Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., 644 N.W.2d 72.

555 citing documents.

Wells Fargo Bank, NA, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
James W. Honcik, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Richard Preston Blackwell, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., d 72, 76-77 (Minn. 2002).
Peter Richard Rickmyer, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Appellate courts “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted .” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Michael L Reger, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Mark LaVigne v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company Minn. Ct. App. 2026
tory minimum and a statutory right” to “payment of all line items awarded in appraisal, unless the loss is specifically excluded in the policy.” On review of the district court’s grant of summary judgment, we determine “whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., d 72, 76 (Minn. 2002).
Birkholz & Associates, LLC., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Michelle VanDyke, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
DECISION In an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, appellate courts review “whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
Kristin Harner, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Minnesota Coalition on Government Information, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002) (noting that “[w]e view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted”).
Brandon Knowles, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Han Zhong v. Nicholas Dudero, Stieg Strand Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Han Zhong v. Nicholas Dudero, Stieg Strand Minn. Ct. App. 2026
We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002) (citations omitted).
Richard Joseph Terfehr v. Buffalo-Red River Watershed District, Wilkin ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Richard Joseph Terfehr v. Buffalo-Red River Watershed District, Wilkin ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
John Donahue, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In reviewing the district court’s summary-judgment decision, we “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Tory Brent Apps v. Jesse Stowers Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Tory Brent Apps v. Jesse Stowers Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STARS Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
ROA Rochester, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002) (citations omitted).
City of Oakdale, Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
P. 56.01; STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., –77 (Minn. 2002).
William Warner, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In conducting the review, appellate courts “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Magnifi Financial Credit Union, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Appellate courts review de novo “whether a genuine issue of material fact exists” and “whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
Linda A. Trampusch v. Truck Insurance Exchange Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Linda A. Trampusch v. Truck Insurance Exchange Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Abdikafi Fowzi Abdi, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P, -77 (Minn. 2002).
Daniel Francis Link, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., –77 (Minn. 2002).
Jacob Pries, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., –77 (Minn. 2002).
A25-0090 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
A24-1910 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
Jerry Lynn Schmidt, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., - 77 (Minn. 2002) (stating that on appeal from summary judgment, appellate courts view the facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party).
Life Time, Inc. v. Zurich American Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Life Time, Inc. v. Zurich American Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In considering these arguments on appeal from a grant of summary judgment, this court reviews “whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
Troy Olds, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Cheryl M. Shega, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Great North Capital Consultants, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
6 Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
In the Matter of the Application of Janet T. Lamkin, to Register the Title to Certain Land. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002) (noting that appellate courts “ view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted”).
Discover Bank, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Further, appellate courts “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002) (citations omitted).
Rick Stevens, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
This court reviews de novo whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and “whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., d 72, 76-77 (Minn. 2002).
Daniel W Crandall, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
When considering the record on summary judgment, appellate courts “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., - 77 (Minn. 2002).
Anshuman Bhatia, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In doing so, appellate courts “ view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Terry Colton, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Sylvester L. Zurn, individually and as beneficiary of the Sylvester L. Zurn Trust, dated December 30, 2002, et … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Michelin Properties LLC, Plaintiff, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P ., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Petition of Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for an Order Directing Entry of New Certificate of Title After Mortgage … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Additionally, 6 appellate courts “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002) (citations omitted).
Troy K Scheffler, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, appellate courts “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Christopher Villella, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Joseph J. Walters, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
This court reviews de novo whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and “whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
CSM Bonaventure Limited Partnership, L.L.L.P., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.