Cited by

(stating that an appellate court will not consider an issue that was not raised or ruled upon by the district court).

(holding that appellate courts generally will not 10 consider matters not argued to and considered by the distr ict court).

“[A]n appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal.” See Holt v. State , n.5 (Minn. 2009) (quoting Thiele v. Stich , –83 (Minn. 1988)).

Fahrendorff v. N. Homes, Inc., d 580, 582 (Minn. 1988) (“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted)).

d 580, 582–83 (Minn. 1988).

See Thiele v. Stich , (holding that a party generally may not raise a new issue on appeal).

(stating that “a reviewing court must 4 generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court i n deciding the matter before it” (quotation omitted)) .

Thiele v. Stich , , 582 (Minn. 1988).

d 580, 582 (Minn. 1988) (noting that a reviewing court must only consider issues presented to and considered by the district court).

d 580, 582 (Minn. 1988) (determining that an appellate court generally will not consider matters not argued to and considered by the district court).

See Thiele v. Stich , (stating that appellate court generally address only those questions previously presented to and considered by the district court); d 481, 485 (Minn. 1997) (applying this aspect of Thiele in a juvenile protection appeal).

A reviewing court “must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” (emphasis added) (quotation omitted).

See Thiele v. Stich , Doe 175 v. Columbia Heights Sch.

Because Foster failed to raise an alleged decline in Johnson’s reasonable monthly expenses during district court proceedings, (holding that appellate courts review “only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court”).

We “generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented to and considered by the [district] court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted).

See Thiele v. Stich , (stating that this court must generally consider only issu es “presented [to] and conside red by the [district] court in deciding the matter before it”).

See Thiele v. Stich , -83 (Minn. 1 988) (noting that party may no t, on appeal, argue issue raised in di strict court that was argued to district court on different theory).

d 580, 582 (Minn. 1982) (holding that this court will generally address only matters presented to and considered by the district court).

Thiele v. Stich , see also Welch v. Comm’r of Pub.

See Thiele v. Stich , (stating that, generally, appellate courts address only those questions previo usly presented to and considered by the district court).

Thiele v. Stich , , 582 (Minn. 1988).

-83 (Minn. 1988) (“An appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal, and may not consider matters not produced and received in evidence below.”).

See T hiele v. Stich , Doe v. Columbia Heights Sch.

d 580, 582 (Minn. 1988) (stating that, generally, appellate courts address only those questions previously presented to and considered by the district court).

d 580, 582 (Minn. 1988).

(declining to address a constitutional issue raised for the first time on appeal from a termination of parental rights).

State v. Morse , , 502 (Minn. 2016) (citing Thiele v. Stich , , 582 (Minn. 1988) ).

See Thiele v. Stich , –83 (Minn. 1988).

Because we do not address issues not presented to and decided by the district court, we decline, without prejudice, to consider Kleynhans’s argument challenging the default judgment.

“A reviewing 15 court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” d 580, 582 (Minn. 1988) (quotation omitted).

However, she did not raise this argument belo w. “A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.”

See Thiele v. Stich , d 580, 582 (Minn. 1988) (stating that appellate court does not generally address matters not presented to and considered by district court).

(“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted)).

See Patterson v. Wu Family Corp. , , 866-68 (Minn. 2000) (addressing circumstances in which party to civil action may be determined to have waived defense of insufficient service of process); Thiele v. Stich , , 582 (Minn. 1988) (holding that "reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that ...