Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., 644 N.W.2d 72.

558 citing documents.

Sylvester L Zurn, individually and as beneficiary of the Sylvester L. Zurn Trust, dtd December 30, 2002, et … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“On appeal from summary judgment, we review whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
Joseph T. Green v. State National Insurance Company, Inc., et al Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Life Fitness, LLC v. Anthony S. Dahmen, Bruce Banker Minn. Ct. App. 2026
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Dragomir Penchev Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
James W. Honcik v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Richard Preston Blackwell v. Cub Foods, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2026
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., d 72, 76-77 (Minn. 2002).
Peter Richard Rickmyer v. City of Minneapolis, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Appellate courts “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted .” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Michael L Reger v. Edward B. Magarian, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Mark LaVigne v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company Minn. Ct. App. 2026
tory minimum and a statutory right” to “payment of all line items awarded in appraisal, unless the loss is specifically excluded in the policy.” On review of the district court’s grant of summary judgment, we determine “whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., d 72, 76 (Minn. 2002).
Birkholz & Associates, LLC. v. Zachary James Lyons Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Michelle VanDyke, et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company Minn. Ct. App. 2026
DECISION In an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, appellate courts review “whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
Kristin Harner, et al v. FBL Financial Services, Inc., et al., Guy J Dawson Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Minnesota Coalition on Government Information v. City of Minneapolis, et al., Police Officers’ Federation of Minneapolis Minn. Ct. App. 2026
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002) (noting that “[w]e view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted”).
Brandon Knowles v. Bradley Larry Knowles Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Han Zhong v. Nicholas Dudero, et al., Stieg Strand, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Han Zhong v. Nicholas Dudero, et al., Stieg Strand, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2026
We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002) (citations omitted).
A25-0881 Richard Joseph Terfehr, et al v. Buffalo-Red River Watershed District, et al., Wilkin County Soil & Water … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
A25-0881 Richard Joseph Terfehr, et al v. Buffalo-Red River Watershed District, et al., Wilkin County Soil & Water … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
John Donahue v. Robert Donahue, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In reviewing the district court’s summary-judgment decision, we “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Tory Brent Apps, et al v. Jesse Stowers Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Tory Brent Apps, et al v. Jesse Stowers Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STARS Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
ROA Rochester, LLC v. City of Rochester Minn. Ct. App. 2026
We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002) (citations omitted).
City of Oakdale, Minnesota v. Oakdale Marketplace, LLC, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2026
P. 56.01; STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., –77 (Minn. 2002).
William Warner, et al v. Pines of North Oaks Home Owners’ Association, Inc., North Oaks Home Owners’ Association, … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In conducting the review, appellate courts “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Magnifi Financial Credit Union v. Harriet Lewis, The Patio Park Association, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Appellate courts review de novo “whether a genuine issue of material fact exists” and “whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
Linda A. Trampusch v. Truck Insurance Exchange Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Linda A. Trampusch v. Truck Insurance Exchange Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Abdikafi Fowzi Abdi v. John Norman Melchior Minn. Ct. App. 2025
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P, -77 (Minn. 2002).
Daniel Francis Link v. Jeffrey Hidde, et al., Itasca Driftskippers Snowmobile Club, Inc., Personnel Dynamics, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2025
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., –77 (Minn. 2002).
Jacob Pries v. Whitewater Dairy, LLC, et al., vs. Bruce Kreofsky & Sons, Inc., a/k/a Great River Overhead … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., –77 (Minn. 2002).
Kimberly Lowry, on behalf of herself and the Proposed Rule 23 Classes, et al. (A24-0849) (A24-1910) v. City … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
Jaguar Communications, LLC (A25-0090) v. Daniel Petsinger (A25-0025) Minn. Ct. App. 2025
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Jerry Lynn Schmidt v. James Ernest Grotluschen, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., - 77 (Minn. 2002) (stating that on appeal from summary judgment, appellate courts view the facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party).
Life Time, Inc., et al v. Zurich American Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Life Time, Inc., et al v. Zurich American Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In considering these arguments on appeal from a grant of summary judgment, this court reviews “whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
Troy Olds v. City of Moorhead Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Cheryl M. Shega v. American Bank of the North, et al., Laura Craig, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2025
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Great North Capital Consultants, Inc. v. Maciek G. Kaminski, et al., Kylie E. Kaminski Minn. Ct. App. 2025
6 Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
In the Matter of the Application of Janet T. Lamkin, to Register the Title to Certain Land Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002) (noting that appellate courts “ view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted”).
Discover Bank v. Leon M Wiechmann Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Further, appellate courts “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002) (citations omitted).
Rick Stevens v. State Bank of Bellingham Minn. Ct. App. 2025
This court reviews de novo whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and “whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC v. Ari D Clark Minn. Ct. App. 2025
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., d 72, 76-77 (Minn. 2002).
Daniel W Crandall, et al v. James E Hanson Minn. Ct. App. 2025
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company v. Bradshaw & Bryant Law Office PLLC Minn. Ct. App. 2025
When considering the record on summary judgment, appellate courts “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., - 77 (Minn. 2002).
Anshuman Bhatia, et al v. Joseph Anderson, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In doing so, appellate courts “ view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Terry Colton, et al v. Gary A. Meemken, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2025
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Sylvester L. Zurn, individually and as beneficiary of the Sylvester L. Zurn Trust, dated December 30, 2002, et … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Michelin Properties LLC, Clean Care LLC v. Jacobson Environmental, PLLC, et al., City & County Credit Union Minn. Ct. App. 2025
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P ., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Petition of Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for an Order Directing Entry of New Certificate of Title After Mortgage … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Additionally, 6 appellate courts “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002) (citations omitted).
Troy K Scheffler v. Costco Wholesale Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, appellate courts “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by