Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Antone v. Antone, 645 N.W.2d 96.

175 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(concluding that marital equity was created in property from use of marital funds to pay down the mortgage during the marriage).
In re the Marriage of: Melissa Leigh Brinkman, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
The Schmitz formula “recognizes that the increase in the value of the property acquired before the marriage — that is, the net equity at the time of the marriage —is nonmarital property.”
In re the Marriage of: Kevin James Stanton, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
3b (2018) ; –01 (Minn. 2002).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Kimberly JoAnn Wauzynski, n/k/a/ Kimberly JoAnn Denne, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Dia Eldin Jubara, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“A [district] court has broad discretion in evaluating and dividing property in a marital dissolution and will not be overturned except for abuse of discretion.”
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Francis Stephen Gill, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“A [district] court has broad discretion in evaluating and dividing property in a marital dissolution and will not be overturned except for abuse of discretion.” (citation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: James Warren Huerd, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Charles Robert Aufenthie, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
-23 (Minn. 1986); d 96, 100 (Minn. 2002) (“A trial court has broad discretion in evaluating and divid ing property in a marital dissolution and will not be overturned except for abuse of discretion.”).
A19-1182 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Jonathon Henry Ortner, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In the Marriage of: Debra Lynn Ober, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Even if we might have taken a different approach, we will affirm the division if it had an “acceptable basis in fact and principle.” .
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Heidi Renae Karn-Kirwin, n/k/a Heidi Renae Karn, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A18-1408 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“To overcome the presumption that property is marital, a party must demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that the property is nonmarital.” Antone v. Antone
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Marie Tiedke, nka Kathleen Marie Freitag, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“A trial court has broad discretion in evaluating and dividing property in a marital dissolution and will not be overturned except for abuse of discretion.”
In the Marriage of: Deborah J. Schmitt, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2019
dividing pro perty in a marital dissolution and will not be overtur ned except for abuse of disc retion.”
In re the Marriage of: Amy Alyssa Post, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
An appellate court “will affirm the [district] court’s division of property if it had an acceptable basis in fact and principle even though [the appellate court] might have taken a different approach.” Antone v. Antone
In re the Marriage of: Mark Allen Kedrowski, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Laurie S. Morris Hiniker a/k/a Laurie Suzette Morris, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Jesse A. Freking, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A district court abuses its discretion when d ividing property if its division lacks a “basis in fact and principle.” Antone v. Antone
In re the Marriage of: Bijoy Raghavan, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
This court will affirm a district court’s division of property if that division has “an acceptable basis in fact and principle.”
Gill v. Gill 919 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 2018
Gill v. Gill 919 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 2018
Antone v. Antone , , 100 (Minn. 2002).
In re the Marriage of: Amy Marie Causton, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Antone v. Antone , Chamberlain v. Chamberlain , review denied (Minn. Oct.
Leon Tijuan Jackson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Minn. 2018
After we ruled that the appreciation of premarital pro perty is itself marital property, –03 (Minn. 2002), Antone filed suit against Mirviss, alleging that Mirviss was negligent when drafting the antenuptial agreement.
In re the Marriage of: Patricia Rose Whipps, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
We will affirm a district court’s proper ty division “if it had an acceptable basis in fact and principle even though we might have taken a different approach.”
In re the Marriage of: Brent Lee Florine, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A17-0300 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A [district] court has broad discretion in evaluating and dividing property in a marital dissolution and will not be overturned except for abuse of discretion.”
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2017
The Schmitz formula is used “to determ ine marital and nonmarital interests in property acquired before the marriage.” (citations omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Andrew Scott Green, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Appellate courts ‘will affirm the [district] court’s division of property if it had an acceptable basis in fact and principle even though [the appellate court] might have taken a different approach.’” Sirek, d at 898 ().
In re the Marriage of: Jennifer Kristin Gorney, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(explaining that the district court has discretion in evaluating and dividing property in a martial dissolution); (concluding that it is 6 “unable to say from the record that the [district] court abused its discretion in setting dates
In re the Marriage of: Robert William Bessenbacher, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Gill v. Gill 900 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Gill v. Gill 900 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Michael R. Shreve, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Jose Flores Moran, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Michelle Beth Kremer v. Robbie Michael Kremer 889 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Michelle Beth Kremer v. Robbie Michael Kremer 889 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
This court will affirm a district court’s division of property if that division has “an acceptable basis in fact and principle.”
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Jean Rucker v. Kraig Vernon Rucker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Jean Rucker v. Kraig Vernon Rucker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Paul Grant Gardner v. Margaret Rose Gardner Minn. Ct. App. 2016

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by