Cited by

“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted).

Assocs., d 580, 582 (Minn. 1988) (explaining that appellate courts generally address only those questions previously presented to and considered by the district court).

owed by Buck.” Nationwide challenges the district court’s decision, arguing first that the district court “committed reversible error in concluding that a golf cart is a vehicle.” But it is well 8 settled that a party may not raise a new issue on appeal, “[n]or may a party obtain review by raising the same general issue litigated below but under a different theory.”

(holding that a reviewing court only considers issues presented to and considered by the district court).

(“Nor may a party obtain review by raising the same general issue litigated below but under a different theory.”).

See Minn. Stat. § 268.105 (2022) (requiring this court to review the ULJ’s eligibility decision); see also Eley v. Southshore Invs ., Inc., (relying on Thiele v. Stich , and declining to address issues not considered by ULJ ).

(stating that reviewing courts “generally consider only those issues that .

(explaining that an appellate court generally will not consider matters not argued to and considered by the district court).

(stating that appellate courts typically address only those questions previously presented to and considered by the district court); (applying this aspect of Thiele in a commitment appeal), rev. denied (Minn. Dec.

“An appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal, and may not consider matters not produced and received in evidence below.” - 83 (Minn. 1988).

But appellants’ argument that Rylander’s motion for disqualification is a tactic for abuse is being raised for the first time on appeal and, therefore, (stating that appellate courts do not address questions not previously presented to and considered by the district court).

(“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the [district] court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted)).

(“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted)).

d 580, 582-83 (Minn. 1988) (“An appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal, and may not consider matters not produced and received in evidence below.”).

(noting that appellate courts generally do not consider issues that were not presented to and considered by the district court).

(“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted)).

Thiele v. Stich , (stating that a party cannot raise a new issue on appeal); Peterson v. Ne.

But the record shows that husband did not raise this issue before the district court , and we “generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the [district] court.” (internal quotes omitted).

This court generally will only review issues “presented and considered by the [district] court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted).

(stating that appellate courts do not address questions not previously presented to and considered by the district court).

(stating inadequately briefed issues are not properly before an appellate court).

(declining to address a constitutional issue raised for the first time on appeal).

(stating that an appellate court generally does not review issues that were not considered and decided by the district court).

Appellate courts “generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented [to] and considered by the [district] court.” (quotation omitted).

26, 2017); Thiele v. Stich , (noting a party cannot raise a new issue on appeal, “[n] or may a party obtain review by raising the same general issue litigated below but under a different theory”).

(explaining that appellate courts generally decline to address issues raised for the first time on appeal); (citing Thiele but explaining that appellate courts may consider an issue raised for the first time on appeal in the interest of justice); see

Although the movant must demonstrate that no genuine issue of material fact exists, “when the moving party makes out a prima facie case, the burden of producing facts that raise a genuine issue shifts to the opposing party.” (discussing Minn. R. Civ.

(stating that an appellate court will not 10 consider matters not presented to and considered by the district court).

As such, we could determine that father’s (stating that reviewing courts generally consider only issues presented to and considered by district court); Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., (“An assignment of error based on mere assertion and not supported by any argument or authorities .

(stating that a party cannot raise a new issue on appeal or obtain review by raising an issue litigated below under a different theory ).

(explaining that appellate courts generally only consider issues that the record shows were presented to and considered by the district court).

Moreover, this court generally considers only those matters “that the record shows were presented and considered by the [district] court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted).

-83 (Minn. 1988) (stating that an appellate court may not consider matters not raised in the district court).

(concluding that a reviewing court may only consider issues that were presented and considered by the district court).

(“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.”) (quotation omitted) ; Indus.

“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented [to] and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted).

“An appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal, and may not consider matters not produced and received in evidence below .” -83 (Minn. 1988).

(stating that appellate courts generally address only those questions previously presented to and considered by the district court).

See Thiele v. Stich , (holding that a reviewing court may only consider issues that were presented to and considered by the district court); In re Tr.