d 763, 767 (Minn. App. 2010), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Antonio Rashod Baker Minn. Ct. App. 2019
This court is “bound by supreme court precedent.”
Followed State of Minnesota v. Lee Vang Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Nevertheless, Harris reaffirms Minnesota’s two -step appellate review of convictions that rest solely on circumstantial evidence, d at 600, and we are bound by the law as established by the Minnesota Supreme Court, (“The court of appeals is bound by supreme court precedent.”).
State of Minnesota v. Lannon Lavar Burdunice Minn. Ct. App. 2019
9 See State v. Curtis , (noting that court of appeals “is bound by supreme court precedent”).
Pamela Maslowski v. Prospect Funding Partners LLC, et al., and Prospect Funding Holdings (NY) LLC and third-party plaintiff, … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(“The court of appeals is bound by supreme court precedent .
Followed Dewey Hill III Townhomes Association, Inc. v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2019
But the Minnesota Supreme Court has made it abundantly clear that we are bound by its decisions, d 342, 343 (Minn. 2018), and Auto-Owners’ argument here is a naked invitation to disregard the supreme court’s holding in Poehler.
Al Dressely, et al v. CAL Properties, LLC, d/b/a Inver Grove Auto Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Keenon Lamar Bowlds Minn. Ct. App. 2019
This court “is bound by supreme court precedent.” State v. Curtis , 6 (Minn. 2018); see also State v. M.L.A.
State of Minnesota v. Minnesota School of Business, Inc. d/b/a Minnesota School of Business, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Followed State of Minnesota v. Antoine Kenneth James Adkins Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(“ The court of appeals is bound by supreme court precedent .
Followed State of Minnesota v. Rashad Ramon Ivy Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Brendon Scott Vagle Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“The court of appeals is bound by supreme court precedent.”
State of Minnesota v. Jared Phillip Renner Minn. Ct. App. 2019
And we are “bound by supreme court precedent.” State v. Curtis
State of Minnesota v. David Alan Nielsen Minn. Ct. App. 2019
And “[t]he court of appeals is bound by supreme court precedent.” d 342, 342 (Minn. 2018).
Bedeau v. Evans 926 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Bedeau v. Evans 926 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See State v. Curtis , , 342 (Minn. 2018) ("The court of appeals is bound by supreme court precedent.").
Oluf Johnson, et al v. Consumers Cooperative Association of Litchfield Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(holding that the Minnesota Court of Appeals is bound by Minnesota Supreme Court precedent).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Charles Richard Stone Minn. Ct. App. 2019
15, 2013) ; State v. Curtis , (holding court of appeals is bound by supreme court precedent) .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by