Cited by

The district court has broad discretion to evaluate and divide property in a marital dissolution, and it “will not be overturned except for abuse of discretion.”

The district court has broad discretion to evaluate and divide property in a dissolution, and it “will not be overturned except for abuse of discretion.”

“A [district] court has broad discretion in evaluating and dividing property in a marital dissolution and will not be overturned except for [an] abuse of discretion.”

“We will affirm the [district] court’s division of property if it had an acceptable basis in fact and principle even though we might have taken a different approach.”

“A [district] court has broad discretion in evaluating and dividing property in a marital dissolution and will not be overturned except for abuse of discretion.”

[Appellate court s] will affirm the [district] court’s division of property if it had an acceptable basis in fact and principle even though [the reviewing court] might have taken a different approach.” (citation omitted).

“We will affirm the [district] court’s division of property if it had an acceptable basis in fact and principle even though we might have taken a different approach.”

“A [district] court has broad discretion in evaluating and dividing property in a marital dissolution and will not be overturned except for abuse of discretion.”

on the November 8, 2023 appraisal and that he would be the only party harmed by the assignment because wife’s mother planned to pay off the mortgage and all plans for wife’s repayment of that loan were speculative.2 A district court “has broad discretion in evaluating and dividing property in a marital dissolution and will not be overturned except for abuse of discretion.”

13 Generally, the district court “has broad discretion in evaluating and dividing property in a marital dissolution and will not be overturned except for abuse of discretion.”

The district court has broad discretion to evaluate and divide property in a dissolution , and it “will not be overturned except for abuse of discretion.”

as well as property acquired before the marriage .”

ict court abused its discretion by improperly dividing the parties’ marital property, by improperly apportioning debt between the parties, and overlooking marital assets held by Al Somali.3 District courts have “broad discretion in evaluating and dividing property in a marital dissolution” and such a determination “will not be overturned except for abuse of discretion.” (explaining that a reviewing court “will affirm [a district] court’s division of property if it had an acceptable basis in fact

(applying abuse-of-discretion standard of review to equitable division of marital property).

Property “A [district] court has broad discretion in evaluating and dividing property in a marital dissolution and will not be overturned except for abuse of discretion.” (citation omitted).

“[W]e defer to the district court’s underlying findings of fact” and will not set them aside “unless they are clearly erroneous.” ().

(addressing calculation of nonmarital interest in asset that changed in value during marriage); -04 (Minn. 2002) (discussing application of Schmitz formula in different contexts).

DECISION I. Property Valuation The district court “has broad discretion in evaluating and dividing property in a marital dissolution and will not be overturned except for abuse of discretion.”

DECISION Appellant/Cross-Respondent’s Issues “A [district] court has broad discretion in evaluating and dividing property in a marital dissolution and will not be overturned except for abuse of discretion.”

See Torchwood Props., () (continuances); d 96, 100 (Minn. 2002) (division of marital property); (spousal maintenance).

“All property acquired 4 by either spouse during the marriage is presumed to be marital property, without regard to the form of ownership.” Antone v. Antone , - 01 (Minn. 2002).

The district courts have “broad discretion i n evaluating and dividing property in a marital dissolution and will not be overturned except for abuse of discretion.”

[An appellate court] will affirm the [district] court’s division of property if it had an acceptable basis in fact and principle even though [the appellate court] might have taken a different approach.” (citation omitted); see Lee v. Lee , (stating that a district court has “broad discretion regarding the division of property” and that its division of property “will only be reversed on appeal if the [district] court abused its discretion”).

District courts have “ broad discretion in evaluating and dividing property in a marital dissolution and will not be overturned except for abuse of discretion.”

“A [district] court has broad discretion in evaluating and dividing property in a marital dissolution, ” and we “will affirm the [district] court’s division of property if it had an acceptable basis in fact and principle even though we might have taken a different approach.”

“A [district] court has broad discretion in evaluating and dividing property in a marital dissolution and will not be overturned except for abuse of discretion.”

A district court “has broad discretion in evaluating and dividing property in a marital dissolution and will not be overturned except for abuse of [that] discretion.”

To overcome the presumption that property is marital, a party must demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that the property is nonmarital.” -01 (Minn. 2002) (citations omitted), rev. denied (Minn. July 16, 2022); see Minn. Stat. § 518.003, subd.

See, -02 (Minn. 2002) (addressi ng how to determine the extent of marital and nonmarital interests in the same asset).

8 and will not be overturned except for abuse of discretion.” d 96, 100 (Minn. 2002).