Cited by

-83 (Minn. 1988) (“An appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal, and may not consider matters not produced and received in evidence below.”).

This court is “bound to the trial court record.” -83 (Minn. 1988).

-83 (Minn. 1988) (“An appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal.”); Minn. R. Civ.

“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented [to] and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted).

See Thiele v. Stich , (“Actual notice will not subject defendants to personal jurisdiction absent substantial compliance with [Minn. R. Civ.

v. Anda, (explaining that, generally, issues not raised or argued in appellant’s principal brief cannot be raised in a reply brief); (stating that appellate courts generally address only those questions previously presented to and considered by the district court).

And a party may not “obtain review by raising the same general issue litigated below but under a different theory.” (holding that plaintiffs could not raise a new negligence theory of recovery on appeal).

“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented [to] and considered by the [decision-maker] in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted); (discussing this forfeiture analysis in right to be determined after an agency hearing”), .63 (authorizing certiorari appeal from a final decision in a contested case), 127A.41, subd.

(stating that appellate courts do not address questions not previously presented to and considered by the district court).

Generally, “[a] party may not ‘obtain review by raising the same general issue litigated below but under a different theory.’” n.2 (Minn. 2015 ().

a short period of time to respond to the Complaint in Intervention.” Generally, this court only considers issues that “were presented and considered by the trial court.”

“It is a well-settled principle that issues not presented at trial cannot be raised on appeal.” n.2 (Minn. 1979) (citations omitted); (this court may consider only issues that the record shows were presented to and considered by the district court; a party may not obtain review by raising the same general issue under a different theory).

Thiele v. Stich , (“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented [to] and considered by the trial court in dec iding the matter before it.”) 10 III.

(stating that appellate courts generally address only those questions previously presented to and considered by the district court); Ganguli v. Univ.

(“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted)).

See Thiele v. Stich , (noting that appellate court generally will not consider matters not argued to and considered by the district court).

of Coats, (); see In re Welfare of Child.

“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” (citations omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).

(stating that appellate courts need not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal).

(holding that the appellate court improperly considered an issue not litigated during summary-judgment proceedings).

(“A reviewing court must generally consider only the issues that the record shows were presented and considered” by the fact -finder “in deciding the matter before it.”).

(concluding that an issue was raised too late when it was raised before the district court but only in a motion for a new trial).

( declining to consider issues raised for the first time on appeal).

(stating that appellate courts generally address only those questions previously presented to and considered by the district court); In re Welfare of Child.

See Thiele v. Stich , (stating that party may not “obtain review by raising the same general issue litigated .

d 580, 582 (Minn. 1988) (stating that generally, appellate courts address only those questions 10 previously presented to and considered by the district court); d 354, 357 (Minn. 1996) (applying this principle to a criminal appeal).

(explaining that an appellate court generally will not consider matters not argued to and considered by the district court).

(explaining that appellate courts “generally will not decide issues which were not raised before the district court”).

(stating that reviewing courts generally will consider only issues presented and considered below and that parties may not obtain review by raising a different theory on appeal); Peterson v. Ne.

See Thiele v. Stich , (stating that appellate courts generally address only those questions previously presented to and considered by the district court).

(“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted)).

-83 (Minn. 1988); see also Minn. R. Civ.

(stating that arguments not raised in the proceedings below will not be considered on appeal ).

The district court determined that the children were progressing, healing, and being supported by therapists (stating that appellate courts generally consider only the issues presented to, considered by, and decided by the district court); (declining to address a constitutional issue raised for the first time on appeal from a termination of parent

(stating that this court generally will only review issues “presented and considered by the [district] court in deciding the matter before it”).

(stating that appellate courts generally will not consider matters not argued to and considered by the district court); Wintz, d at 480; Brodsky, d at 479.