Cited by

Exceptional circumstances are “those that affect a court-appointed attorney’s ability or competence to represent the client.”

A circumstance is exceptional only when it affects counsel’s “ability or competence to represent the client.”

If a court excludes a defendant for disruptive behavior, it need not “continually” invite them back or otherwise seek to determine if they are “ready to behave.”

Although the supreme court has stated that, in certain circumstances, disagreements over trial strategy could affect an appointed attorney’s ability or competence to represent a defendant, -50 (Minn. 2001), Hunt does not argue that counsel’s refusal to file the motions that he requested suggested inability or incompetence on the part of his public defender.

Exceptional circumstances are those circumstances that impact an “attorney’s ability or competence to represent the [defendant].”

But this right does not give an indigent defendant “the unbridled right to be represented by counsel of his own choosing.” (quotation omitted).

Exceptional circumstances refer to the appointed counsel’s “ability or competence to represent the client.”

“A defendant’s constitutional right to be present [at trial] is grounded in the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”

d 440, 450 (Minn. 2001).

Exceptional circumstances are those that affect counsel’s “ability or competence to represent the client.”

Exceptional circumstances are those that affect appointed counsel ’s “ability or competence to represent the client.”

Exceptional circumstances are those that affect appointe d counsel’s “ability or competence to represent the client.”

However, the right to court-appointed “counsel does not give [a de fendant] the unbridled right to be represented by coun sel of [their] own choosing.” d 440, 449 (Minn. 2001) (quotatio n omitted).

Exceptional circumstances that warrant the appointment of substitute counsel are “those that affect a court-appointed attorney’s ability or competence to represent the client.”

A person’s right to “counsel does not give [them] the unbridled right to be represented by counsel of [their] own choosing.”

“[E]xceptional circumstances are those that affect a court -appointed attorney’s ability or competence to represent the client.” State v. Gillam

(permitting a jury to “infer that a person intends the natural and probable consequences of his actions” (quotation omitted)); see also Nelson, d at 861 (stating that “before a plea of guilty can be accepted, the trial judge must make certain that facts exist from which the defendant’s gu

( stating that jury “may infer that a person intends the natural and probable consequences of his actions”) .

ttorney because he “believed his 10 attorney was unprepared to represent him, while defense counsel expressed frustration that [Urban] was too involved and filing his own motions.” But, without more, Ur ban’s dissatisfaction with his attorney does not present good cause to terminate him; to do so, he must demonstrate that his attorney lacked “ability and competence.” See State v. Gillam

See Worthy, d at 278; (“[T]he right of an indigent to have counsel does not give him the unbridled right to be represented by counsel of his own choosing.” (quotation omitted)).

“[E]xceptional circumstances ar e t h o s e t h a t a f f e c t a c o u r t - a p p ointed attorney’s ability or competence to represent the client.”

State v. Gillam , d 440, 449 (Minn. 2001).

d 440, 449 (Minn. 2001) .

Excep tional circumstances “are those that affect a court-appointed attorney’s ability or competence to represent the client.”

“[E]xceptional circumstances are those that affect a court - appointed attorney’s ability or competence to represent the client.”

The “exceptional circumstances” that necessitate appointment of substitute counsel are those that “affect a court-appointed attorney’s ability or competence to represent the client.”

“Exceptional circumstances” warranting substitution of counsel “are those that affect a court-appointed attorney’s ability or competence to represent the client.”

“[E]xceptional circumstances are those that affect a court-appointed attorney’s ability or competence to represent the client.”

Exceptional circumstances are those that “affect a court-appointed attorney’s ability or competence to represent the client.”

“[E]xceptional circumstances are those that affect a court-appointed attorney’s ability or competence to represent the client.”

“[E]xceptional circumstances are those that affect a court-appointed attorney’s ability or competence to represent the client.”