Cited by

“An appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal, and may not consider matters not produced and received in evidence below.” - 83 (Minn. 1988).

(applying this aspect of Thiele to family law case), rev. denied (Minn. Jan.

(applying this aspect of Thiele in a family-law appeal).

-83 (Minn. 1988) (“An appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal, and may not consider matters not produced and received in evidence below.”).

It is well established that “[a] reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted).

(explaining that appellate courts typically only address issues that were presented to and considered by the district court); (“This court does not reweigh the evidence presented to a district court.”).

(“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted)).

(stating reviewing court must generally consider only issues that were presented to and considered by district court).

() (declining to review issues not raised before the ULJ), rev. denied (Minn. June 21, 2022).

Because we do not address arguments not raised to the district court, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Graham’s petition without an evidentiary hearing.

(stating an appellate court may consider only issues presented to the district court).

(“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the [district] court in deciding the matter before it.”) (quotation omitted)).

4 The department argues that relators waived this argument because they did not raise it at any time in the proceedings

(stating that appellate courts generally address only those questions previously presented to and considered by the district court).

We generally consider “only those issues that the record shows were presented [to] and considered by the trial court.” (quotation omitted).

(“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted)).

(applying this aspect of Thiele in a family-law appeal).

3 Assuming, without deciding, that a discovery violation occurred, we conclude that, under either of subdivision 1’s disclosure requirements, any violation was harmless because Duncan has 3 A party cannot “obtain review by raising the same general issue litigated below but under a different theory.” ().

d 580, 582 (Minn. 1988) .

582 (Minn. 1988) (stating that appellate courts generally address only those questions previously presented to and considered by the district court).

d 580, 582 (Minn. 1988) (stating that appellate courts generally address only those questions previously presented to and considered by the district court).

d 580, 582 (Minn. 1988); (declining to consider constitutional challenges first raised on appeal).

[S]ummary judgment is proper when the nonmoving party fails to provide the court with specific indications that there is a genuine issue of fact.” (citation omitted).